The hand is the window on to the mind.
Immanuel Kant (quoted from Sennett 2008, p. 149).
Abstract
Western philosophy has been greatly influenced by visual metaphors. Knowing something has commonly, yet implicitly, been conceptualized as seeing something clearly, learning has been framed as being visually exposed to something, and the mind has been understood as a ‘mirror of nature’. A whole ‘epistemology of the eye’ has been at work, which has had significant practical implications, not least in educational contexts. One way to characterize John Dewey’s pragmatism is to see it as an attempt to replace the epistemology of the eye with an epistemology of the hand. This article develops the epistemology of the hand on three levels: A level of embodiment and metaphors, of craftsmanship and social practices, and of schooling and education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biesta, G. (2004). Against learning: Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 24, 70–82.
Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Homo academicvs. Californien: Stanford University Press.
Brinkmann, S. (2004). Psychology as a moral science: Aspects of John Dewey’s psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 17, 1–28.
Brinkmann, S. (2006). John Dewey—en introduktion. [John Dewey—an introduction]. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Brinkmann, S. (2008). Culture as practices: A pragmatist conception. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 28, 192–212.
Condliffe Lagemann, E. (1989). The plural worlds of educational research. History of Education Quarterly, 29, 184–214.
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. The Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.
Dewey, J. (1900). The school and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. This edition published 1969.
Dewey, J. (1920). Reconstruction in philosophy. Boston: The Beacon Press. Second enlarged edition published 1948.
Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York: The Modern Library. This edition published 1930.
Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. Chicago: Open Court.
Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty. New York: Capricorn Books. This edition 1960.
Garrison, J. (1999). John Dewey’s theory of practical reasoning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31, 291–312.
Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional “trans-action”: An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8, 275–296.
Jalil, P. A., & Boujettif, M. (2005). Some characteristics of nobel laureates. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2), 265–272.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company. This edition 1981.
Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kivinen, O., & Piiroinen, T. (2006). Toward pragmatist methodological relationalism: From philosophizing sociology to sociologizing philosophy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36, 303–329.
Kvale, S. (1999). Forskere i lære. [Research apprentices] In K. Nielsen & S. Kvale (Eds.), Mesterlære–læring som social praksis. [Apprenticeship–Learning as social practice] (pp. 178–197). København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Kvale, S. (2004). Frigørende pædagogik som frigørende til forbrug. [Emancipatory education as emancipating to consumption]. In J. Krejsler (Ed.), Kampen om individet. [The struggle of the individual] (pp. 32–62). København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
LaFollette, H. (2000). Pragmatic ethics. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), The blackwell guide to ethical theory (pp. 400–419). Oxford: Blackwell.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindström, L. (2007). Creativity: What is it? Can you assess it? Can it be taught? JADE, 25, 53–66.
Menand, L. (2002). The metaphysical club. London: Flamingo.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge. This edition published 2002.
Mishler, E. G. (1999). Storylines. London: Harvard University Press.
Osberg, D., Biesta, G., & Cilliers, P. (2008). From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40, 213–227.
Putnam, H. (1995). Pragmatism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character. New York: Norton.
Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tanggaard, L. (2008). Kreativitet skal læres—når talent bliver til innovation. [Creativity must be learned—when talent becomes innovation]. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for generous comments that have helped improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brinkmann, S., Tanggaard, L. Toward an Epistemology of the Hand. Stud Philos Educ 29, 243–257 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-009-9164-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-009-9164-0