Skip to main content
Log in

Aristotle’s Non-Logical Works and the Square of Oppositions in Semiotics

  • Published:
Logica Universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This paper aims to highlight some peculiarities of the semiotic square, whose creation is due in particular to Greimas’ works. The starting point is the semiotic notion of complex term, which I regard as one of the main differences between Greimas’ square and Blanché’s hexagon. The remarks on the complex terms make room for a historical survey in Aristotle’s texts, where one can find the philosophical roots of the idea of middle term between two contraries and its relation to notions such as difference, position and motion. In the Stagirite’s non-logical works, the theory of the intermediate, or middle term, represents an important link between opposition issues and ethics: this becomes a privileged perspective from which to reconsider the semiotic use of the square, i.e., its inclusion in the semio-narrative structures articulating the sense of texts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Bonfiglioli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonfiglioli, S. Aristotle’s Non-Logical Works and the Square of Oppositions in Semiotics. Log. univers. 2, 107–126 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-007-0021-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-007-0021-z

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000).

Keywords.

Navigation