Skip to main content
Log in

The good life of creatures with dignity some comments on the swiss expert opinion

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The notion of Dignity of Creatures has been voted into the Swiss Federal Constitution by a plebiscite. Philipp Balzer, Klaus-Peter Rippe, and Peter Schaber have given an expert opinion for the Swiss government to clarify the notion of Dignity of Creatures. According to them, by voting this notion into the Swiss constitution, the Swiss have chosen for a limited biocentric approach towards biotechnology. In such an approach genetic engineering of non-human beings is only allowed insofar that their own good is not impaired. It is, however, not clear when the good of a non-human being is impaired. I defend the position that — even if we confine ourselves to animals — their good goes beyond their well being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Broom, F. W. A., “Animal Welfare, Public Policy and Ethics,” in M. Dol, S. Kasanmoentalib, S. Lijmbach, E. Riva, and R. Van den Bos (eds.),Animal conscious-ness and Animal Ethics: Perspectives from the Netherlands (Van Gorcum, Assen, 1997), pp. 208–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brom, F. W. A., “Background of the Use of ‘Intrinsic Value of Animals’ in the Netherlands,” in M. Dol, M. Fentener van Vlissingen, S. Kasanmoentalib, Th. Visser, and H. Zwart (eds.),Recognizing the Intrinsic Value of Animals: Beyond Animal Welfare (Van Gorcum, Assen, 1998), pp. 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom, D. M., “Animal Welfare: Concepts and Measurement,”Journal for Animal Science 69 (1991), 4167–4175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L.,On the Nature of Health: An Action-theoretic Approach (Kluwer/Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pursel, V. G., C. A. Pinkert, K. F. Miller, D. J. Bolt, R. G. Campbell, R. D. Palmiter, R. L. Brinster, and R. E. Hammer, “Genetic Engineering of Livestock,”Science 244 (1989), 1281–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroten, E., “The ‘Herman Case’: The Usefulness of the Wide Reflective Equilibrium Model for Ethics Committees,” in W. van der Burg and T. van Willigenburg (eds.),Reflective Equilibrium (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998), pp. 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P., “Life’s, Uncertain Voyage,” in P. Petit, R. Sylvan, and J. Norman (eds.),Metaphysics and Morality (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, 1987), pp. 154–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Burg, W., “Legislation on Human Embryos: from Status Theories to Value Theories,”Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 82 (1996), 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Reenen, C. G. and H. J. Blokhuis, “Investigating Welfare of Dairy Calves Involved in Genetic Modification: Problems and Perspectives,”Livestock Production Science 36 (1993), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brom, F.W.A. The good life of creatures with dignity some comments on the swiss expert opinion. J Agric Environ Ethics 13, 53–63 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694135

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694135

Key Words

Navigation