Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:41:29.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and asymmetry versus the social brain – where are the testable predictions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2005

T. J. Crow
T. J. Crow*
Affiliation:
SANE POWIC, Warneford Hospital, OxfordOX3 7JX, Englandwww.psychiatry.ox.ac.uk/powic/index.htm
*
tim.crow@psychiatry.oxford.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

I agree with Burns that an evolutionary theory is required, but I question his multifactorial premise. The arguments for an evolutionary theory are stronger, and one that is more precise than that presented by Burns has already been formulated. This theory, that schizophrenia is “the price that Homo sapiens pays for language,” (Crow 1997a; 2000b, 2004c), generates testable predictions absent from Burns' presentation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 857 - 858
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)