Abstract
We describe the relation between coherence and foundations approaches to belief change in terms of a correspondence between epistemic entrenchment relations(Gärdenfors and Makinson, 1988; Rott, 1992) and dependence consequence relations from Bochman (1999, 2000a).The general conclusion of the study is that dependence consequence relations are sufficiently expressive to subsume the notion of an epistemic entrenchment and its generalizations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bochman, A. Entrenchment versus Dependence: Coherence and Foundations in Belief Change. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11, 3–27 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013064206171
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013064206171