Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis ofbut

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abraham, W.: 1977, ‘But’, inUEA Papers in Linguistics, No. 3.

  • Anscombre, J. C. and O. Ducrot: 1977, ‘Deux mais en Francais?’,Lingua 43, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Lev, Z. and A. Placas: 1980, ‘Semantic Command over Pragmatic Priority’,Lingua 51, 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, D. L.: 1987,Semantic Constraints on Relevance, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockway, D. L.: 1981, ‘Semantic Constraints on Relevance’, in H. Parret, M. Sbisa and J. Verscheueren (eds.),Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R.: forthcoming, ‘Explicature, Implicature and Truth Theoretic Semantics’, in R. Kempson (ed.),Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Clark, H.: 1977, ‘Bridging’, in P. Johnson-Laird and P. Wason (eds.),Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M. and T. Katriel: 1977, ‘Between Semantics and Pragmatics: The Two Types of “but” — Hebrew “aval” and “ela”‘,Theoretical Linguistics,4, 143–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G.: 1979,Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.),Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3. Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1978, ‘Further Notes on Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole (ed.),Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9. Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L.: 1985, ‘Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity’,Language 61(1), 121–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L.: 1974, ‘On Pragmatic and Semantic Aspects of Meaning’, Paper Presented at the 11th Annual Philosophy Colloquium.

  • Karttunen, L. and S. Peters: 1979, ‘Conventional Implicature’, in C. K. Oh (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 11:Presupposition, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1971, ‘Presuppositions and Relative Well-formedness’, in D. D. Steinberg, and L. A. Jakobovits (eds.),Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R.: 1971, ‘If's, and's and but's about Conjunction’, in C. J. Fillmore and D. T. Langendoes (eds.),Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986,Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Blackwell Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1974, ‘Pragmatic Presupposition’, in M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.),Semantics and Philosophy: Studies in Contemporary Philosophy, New York University Press, New York, pp. 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.: 1975,Pressuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Arts, Southampton Univ., 509 5HH, Southampton, England

    Diane Blakemore

Authors
  1. Diane Blakemore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blakemore, D. Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis ofbut . Linguist Philos 12, 15–37 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627397

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627397

Keywords

Search

Navigation