Skip to main content
Log in

The classical limit of quantum theory

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both physicists and philosophers claim that quantum mechanics reduces to classical mechanics as ħ→0, that classical mechanics is a limiting case of quantum mechanics. If so, several formal and non-formal conditions must be satisfied. These conditions are satisfied in a reduction using the Wigner transformation to map quantum mechanics onto the classical phase plane. This reduction does not, however, assist in providing an adequate metaphysical interpretation of quantum theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, J.: 1966, ‘On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics’, Reviews of Modern Physics 38, 447–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Niels: 1949, ‘Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher Scientist, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, pp. 199–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, David: 1951, Quantum Theory, Prentice Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, L.: 1966, ‘Can quantum mechanics be formulated as a classical probability theory’, Philosophy of Science 33, 317–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant, R. and Hilbert, D.: 1937, Methods of Mathematical Physics, Volume 1, Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul: 1962, ‘Explanation, reduction, and empiricism’, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell, (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 3, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, pp. 28–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Michael: 1974, ‘Explanation and scientific understanding’, Journal of Philosophy 71, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furth, R.: 1933, ‘Über einige Beziehungen zwischen klassischer Statistik und Quantenmechanik’, Zeitschrift für Physik 81, 143–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, Clark: 1970, ‘On some patterns of reduction’, Philosophy of Science 37, 340–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, Kurt: 1966, Quantum Mechanics, W. A. Benjamin, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewald, H. J.: 1946, ‘On the principles of quantum mechanics’, Physica 12, 405–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home, Roderick W.: 1968, ‘The third law in Newton's mechanics’, British Journal for the History of Science 4, 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khinchin, A. I.: 1949, Mathematical Foundation of Statistical Mechanics, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochen, S. and Specker, E. P.: 1967, ‘The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E.: 1893, The Science of Mechanics, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, P. and Feshbach, H.: 1953, Methods of Theoretical Physics, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyal, J. E.: 1949, ‘Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 45, 99–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J.: 1955, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, Reese: 1966, ‘A new formulation of particle mechanics’, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, No. 61.

  • Schaffner, Kenneth: 1967, ‘Approaches to reduction’, Philosophy of Science 34, 137–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E.: 1931, ‘Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze’, Berliner Sitzungsberichte, 144–53.

  • Schrödinger, E.: 1932, ‘Sur la théorie relativiste de l'électron et l'interpretation de la mécanique quantique’, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré 2, 269–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, Lawrence: 1967, ‘Types of inter-theoretic reduction’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18, 109–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Howard: 1972, ‘On the conceptual structure of quantum mechanics’, in R. Colodny (ed.), Paradigms and Paradoxes, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 367–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudarshan, E. C. G.: 1962, ‘Structure of dynamical theories’, Lectures in Theoretical Physics, Brandeis Summer Institute of 1961, Benjamin, Inc., New York, 143–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, E.: 1932, ‘On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium’, The Physical Review 40, 749–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, E.: 1967, Symmetries and Reflections, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Earlier versions of this essay received helpful criticism from Bruce Knight, Clark Glymour, and Donald Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruer, J.T. The classical limit of quantum theory. Synthese 50, 167–212 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00416901

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00416901

Keywords

Navigation