Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing evolutionary epistemology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are two interrelated but distinct programs which go by the name “evolutionary epistemology.” One attempts to account for the characteristics of cognitive mechanisms in animals and humans by a straightforward extension of the biological theory of evolution to those aspects or traits of animals which are the biological substrates of cognitive activity, e.g., their brains, sensory systems, motor systems, etc. (EEM program). The other program attempts to account for the evaluation of ideas, scientific theories and culture in general by using models and metaphors drawn from evolutionary biology (EET program). The paper begins by distinguishing the two programs and discussing the relationship between them. The next section addresses the metaphorical and analogical relationship between evolutionary epistemology and evolutionary biology. Section IV treats the question of the locus of the epistemological problem in the light of an evolutionary analysis. The key questions here involve the relationship between evolutionary epistemology and traditional epistemology and the legitimacy of evolutionary epistemology as epistemology. Section V examines the underlying ontological presuppositions and implications of evolutionary epistemology. Finally, section VI, which is merely the sketch of a problem, addresses the parallel between evolutionary epistemology and evolutionary ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ackermann, R.: 1970, The Philosophy of Science, Pegasus, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, W. W.: 1976 ‘The Philosophy of Karl Popper: Part I: Biology & Evolutionary Epistemology,’ Philosophia 6, 453–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. 1984, ‘The Evolution of Our Understanding of the Cell: A Study in the Dynamics of Scientific Progress,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15, 309–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddall, Barbara: 1968, ‘Wallace, Darwin and the Theory of Natural Selection,’ Journal of the History of Biology, 1, 261–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, R. J.: 1969, Discovery in the Physical Sciences, University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, R. J.: 1973a, ‘Toulmin's Model of an Evolutionary Epistemology,’ Modern Schoolman 51, 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, R. J.: 1973b, ‘The Adaptation Theory of Science,’ International Philosophical Quarterly 13, 319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J.: 1985, Culture and the Evolutionary Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, Michael: 1980, ‘Models, Metaphors and Scientific Realism,’ Nature and System 2, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, Michael: 1982, ‘A Darwinian Approach to the Evolution of Science,’ in Proceedings of the Ohio Philosophical Association, pp. 72–85.

  • Bradie, Michael: 1984a, ‘The Metaphorical Character of Science,’ Philosophia Naturalis 21, 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, Michael: 1984b, ‘Metaphors in Science,’ presented at the International Conference on System Research Informatics and Cybernetics, Baden-Baden, West Germany (August 1–5. 1984).

  • Brewer, M. B. and Collins, B. E.: 1981a, Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences: A Volume in Honor of Donald T. Campbell, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. and Collins, B. E.: 1981b, ‘Perspectives on Knowing: Six Themes from Donald T. Campbell,’ in Brewer and Collins.

  • Bunge, Mario: 1983, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, V. 5: Epistemology and Methodology I: Exploring the World, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R.: 1985, ‘Review of G. Munevar, Radical Knowledge,’ Philosophy of Science 52, 163–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T.: 1960, ‘Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought and in Other Knowledge Processes,’ Psychological Review 67, 380–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T.: 1974a, ‘Evolutionary Epistemology,’ in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, I, Open Court, La Salle, Ill., pp. 413–463.

  • Campbell, D. T.: 1974b, ‘Unjustified Variation and Selective Retention in Scientific Discovery,’ in F. J. Ayala and T. Dobzhansky (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, MacMillan, London, pp. 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T.: 1975a, ‘On the Conflicts Between Biological and Social Evolution and Between Psychology and Moral Tradition,’ American Psychologist, 30, 1103–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T.: 1975b, ‘Reintroducing Konrad Lorenz to Psychology,’ in R. I. Evans (ed.), Konrad Lorenz: The Man and His Ideas, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T.: 1977, ‘Comment on “The Natural Selection Model of Conceptual Evolution”,’ philosophy of Science 44, 502–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T.: 1979a, ‘A Tribal Model of the Social System Vehicle Carrying Scientific Knowledge,’ Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, I, 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T.: 1979 version, ‘Descriptive Epistemology: Psychological, Sociological, and Evolutionary,’ (Preliminary Draft of the William James Lectures, Harvard University, Spring 1977.

  • Capek, Milic: 1969, ‘Ernst Mach's Biological Theory of Knowledge,’ in Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, V, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 400–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capek, Milic: 1971, Bergson and Modern Physics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and Feldman, M. W.: 1981, Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach, Princeton university Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. J.: 1983, ‘Meaning and Evolutionary Epistemology,’ Theoria 49, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. J.: 1984, ‘Evolutionary and Epistemology and Ontological Realism,’ in The Philosophical Quarterly 34, 482–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J.: 1973, ‘Is the Progress of Science Evolutionary?,’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 24, 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J.: 1974, ‘Professor Hull and the Evolution of Science,’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25, 334–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M.: 1974, Logicsl and Epistemological Stuidies in Contemporary Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, P. J.: 1977. ‘Evolutionary Epistemology: A Question of Justification,’ Philosophical Studies 25 (Ireland), 228–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, Gregory: 1978, ‘Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology: A Critique,’ Synthese 37, 413–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1976, The selfish Gene, Oxford, New York.

  • Dawkins, R.: 1982, The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection, Freeman, San Francisco. (Paperback: Oxford Universitry Press, 1983.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel C.: 1981, ‘Why the Law of Effect Will Not Go Away,’ in D. C. Dennett, Brainstorms, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel C.: 1984, Elbow Room, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1973, ‘Ethics and Values in Biological and Cultural Evolution,’ Zygon 8, 261–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1971, ‘Perception From An Epistemological Point of View,’ Journal Philosophy LXVIII, 19, 584–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. C.: 1973, ‘Cultural Evolution Versus Biological Evolution,’ Zygon 8, 282–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon: 1979, Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon: 1983, Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Ludwik: 1979, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A.: 1967, Evolutionary Ethics, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, Ron N.: 1985, ‘Philosophy of Science Naturalized,’ Philosophy of Science 52, 331–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grmek, M. D., Cohen, R. S. and Cimino, G. (eds.): 1981, On Scientific Discovery: The Erice Lectures 1977, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, James: 1979, ‘Mill and Darwin: THe Natural Selection of Ideas,’ Mill News 14, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Mary: 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Holton, Gerald: 1973, Thematic Origins of Modern Science: Kepler to Einstein, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1973, ‘A Populational Approach to Scientific Change,’ Science 102, 1121–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1974, ‘Are the “Members” of Biologicsl Species “Similar” to Each Other?’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 332–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1975, ‘Central Subjects and Historical Narratives,’ History and Theory 14, 253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1978, ‘Altruism in Science: A Sociobiological Model of Co-operative Behavior Among Scientists,’ Animal Behavior d26, 685–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1982, ‘The Naked Meme,’ in Plotkin, H. C. (ed.) Learning Development, and Culture, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1983, ‘Exemplars and Scientific Change,’ in Asquith, P. D. and Nickles T. (eds.), PSA 1982 2, 479–503.

  • Hull, D. L.: 19

  • Hull, D. L.: 1985 (forthcoming), ‘Interactors versus Vehicles.’

  • James, William: 1980, ‘Great Men, Great Thoughts, and the Environment,’ Atlantic Monthly, XLVI, no. CCLXXVI, 441–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kary, Carla: 1982, ‘Can Darwinian Inheritance be extended from Biology to Epistemology?’, in Asquith, P. D. and Nickles, T. (eds.), PSA 1982, Philosophy of Science Association, East lansing, Mich., pp. 356–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar, Robert: 1984, ‘A short Introduction to the Biological Principles of Evolutionary Epistemology,” in Wuketits, F. M. (ed.) Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1983, The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge, Oxford, New York.

  • Kordig, Carl R.: 1982, ‘Evolutionary Epistemology is Self-Referentially Inconsistent,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42, 449–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordig, Carl R.: 1983, ‘Self-Reliance and Philosophy,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 20, 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.): 1970, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton. J.: 1980, ‘Darwinism and the Behavioral Theory of Sociocultural Evolution: An Analysis,’ American Journal of Sociology 85, 28–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifellner, W.: 1984, ‘Evolutionary Causality, Theory of Games, and Evolution of Intelligence,’ in Wuketits, F. M. (ed.) Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epiatemology Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 233–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1978, ‘Adaptation,’ Scientific American.

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1982, ‘Organism and Environment,’ in Plotkin, H. C. (ed.), Learning, Development, and Culture, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Konrad: 1977, Behind the Mirror, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Konrad: 1974, ‘Analogy as a Source of Knowledge,’ Science 185, 229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Konrad: 1982, ‘Kant's Doctrine of the a priori in the Light of Contemporary Biology,’ in Plotkin, H. C. (ed.), Learning, Development, and Culture, Wiley, Chichester, pp 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losee, J.: 1977, ‘Limitations of an Evolutionist Philosophy of Science,’ Studies in History and the Philosophy of Science 8, 349–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • low, Reinhard: 1977, ‘The Metaphysical Limits of Evolutionary Epistemology,’ in Wuketits, F. M. (ed.) Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C. J. and Wilson, E. O: 1981, Genes, Mind and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E.: 1986, ‘On the Part Played By Accident in Invention and Discovery,’ Monist VI, 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • mach, E.: 1943, Popular Scientific Lectures, Open Court, La Salle.

  • Mayr, E.: 1983, ‘Comments on David Hull's paper on Exemplars and Type Specimens,’ in Asquith, P. D. and Nickles, T. (eds.), PSA 1982 2, 504–511.

  • Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E.: 1974, ‘Models and Analogies in Science,’ in New Catholic Encyclopedia (Supplemetary Volume) 16.

  • McMullin, E.: 1976, ‘THe Fertility of Theory and the Unit for Appraisal in Science,’ in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 39.

  • Mohr, Hans: 1984, ‘The Ethics of Science: Compatible with the Concept of Evolutionary Epistemology?’, in Wuketits, F. M. (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munevar, G.: 1981, ‘Radical Knowledge: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and Limits of Science, Hackett, Indianaplis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, Arne: 1973, ‘Comments on “Knowledge versus Survival”,’ Inquiry 16, 315–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1973, ‘Ethics as an Autonomous Theoretical Subject,’ in Stent, G. (ed.), Morality as a Biological Phenomenon, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1984, Is Science Progressive? Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, Erhard: 1984, ‘The Evolution of Scientific Method,’ in Wuketits, F. M. (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 149–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hear, Anthony: 1900, ‘Review of R. Riedl: Biology of Knowledge,’ British Journal for The Philosophy of Science 36, 354–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olding, A.: 1983, ‘Biology and Knowledge,’ Theoria, 49, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1971, Biology and Knowledge: An Essay on the Relations between Organic Regulations and Cognitive Processes, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pltkin, H. C. (ed.): 1982, Learning, Development, and Culture: Essays in Evolutionary Epistemology, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1968, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1972a, ‘Of Clouds and Clocks,’ in Karl, Popper, Objective Knowledge, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 206–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1972, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1972b, ‘The Bucket and the Search Light: Two Theories of Knowledge,’ in K. Popper, Objective Knowledge, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1972c, ‘Epistemology Without a Knowing Subject,’ in K. Popper, Objective Knowledge, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 106–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1972d, ‘Evolution and the Tree of Knowledge,’ in Karl Popper, objective Knowledge, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 256–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • popper, K. R.: 1972e, ‘Two Faces of Commonsense Theory of Knowledge,’ in K. Popper, Objective Knowledge, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1976, ‘Darwinism As A Metaphysical Research Programme,’ methodology and Science 9, 103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1978, ‘Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind,’ Dialectica 32, 339–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1984, ‘Evolutionary Epistemology,’ in Pollard, J. W. (ed.), Evolutionary Theory: Paths into the Future, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1982, ‘Why Reason Can't Be Naturalized,’ Synthese 52, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, W. S.: 1945, ‘The Moral Theory of Evolutionary Naturalism, Yale university Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1969, ‘Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1972, ‘Epistemology Naturalized,’ in Royce, J. R. and Rosebaum, W. W. (eds.), The Psychology of Knowing, Gordon and Breach, New York, pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1981,‘Rely tp Stroud’, in French, P. A., Uehling, T. E. Jr., Wettstein, H. K. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy VI, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, pp. 473–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff, F.: 1971, ‘Illusions in Man and His Instruments’, Journal of Philosophy, 19, 591–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1977, Methodological Pragmatism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. J.: 1977, ‘The Natural Selection Model of Conceptual Evolution’, Philosophy of Science, 44, 494–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. J.: 1981, ‘Natural Selection and Other Models in the Historiography of Science’, in Brewer and Collins, pp. 37–76.

  • Riedl, Rupert: 1984a, Biology of Knowledge: The Evolutionary Basis of Reason, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, Rupert: 1984b, ‘Evolution and Evolutionary Knowlege’, in Wuketits, F. M. (ed.), Concepts and Approches in Evolutionary Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1973a, ‘The Value of Analogical Models in Science’’, Dialogue 12, 246–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1973b, ‘The Nature of Scientific Models: Formal vs. Material Analogy’, Philosophy of Social Science 3, 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1977, ‘Karl Popper's Philosophy of Bilogy’, Philosophy of Science, 44, 638–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1983, ‘Darwin and Philosophy Today’, in Oldroyd, D. and Langham, I. (eds.), The Wider Domain of Evolutionary Thought, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 73–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1986, Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilpp, P. A. (ed.): 1974, The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, LaSalle, Ill.

  • Seitelberger, Franz: 1984, ‘Neurobiological Aspects of Interlligence’, in Wuketits, F. M. (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 123–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, A: 1971, ‘Perception from an Evolutionary Point of View’, Journal of Philosophy LXVIII 19, 571–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, A.: 1981, ‘Integral Epistemology’, in Brewer and Collins, pp. 98–123.

  • Shrader, Doughlas: 1980, ‘The Evolutionary Development of Science’, Review of Metaphysics, 34, 273–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg: 1982, ‘On a Relationship between the Theory of Selection and Epistemology’, in Plotkin, H. C., Learning, Development, and Culture, Wiley, New York, pp. 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1981, The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skagestad, P.: 1978, ‘Taking Evolution Seriously: Critical Comments on D. T. Campbell's Evolutionary Epistemology’, Monist 61, 611–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skagestad, P.: 1978, ‘C. S. Peirce on Biological Evolution and Scientific Progress’, Synthese 41, 85–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.: 1981, ‘Selection by Consequences’, Science 213, 501–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Terry L.: 1983, ‘Skinner's Environmentalism: The Analog With Natural Selection’, Behaviorism 11, 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A. Aaron: 1983, ‘Taxonomy and Theory’, in Asquith, P. D. and Nickels, T. (eds.), PSA 1982 2, 512–521.

  • Sober Elliot: 1981, ‘The Evolution of Rationality’, Synthese 46, 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somenzi, Vittoria: 1980, ‘Scientific Discovery From the Viewpoint of Evolutionary Epistemology’, in Grmk, M. D. Cohen, R. S., and Cimino, G. (eds.), On Scientific Discovery, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stent, G. (ed.): 1980, Morality as a Biological Phenomenon, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, B.: 1981a, ‘Evolution and the Necessity of Thought’, in Sumner, L. W., Slater, John G., and Wilson, Fred (eds.), Pragmatism and Purpose: Essays Presented to Thomas A. Goudge, 236–247.

  • Stroud, B.: 1981b, ‘The Significance of Naturalized Epistemology’ in French, P. A., Uehling, T. G. Jr., and Wettstein, Howard K. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy VI, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 455–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: 1977, The Structure of Scientific Theories, Second Edition, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, N: 1983, ‘In Defense of Evolutionary Epistemology’, Theoria 49, 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagart, P.: 1980, ‘Against Evolutionary Epistemology’, in Asquith, P. D. and Giere, R. N. (eds.), PSA 1980, 187–196.

  • Tennessen, H.: 1973a, ‘Knowledge versus Survival’, Inquiry, 16, 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennessen, H.: 1973b, ‘Rejoinder to Naess’, Inquiry 16, 417–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen E.: 1967a, ‘The Evolutionary Development of Natural Science’, American Scientist 55.

  • Toulmin, Stephen (ed.): 1970, Physical Reality, Harper, New York.

  • Toulmin, Stephen: 1972, Human Understanding: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen: 1974, ‘Rationality and Scientific Discovery’, in Schaffner, K. and Cohen, R. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science XX, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen: 1981a, ‘Evolution, Adaptation, and Human Understanding’, in Brewer and Collins, pp. 18–36.

  • Vollmer, G.: 1975, Evolutionare Erkenntnistheorie, S. Hirzel, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G.: 1984, ‘Mesocosm and Objective Knowledge’, in Wuketits, F. M. (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 69–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schilcher, F. and Tennant, N.: 1984, Philosophy, Evolution & Human Nature, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Gunter: 1984, ‘The Logical Basis of Evolutionary Epistemology’, in Wuketits, F. M. (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht. pp. 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O: 1978, On Human Nature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O.: 1980, Sociology: The New Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Abridged edition 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, Franz (ed.): 1984a, Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology: Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, Franz: 1954b, ‘Evolutionary Epistemology — A Challenge to Science and Philosophy’, in Wuketits, F. M. (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epitemology, Reidel, Dordrecht. pp. 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, Franz: 1984c, ‘Evolutionary Epistemology — A New Copernican Evolution?’, in Wuketits F. M. (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W. C.: 1981, ‘Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination’, in Brewer and Collins, pp. 124–163.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported, in part, by a grant from the National Science Foundation # SES—8308720. I want to thank Richard Lewontin and the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University for their hospitality and support during Spring 1984. I also want to thank David Hull, Charles Dyke and Michael Ruse for helpful comments on an earlier draft, and Andy Altman for pointing out to me the passage from Inherit the Wind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradie, M. Assessing evolutionary epistemology. Biol Philos 1, 401–459 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140962

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140962

Key words

Navigation