Abstract
The Rhetoric to Alexander (second half of the fourth century B.C.) is among the oldest contributions to the study of argumentation. From antiquity on, this treatise, which abounds in opportunistic advice, has come under heavy criticism on normative grounds. And yet, as I shall maintain here, it clearly takes into account the requirements of rational argumentation which are still in use today. Moreover, it contains the seeds of a whole series of doctrines found in modern normative argumentation theory. There are reasonable grounds for maintaining that some of these modern doctrines stem indirectly from the tradition to which the Rhetoric to Alexander belongs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blair, J. A. and R. H. johnson: 1987, ‘Argumentation as Dialectical’, Argumentation 1, 41–56.
Braet, A.: 1987, ‘The Classical Doctrine of Status and the Rhetorical Theory of Argumentation’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 20, 79–93.
Buchheit, V.: 1960, Untersuchungen zur Theorie des Genos Epideiktikon von Gorgias bis Aristoteles, Hueber, München.
Cole, Th.: 1991, The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece, Johns Hopkins UP, Baltimore and London.
Cope, E. M.: 1867, An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric, with Analysis Notes and Appendices, Mac Millan, London, Cambridge.
Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
Eemeren, F. H. van and T. Kruiger: 1987, ‘Identifying Argumentation Schemes’, in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and Ch. A. Willard (eds.), Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 70–81.
Forster, E. S.: 9, ‘The Rhetorica ad Alexandrum’, in W. D. Ross (ed.), The Works of Aristotle, Vol. XI, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Fortenbaugh, W. W.: 1992, ‘Review of Cole (1991)’, Gnomon 65, 385–389.
Fuhrmann, M.: 1964, ‘Untersuchungen zur Textgeschichte der Pseudo-aristotelischen Alexander-Rhetorik (der Techne des Anaximenes von Lampsakos)’, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz. Abhandlungen der Geistes- un Sozia lwissenschaften Klasse 1964, nr. 7, 545–747.
Fuhrmann, M. (Hg.): 1966, Anaximenes, Ars Rhetorica, Teubner, Leipzig.
Fuhrmann, M.: 1984, Die Antike Rhetorik. Eine Einführung, Artemis, München und Zürich.
Kennedy, G.: 1963, The Art of Persuasion in Greece, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Kennedy, G.: 1980, Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Kennedy, G. A.: u1991, Aristotle On Rhetoric, A theory of Civic Discourse, Oxford University Press, New York and London.
Kienpointner, M.: 1992, Alltagslogik, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart.
Mirhady, D. C.: 1994, ‘Aristotle, the Rhetorica ad Alexandrum and the tria genera causarum’, in W. W. Fortenbaugh and D. C. Mirhady (eds.), Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle, Transaction Publisher, New Brunswick and London, pp. 54–65.
Nadeau, R.: 1958, ‘Hermogenes on ‘Stock Issues’ in Deliberative Speaking’, Speech Monographs 25, 59–66.
Perelman, Ch. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1958, La nouvelle rhétorique: traité de l'argumentation, l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
Rackham, H. (ed. and transl.): 1937, 1983, Rhetorica ad Alexandrum, Harvard University Press and Heinemann, Cambridge (Mass.) and London.
Schellens, P. J.: 1987, ‘Types of Argument and the Critical Reader’, in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard (eds.), Argumentation: Analysis and Practices, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 34–41.
Schenkeveld, D. M.: 1992, ‘Review of Cole (1991)’, Mnemosyne 45, 387–391.
Toulmin, St. E.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braet, A.C. On the origin of normative argumentation theory: The paradoxical case of the Rhetoric to Alexander . Argumentation 10, 347–359 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182200
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182200