Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T14:43:27.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Third Time Unlucky: A Study of Women who have Three or More Legal Abortions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Colin Brewer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Birmingham

Summary

Of 50 women who were having their third or subsequent legal abortion, 23 were pregnant because their contraceptive method had failed, 24 because of erratic contraceptive use, and three had changed their mind about an initially welcome pregnancy. There was a significant relationship between erratic use and a history of medical consultation for psychiatric reasons, and a suggestion that unsettled relationships and low educational status are also related to erratic use.

Inappropriate contraceptive advice was an important factor in several cases. Since the perfect contraceptive does not exist, and since some people are more unlucky than others, repeated abortion cannot be eliminated, but it may be reduced by giving especially careful contraceptive advice to those who are clearly at risk.

There is no evidence that abortion is being deliberately used as a method of birth control.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1977, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bracken, M.B., Hachamovitch, M. & Grossman, G. (1972) Correlates of repeat induced abortions. Obstet. Gynec., N. Y. 40,816.Google ScholarPubMed
Collhed, S. (1971) Värfor upprepade legala aborter? Svenska Läkartidningen, 68,2716.Google Scholar
Daily, E.F., Nicholas, N., Nelson, F. & Pakter, J. (1973) Repeat abortions in New York city: 1970–1972. Fam.Plann. Perspect. 5,89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobsson, L., Von Schoulz, B. & Solheim, F. (1976) Repeat aborters–first aborters, a social–psychiatric comparison. Soc.Psychiat. 11,75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, J. (1974) Report of the Committee on the Working of the Abortion Act, Vol. 3. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Lidz, R.W. (1969) Emotional factors in the success of contraception. Fert. Steril. 20, 761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luker, K. (1975) Taking Chances. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovinsky, J.J. (1972) Abortion recidivism—a problem in preventive medicine. Obstet. Gynec., N. Y. 39, 649.Google ScholarPubMed
Ryder, N.B. (1973) Contraceptive failure in the United States. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 5, 133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandberg, B.C. & Jacobs, R.I. (1971) Psychology of the misuse and rejection of contraception. Am.J. Obstet. Gynec. 110, 227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tietze, C. & Lewit, S. (1972) Joint program for the study of abortion (JPSA): early medical complications of legal abortion. Stud. Fam. Plann. 3, (6), 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar