Abstract
The work of sociologists of knowledge and socially oriented historians of science should be of interest to epistemologists for one clear and overriding reason. It furnishes a theory of knowledge which exhibits knowing as a social process, and knowledge as a collective accomplishment. Such a claim should not be underestimated. The sociology of knowledge challenges much that has been put forward in the name of epistemology. There are a number of dimensions along which that challenge proceeds. First, the work, which has generated a social conception of knowledge is concrete rather than abstract. All too often philosophers have distanced themselves from the contingencies of real, historical cases in favour of logical formalism and displays of technical virtuosity. Second, the sociological approach is naturalistic rather than normative. The word ‘normative’ is not the opposite of ‘naturalistic’, but one way to evade the discipline of naturalistic enquiry is to retreat from the world of fact, the ‘is’, into a world of unsituated ‘oughts’, ideals and free-floating values. Concern with how a ‘true’ or ‘ational’ scientist ought to behave can be an excuse for avoiding the question of how actual passages of scientific work proceed. Third, and most important of all, the sociology of knowledge challenges the widely held individualism that permeates epistemology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arthur, W.: 1984, `Competing Technologies and Economic Prediction’, Options 2, 10–13. Barnes, B.: 1979, `Vicissitudes of Belief, Social Studies of Science 9, 247–263.
Barnes, B.: 1982, T. S. Kuhn and Social Science, Macmillan, London.
Barnes, B.: 1984, `Problems of Intelligibility and Paradigm Instances’, in J. Brown (ed.) Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 113–125.
Barnes, B.: 1988, The Nature of Power, Polity Press, Cambridge
Barnes, B.: 1991, `How Not To Do the Sociology of Knowledge’, Annals of Scholarship 8, no. 3, 321–335.
Barnes, B.: 1992, `Realism, Relativism and Finitism’, in D. Raven, L.V. Thyssen and J. de Wolf (eds.), Cognitive Relativism and Social Science, Transaction Publications, London, pp. 131–147.
Barnes, B.: 1993, `How To Do the Sociology of Knowledge’, Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 28, 7–23.
Barnes, B. and D. Bloor: 1982 `Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge’ in M. Hollis and S. Lukes (eds.), Rationality and Relativism, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 21–47.
Barnes, B., D. Bloor and J. Henry: 1996, Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis, Athlone, London and Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Bloor, D.: 1981, `Hamilton and Peacock on the Essence of Algebra’, in H. Mehrtens, H. Bos and I. Schneider (eds.), Social History of Nineteenth Century Mathematics, Birkhauser, Boston, pp. 262–232.
Bloor, D.: 1989, `Rationalism, Supernaturalism and the Sociology of Knowledge’, in I. Hronsky, M. Féhér, B. Dajka, Scientific Knowledge Socialised, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 5974.
Bloor, D.: 1991, Knowledge and Social Imagery, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Bloor, D.: 1996, `The Question of Linguistic Idealism Revisited’, in H. Sluga and D. Stern (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, pp. 354–382.
Bloor, D.: 1997a, Wittgenstein: Rules and Institutions, Routledge, London.
Bloor, D.: 1997b, `Remember the Strong Programme?’, Science, Technology and Human Values 22, 373–385.
Broadbent, D.: 1973, In Defence of Empirical Psychology,Methuen, London.
Brown, J.(ed.): 1984, Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Campbell, D.: 1989, `Models of Language Learning and their Implications for Social Constructionist Analyses of Scientific Belief,’ in S. Fuller, M. de Mey, T. Shinn and S. Woolgar (eds.)The Cognitive Turn: Sociological and Psychological Perspectives on Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 153–158.
Carnap, R.: 1952, The Continuum of Inductive Methods, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Cole, S.: 1992, Making Science: Between Nature and Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Cole, S.: 1996, `Voodoo Sociology: Recent Developments in the Sociology of Science’ in P. Gross, N. Levitt and M. Lewis (eds.), The Flight from Science and Reason, New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp. 274–287.
Collins, H.: 1985, Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, Sage, London.
Collins, H.: 1996, `In Praise of Futile Gestures: How Scientific is the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge?’, Social Studies of Science 26, 229–244.
Conant, J.: 1966, `The Overthrow of the Phlogiston Theory’, in J. Conant and L. Nash (eds.),Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science, vol. I, pp. 67–115.
Desmond, A.: 1989, The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine and Reform in Radical London, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Edge, D. and M. Mulkay: 1976, Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain, Wiley, New York.
Feyerabend, P.: 1963, `How to be a Good Empiricist — A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological’, in B. Baumrin (ed.) Philosophy of Science. The Delaware Seminar vol. II, Interscience, New York, pp. 3–39.
Feyerabend, P.: 1988, Against Method, Verso, New York.
Fine, A.: 1996, `Knowledge Made Up; Constructivists Sociology of Scientific Knowledge’, in P. Galison and D. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Cal., pp. 231–254.
Fritzsche, P.: 1992, A Nation of Flyers: German Aviation and the Popular Imagination, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass..
Gottfried, K. and K. Wilson, K: 1997, `Science a Cultural Construct’, Nature 386, 545–547.
Gregory, R.: 1966, Eye and Brain. The Psychology of Seeing, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.
Haack, S.: 1996, `Towards a Sober Sociology of Science’, in P. Gross, N. Levitt, and M. Lewis (eds.), The Flight from Science and Reason, New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp. 259–265.
Hardwig, J.: 1991, `The Role of Trust in Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 88, 693–708.
Hashimoto, T.: 1990, Theory, Experiment, and Design Practice. The Formation of Aeronautical Research, 1909–1930. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Baltimore,Maryland.
Haugeland, J.: 1990, `The Intentionality All-Stars’, in J. Tomberlin (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 4, Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind, Ridgeview, Ataxadero, Cal, pp. 383–427.
Hon, G.: 1995, `Is the Identification of Experimental Error Contextually Dependent? The Case of Kaufmann’s Experiment and its Varied Reception’, in J. Z.Buchwald (ed.), Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 170–223.
Harwood, J 1993, Styles of Scientific Thought; The German Genetics Community 19001933,University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hermstein Smith, B.: 1997, Belief and Resistance. Dynamics of ContemporaryControversy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Hesse, M.: 1974, The Structure of Scientific Inference, Macmillan, London.
Hesse, M.: 1980, Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Harvester, Brighton.
Hollinger, D.: 1995 `Science as a Weapon in Kulturkampfe in the United States During and After World War II’, Isis, vol. 86, 440–454.
Hume, D.: 1739, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1960).
Kaiser, D.: 1998, `A Mannheim for All Seasons: Bloor, Merton, and the Roots of the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge’, Science in Context, vol. 11, 51–87.
Kuhn, T.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Kusch, M.: 1995, Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge,Routledge, London.
Kusch, M.: 1999, Psychological Knowledge. A Social History and Philosophy,Routledge,London.
Lakatos, I.: 1971, `History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions’, in R. Buck and R.
Cohen (eds.) Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science,vol.VIII, 91–136. Latour, B.: 1987, Science in Action,Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Latour, B.: 1988, The Pasteurization of France, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. Latour, B.: 1992, `One More Turn After the Social Turn’, in E. McMullin (ed.), The Social Dimension of Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Ind., pp. 272–294.
Latour, B.: 1993, We Have Never Been Modern, Harvester Press, New York.
Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth,Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Laudan, L.: 1984, `The Pseudo-Science of Science?’, in J. Brown (ed.), Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn, Reidel, Dordrecht, 41–73.
Longino, H.: 1992, `Essential Tensions–Phase Two; Feminist, Philosophical, and Social Studies of Science’, in E. McMullin (ed.), The Social Dimension of Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Ind., pp. 198–216.
MacKenzie, D.: 1981, Statistics in Britain 1865–1930. The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Mannheim, K.: 1936, Ideology and Utopia (trans. L. Wirth and E. Shits ), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Martin, B.: 1996, `Sticking a Needle into Science: The Case of Polio Vaccines and the Origin of AIDS’, Social Studies of Science 26, 245–276.
Merton, R.: 1942, `Science and Technology in a Democratic Order’, Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1, 115–126, reprinted as ch. 13 in The Sociology of Science, 1973, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Merton, R.: 1973 The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations,University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Mills, E.: 1980, `Alexander Agassiz, Carl Chun and the Problem of the Intermediate Fauna’, in M. Sears and D. Merriman (eds.), Oceanography: The Past, Proceedings of the Third International Congress on the History of Oceanography, New York, pp. 360–372.
Osgood, C.: 1953, Method and Theory in Experimental Psychology, Oxford University Press, New York.
Pannekoek, A.: 1953, `The Discovery of Neptune’, Centaurus 3, 126–137.
Pickering, A.: 1995, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics,Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Pickering, A.: 1995, The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Pinch, T.: 1986, Confronting Nature: The Sociology of Solar Neutrino Detection,Reidel,Dordrecht.
Popper, K.: 1945, The Open Society and its Enemies, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Popper, K.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.
Restivo, S.: 1995, The Theory Landscape in Science Studies, in S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen, T. Pinch (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage, London.
Richards, J.: 1988, Mathematical Visions: The Pursuit of Geometry in Victorian England,Academic Press, London.
Rudwick, M.: 1985, The Great Devonian Controversy. The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Scott, P., Richards, E. and Martin, B.: 1990, `Captives of Controversy: The Myth of the Neutral Social Researcher in Contemporary Scientific Controversies’, Science, Technology and Human Values 15, 474–494.
Searle, J.: 1995, The Construction of Social Reality, Allen Lane, Harmondsworth, Middlesex. Shapin, S.: 1982, `History of Science and its Social Reconstructions’, History of Science 20, 157–211.
Shapin, S.: 1994, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S.: 1985, Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Stark, J.: 1938, `The Pragmatic and Dogmatic Spirit in Science’, Nature, vol.141, 770–772. Stove, D.: 1991, The Plato Cult, Blackwell, Oxford.
von Kármán, T.: 1967, (with Lee Edson),The Wind and Beyond: Theodore von Karman Pioneer in Aviation and Pathfinder in SpaceLittle Brown, Boston
Warwick, A.: 1992–3, `Cambridge Mathematics and Cavendish Physics: Cunningham, Campbell, and Einstein’s Relativity, Pt.I The Uses of Theory, Pt. Il Comparing Traditions in Cambridge Physics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23, 625–656, 24, 125.
Wylie, A.: 1996, `The Constitution of Archaeological Evidence: Gender Politics and
Science’, in P. Galison and D. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science,Stanford University Press, Stanford, Cal., pp. 311–343.
Zuckerman, H.: 1988, `The Sociology of Science’, in N.J. Smelser (ed.) Handbook of Sociology, Sage, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bloor, D. (2004). Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. In: Niiniluoto, I., Sintonen, M., Woleński, J. (eds) Handbook of Epistemology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-6969-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-1986-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive