Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic squares

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • van Benthem, J., 1991,Language in Action, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, P., ed., 1978,Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, T., 1992, “Transition Systems and Dynamic Semantics”, in Pearce and Wagner, eds, 232–251.

  • Fitting, M., 1983,Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Uehling, and Wettstein, eds, 1979,Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F., eds, 1984,Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. I (Classical Logic), Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F., eds, 1984,Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. II (Extensions of Classical Logic), D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargov, G., Passy, S., and Tinchev, T., 1987, “Modal Environment for Boolean Speculations”, in D. Skordev, ed., 253–263.

  • Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., and Stokhof, M., eds, 1981,Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M., 1991, “Dynamic Predicate Logic”,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyuris, V., Kurucz, Á., Németi, I., and Sain, I., 1992, “Associativity Implies Undecidability in Arrow Logic”, inLogic at Work, Proceedings of the Applied Logic Conference, CCSOM, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, D., 1984, “Dynamic Logic”, in Gabbay and Guenthner, eds, 497–604.

  • Heim, I., 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD Thesis, University of Massachussets.

  • Henkin, L., 1950, “Completeness in the Theory of Types”,Journal of Symbolic Logic 15, 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L., Monk, J., and Tarski, A., 1971,Cylindric Algebras. Part 1, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L., Monk, J., and Tarski, A., 1985,Cylindric Algebras. Part 2, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H., 1971, “Formal Properties of ‘now’”,Theoria 37, 227–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H., 1981, “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation”, in Groenendijk, Janssen and Stokhof, eds.

  • Kalman, L. and Polos, L., 1993,Papers from the 2nd Symposium on Logic and Language, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D., 1979, “On the Logic of Demonstratives”, in French, Uehling, and Wettstein, eds, 401–412.

  • Kuhn, S., 1989, “The Domino Relation: Flattening a Two Dimensional Modal Logic,Journal of Philosophical Logic 18, 173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, M., Szabolcs, M., Németi, I., and Sain, I., 1992, “Investigations in Arrow Logic”, inLogic at Work, Proceedings of the Applied Logic Conference, CCSOM, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R., 1970, “Universal Grammar”,Theoria 36, 373–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Németi, I., 1992, “Decidability of Weakened Versions of First Order Logic”, inLogic at Work, Proceedings of the Applied Logic Conference, CCSOM, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. and Wagner, G., 1992,Logics in AI. Proceedings of JELIA '92, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rijke, M., 1992a, “A System of Dynamic Modal Logic”, Technical Report CSLI-92-170, Stanford University, to appear inJournal of Philosophical Logic.

  • de Rijke, M., 1992b, “Meeting Some Neighbours”, ILLC Report LP-92-10, University of Amsterdam, to appear in J. van Eijck and A. Visser, eds,Logic and Information Flow, MIT Press.

  • Segerberg, K., 1980, “Two Dimensional Modal Logic”,Journal of Philosophical Logic 9, 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R., 1978, “Assertion”, in Cole, ed.

  • Skordev, D., ed., 1987,Mathematical Logic and its Applications, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, S., 1972, “Semantic Analysis of Tense Logic”,Journal of Symbolic Logic 37, 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, F., 1991, “Defaults in Update Semantics”, to appear inJournal of Philosophical Logic.

  • Venema, Y., 1991,Many Dimensional Modal Logic, Academisch Proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

  • Venema, Y., 1992, “A Note on the Tense Logic of Dominoes”,Journal of Philosophical Logic 21, 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venema, Y., 1994, “A Crash Course in Arrow Logic”, Logic Group Preprint Series No. 107, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, to appear in L. Pólós, M. Marx and M. Masuch, eds,Arrow Logic.

  • Vermeulen, K., 1991, “Merging Without Mystery”, Logic Group Preprint Series No. 70, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University.

  • Vermeulen, K., 1992, “Incremental Semantics for Propositional Texts”, inLogic at Work, Proceedings of the Applied Logic Conference, CCSOM, Amsterdam.

  • Visser, A., 1992a, “Actions Under Presuppositions”, Logic Group Preprint Series No. 70, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University.

  • Visser, A., 1992b, “Meanings in Time”, manuscript, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University.

  • Zeevat, H., 1991, “A Compositional Version of DRT”,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 95–131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blackburn, P., Venema, Y. Dynamic squares. J Philos Logic 24, 469–523 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052600

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052600

Navigation