Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic inconsistency and choice

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze an intra-personal game where a decision-maker is summarized by a succession of selves. Selves may (or may not) have conflicting interests, and earlier selves may have imperfect knowledge of the preferences of future selves. At date 1, self-1 chooses a menu, at date 2, the preferences of self-2 realize and self-2 chooses an item from the menu. We show that equilibrium choice is consistent with either a preference for flexibility, a preference for betweenness or a preference for systematic restriction. Overall, the analysis reconciles the decision–theoretic approach of choice over time with the game–theoretic multiple-selves approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benhabib J., Bisin A. (2005) Modelling internal commitment-mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-savings decisions. Games and Economic Behavior 52: 460–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim B. D., Rangel A. (2004) Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. American Economic Review 4(5): 1558–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou R., Pycia M. (2002) Dynamic inconsistency and self control: A planner-doer interpretation. Economic Letters 77(3): 419–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brocas I., Carrillo J. D. (2008a) Theories of the mind. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 98(2): 175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brocas I., Carrillo J. D. (2008b) The brain as a hierarchical organization. American Economic Review 98(4): 1312–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K. & Krishna V. (2008). A “Dual Self” representation for stochastic temptation. American Economic Journal, Microeconomics (forthcoming).

  • Dekel E, Lipman B. L., Rustichini A. (2001) Representing preferences with a unique subjective state space. Econometrica 79(4): 891–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D., Levine D. K. (2006) A dual self model of impulse control. American Economic Review 96: 1449–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul F., Pesendorfer W. (2001) Dynamic inconsistency and self-control. Econometrica 69(6): 1403–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps D. (1979) A representation theorem for preference for flexibility. Econometrica 47(3): 565–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laibson D. (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 443–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehring K. (2006) Self-control through second-order preferences. University of California Davis, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin H., Thaler R. (1988) The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis. Economic Inquiry 26(4): 609–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strotz R. H. (1955) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies 23: 165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler R., Shefrin H. M. (1981) An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy 89: 392–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Brocas.

Additional information

This research has benefited from early discussions with Marc Henry. I am also grateful to Juan Carrillo for comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brocas, I. Dynamic inconsistency and choice. Theory Decis 71, 343–364 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-009-9183-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-009-9183-x

Keywords

Navigation