Abstract
I consider to what extent the phenomenon of interference precludes the possibility of attributing simultaneously determinate values to noncommuting observables, and I show that, while all observables can in principle be taken as simultaneously determinate, it suffices to take a suitable privileged observable as determinate to solve the measurement problem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, D. Z.: 1992,Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Bell, J. S.: 1987,Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bohm, D.: 1952, ‘A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables’, I and II,Phys. Rev. 85, 166–79, 180–93.
Bohm, D. and Hiley, B. J.: 1993,The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge, London.
Kochen, S. and Specker, E. P.: 1967, ‘On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics’,J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87.
Van Fraassen, B. C.: 1991,Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Vink, J.: 1993, ‘Quantum mechanics in terms of discrete beables’,Phys. Rev. A 48, 1808–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bub, J. Interference, noncommutativity, and determinateness in quantum mechanics. Topoi 14, 39–43 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763477
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763477