Abstract
When asked true-false questions that were too difficult to be answered correctly at better than a chance frequency, subjects often guessed in preference to admitting ignorance and often expressed certainty in the correctness of their answers. These tendencies were strongly correlated with the degree of expertise the subject believed himself to have in the area in which the question was asked. Under certain presumably ego-threatening conditions, subjects contradicted by answering “false” appreciably more often than they agreed by answering “true, ” although half the questions were, in fact, true and half were false.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mahoney, M. J. Scientist as subject: The psychological imperative. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger, 1976.
Mahoney, M. J. Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1977, 1, 161–175.
Mahoney, M. J., & DeMonbreun, B. G. Psychology of the scientist: An analysis of problem-solving bias. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1977, 1, 229–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The confidence rating procedure described for Experiment 2 was inspired by discussions with Darwin P. Hunt.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bradley, J.V. Overconfidence in ignorant experts. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 17, 82–84 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333674
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333674