Skip to main content
Log in

Wittgenstein'sTractatus and the problem of a phenomenological language

  • Philosophical Survey
  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anscombe, E. 1965.An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus, 2nd ed., Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canfield, J. V. 1972. “A ModelTractatus Language”,The Philosophical Forum 4, pp. 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. W. 1994.Wittgenstein's Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. 1965.Wittgenstein's Logical Atomism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, M. B., Hintikka, J. 1986.Investigating Wittgenstein, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro, H. 1990. “Can the World Impose Logical Structure on Language?” inWittgenstein — Eine Neubewertung. Akten des 14. Internationalen Wittgenstein-Symposiums, ed. R. Haller and J. Brandl, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien, pp. 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. (ed.) 1980.Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1932, from the notes of J. King and D. Lee, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, B. 1981, “The So-called Realism of Wittgenstein'sTractatus”, inPerspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, ed. I. Block, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikel, A. 1998. “Objects and Possible Worlds in theTractatus”,Philosophia 27, pp. 383–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. 1922. “The status of sense data”, inPhilosophical Studies, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. 1963.Philosophical Papers, George Allen & Unwin, London/Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears, D. 1987.The False Prison. A Study of the Development of Wittgenstein's Philosophy, Vol. 1, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1918. “The relation of sense-data to physics”, inMysticism and Logic, Longmans, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1929. “Some Remarks on Logical Form”,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 9, pp. 162–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1953.Philosophical Investigations, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1961.Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1975.Philosophical Remarks, ed. R. Rhees, translated by R. Hargreaves and R. White, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1979.Notebooks 1914–1916, second edition. ed. G. H. v. Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemach, E. W. 1990. “The Tractatus Theory of Objects”, inWittgenstein—Eine Neubewertung, pp. 35–50.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blank, A. Wittgenstein'sTractatus and the problem of a phenomenological language. Philosophia 29, 327–341 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379915

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379915

Keywords

Navigation