Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

General causal models in business ethics: An essay on colliding research traditions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The construction of causal models for research in business ethics has become fashionable in recent years. This paper explores four recent proposals, comparing and contrasting their views. The primary purpose of this paper is to expose several confusions inherent in such models and to account for these errors in terms of a failure to distinguish between “models as theories” and “models as representing a research tradition.” We conclude with a brief set of recommendations for linking two major research traditions in business ethics: empiricism and ethical theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bommer, M., Cratto C., Gravander J., Tuttle M.: 1987, ‘A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making’,Journal of Business Ethics 6(4), pp. 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, F. N.: 1988, ‘Practical Formalism: A New Methodological Proposal for Business Ethics’,Journal of Business Ethics 7(3), pp. 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, F. N.: 1990, ‘Constrained Managerial Decision making and Business Ethics: Are Merely “Satisfactory” Decisions Moral?’,Journal of Managerial Issues 2(4), pp. 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G.: 1963,A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, R.: 1969,Theory Building (The Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey, L.: 1981, ‘Strategic Management Decision Processes’,Strategic Management Journal 2 (January/March), pp. 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and Gresham, L. G.: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’,Journal of Marketing 49 (Spring), pp. 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiner, R.: 1982, ‘The Origin of Predictable Behavior’,American Economic Review 73 (September), pp. 560–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and Vitell, S.: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’,Journal of Macromarketing (Spring), pp. 5–16.

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969: ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-developmental Approach to Socialization’, in D. A. Goslin, ed.,Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research (Rand-McNally, Chicago), pp. 347–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1977:Progress and Its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth (University of California Press, Los Angeles).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., and Theoret A.: 1976, ‘The Structure of “Unstructured” Decision Processes’,Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (June), pp. 246–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E. and Ross, L.: 1980,Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings in Social Judgment (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.: 1955, ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (February), pp. 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.: 1956, ‘Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment’,Psychological Review 63 (March), pp. 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soelberg, P. O.: 1967, ‘Unprogrammed Decision Making’,Industrial Management Review 8 (Spring), pp. 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, W. E., Worrell, D. C., and Stead J. G.: 1990, ‘An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical behavior in Business Organizations’,Journal of Business Ethics 9(3), pp. 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-situation Interactionist Model’,Academy of Management Review 11(3), pp. 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1974, ‘Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’,Science 185, pp. 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.: 1979,The Social Psychology of Organizing, Second Edition (Addison-Wesley, Reading Massachusetts).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. San Diego State University, Department of Management, College of Business Administration, 92182-0096, San Diego, California, USA

    F. Neil Brady & Mary Jo Hatch

Authors
  1. F. Neil Brady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary Jo Hatch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

F. Neil Brady is Professor of Management at San Diego State University. He is the author ofEthical Managing: Rules and Results (Macmillan, 1990) and numerous articles on business ethics. His research focuses on the application of ethical theory to business decision making.

Mary Jo Hatch is an Associate Professor at San Diego State University and visiting Associate Professor at the Copenhagen Business School in Denmark. Her research interests include the link between business ethics and organizational culture, and humor in management teams. She has published articles on organizational culture and the behavioral and symbolic aspects of organizations as physical structures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brady, F.N., Hatch, M.J. General causal models in business ethics: An essay on colliding research traditions. J Bus Ethics 11, 307–315 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872173

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872173

Keywords

Search

Navigation