Skip to main content
Log in

The computer-mediated public sphere and the cosmopolitan ideal

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to the attractive moral and politicalmodel of cosmopolitanism, this paper offers anoverview of some of the conceptual limitations to thatmodel arising from computer-mediated, interest-basedsocial interaction. I discuss James Bohman'sdefinition of the global and cosmopolitan spheres andhow computer-mediated communication might impact thedevelopment of those spheres. Additionally, I questionthe commitment to purely rational models of socialcooperation when theorizing a computer-mediated globalpublic sphere, exploring recent alternatives. Andfinally, I discuss a few of the political andepistemic constraints on participation in thecomputer-mediated public sphere that threaten thecosmopolitan ideal.``Nature should be thanked for fostering socialincompatibility, enviously competitive vanity, andinsatiable desires for possessions and even power.Without these desires, all man's excellent naturalcapacities would never be roused to develop.'' Theultimate destiny for mankind, according to Kant whowrote these words in 1784, is to achieve through theuse of reason a `cosmopolitan existence' or ``thematrix within which all the original capacities of thehuman race may develop.'' Ironically, however, as Habermas andothers have realized, Kant's carefully developedvision for `perpetual peace' among nations and `worldcitizenship' is now murky even as the electronicallymediated infrastructure of that matrix is rapidlydeveloping. Globalization as a process has intensifiedto the point where a new social, political, andeconomic condition has taken hold in the global arena.Recently this condition has been termed ``globality'' –a term denoting a networked world characterized byspeed, mobility, risk, insecurity, andflexibility. And a debate is forming around thequestion of whether we are still in late modernity andexperiencing the culmination of modernity's inherentlyglobalizing tendency or instead we have entered thenetworked age, in which the tension between collectiveand transformative identities and the networking logicof dominant institutions and organizations heralds theend of civil society. Inthis paper assume the latter but wish to explorefurther the political and epistemic constraints onparticipation in the computer-mediated public sphere.These constraints seem certain to impact the viabilityof a cosmopolitan public sphere. In the first sectionI shall discuss James Bohman's definition of theglobal and cosmopolitan spheres and howcomputer-mediated communication (hereafter CMC) mightimpact the development of those spheres. In the secondsection, I question the commitment to purely rationalmodels of social cooperation when theorizing a globalpublic sphere. I explore recently proposed alternativeways of thinking about this issue in section three.And finally, I discuss a few of the political andepistemic constraints on participation in thecomputer-mediated public sphere that threaten thecosmopolitan ideal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hannah Arendt. The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Axelrod. The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41: 203–26, 1997. Reprinted In The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Cooperation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon Blackburn. Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Bohman. The Globalization of the Public Sphere: Cosmopolitan Publicity and Cultural Pluralism. The Modern Schoolman, 75: 101–117, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Bohman and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann, editors. Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant's Cosmopolitan Ideal. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip Brey. Space-Shaping Technologies and the Geographical Disembedding of Place. In Andrew Light and Jonathan M.0020 Smith, editors, Philosophy and Geography, Vol. III. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel Castells. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, Vols. I-III. Blackwell, Oxford, 1996, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward Craig. Knowledge and the State of Nature-An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean-Pierre Dupuy. Myths of the Informational Society. In Kathleen Woodward, editor, The Myths of Information: Technology and Postindustrial Culture, pp. 3–17. Coda Press, Madison, Wisconsin, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshua M. Epstein and Robert Axtell. Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda Fricker. Rational Authority and Social Power: Towards a Truly Social Epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (98): 159–177, 1998.

  • Francis Fukuyama. Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis Fukuyama. The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. Free Press, New York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Gauthier. Morals by Agreement. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Giddens. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony Giddens. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvin Goldman. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgen Habermas. Kant's Idea of Perpetual Peace, with the Benefit of Two Hundred Years' Hindsight. In James Bohman and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann, editors, Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant's Cosmopolitan Ideal, pp. 113–154. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgen Habermas. The European Nation-State. In Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greiff, editors, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, pp. 105–128. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgen Habermas. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (translated by William Rehg). MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean Hampton. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean Hampton. Free-Rider Problems in the Production of Collective Goods. Economics and Philosophy, 3: 245–273, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Held. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Held. Cosmopolitan Democracy and the Global Order: A New Agenda. In James Bohman and Matthias Lutz-Bachmann, editors, Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant's Cosmopolitan Ideal, pp. 235–252. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel Imbo. The Cyberspace Metaphor for Community. In M.J. Van den Hoven, editor, Proceedings of Computer Ethics Philosophical Enquiry. Erasmus University Rotterdam, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory Kavka. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immanuel Kant. Political Writings (edited by H. Reiss and translated by H. B. Nisbet). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jody Kraus. The Limits of Hobbesian Contractarianism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karen Ordahl Kupperman, editor. America in European Consciousness, 1493–1750. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill and London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark Poster. Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the Public Sphere. In David Porter, editor, Internet Culture. Routledge, New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchel Resnick. Turtles, Termites, and Traffic Jams: Explorations in Massively Parallel Microworlds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C. Schelling. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. W.W. Norton & Co., New York and London, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • John R. Searle. The Construction of Social Reality. Free Press, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amartya Sen. On Ethics and Economics. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny Shearer. The Campaign for an Ethical Internet. Computers and Society, 28: 80–85, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian Skyrms. Chaos and the Explanatory Significance of Equilibrium: Strange Attractors in Evolutionary Game Dynamics. In Cristina Bicchieri, Richard Jeffrey, and Brian Skyrms, editors, The Dynamics of Norms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian Skyrms. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen Toulmin. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimo Tuomela. The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimo Tuomela. From Social Imitation to Teamwork. In Ghita Holmström and Raimo Tuomela, editors, Contemporary Action Theory, Vol. II. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry Wellman. The Community Question Re-evaluated. In Michael Peter Smith, editor, Power, Community and the City. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry Wellman. The Network Community. In Barry Wellman, editor, Networks in the Global Village. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry Wellman. An Electronic Group is Virtually a Social Network. In Sara Kiesler, editor, The Culture of the Internet. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry Wellman and Milena Gulia. Virtual Communities As Communities. In Marc A. Smith and Peter Kollock, editors, Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge, London, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw. The Commanding Heights: The Battle Between Government and the Marketplace That Is Remaking the Modern World. Simon & Schuster, NY, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brothers, R. The computer-mediated public sphere and the cosmopolitan ideal. Ethics and Information Technology 2, 91–97 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010073319706

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010073319706

Navigation