Skip to main content
Log in

Modalities in linear logic weaker than the exponential “of course”: Algebraic and relational semantics

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a semantic study of a family of modal intuitionistic linear systems, providing various logics with both an algebraic semantics and a relational semantics, to obtain completeness results. We call modality a unary operator □ on formulas which satisfies only one rale (regularity), and we consider any subsetW of a list of axioms which defines the exponential “of course” of linear logic. We define an algebraic semantics by interpreting the modality □ as a unary operationμ on an IL-algebra. Then we introduce a relational semantics based on pretopologies with an additional binary relationr between information states. The interpretation of □ is defined in a suitable way, which differs from the traditional one in classical modal logic. We prove that such models provide a complete semantics for our minimal modal system, as well as, by requiring the suitable conditions onr (in the spirit of correspondence theory), for any of its extensions axiomatized by any subsetW as above. We also prove an embedding theorem for modal IL-algebras into complete ones and, after introducing the notion of general frame, we apply it to obtain a duality between general frames and modal IL-algebras.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battilotti, G. and Sambin, G.: 1993, ‘Presentation of quantales and locales by means of pretopologies’,Preprint, Dip. di Matematica Pura e Appl., Univ. di Padova.

  • Benthem van, J.: 1985,Modal logic and classical logic, Bibliopolis, Napoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthem van, J.: 1986, ‘Correspondence theory’, pp. 167–247 inHandbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol II: Extensions of Classical Logic, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, eds., Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, J. Y.: 1987, ‘Linear logic’,Theoretical Computer Science 50, 1–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H.: 1992, ‘Algebraic aspects of logics without structurales rules’,Contemporary Mathematics 131, (Part 3), 601–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H.: 1993, ‘Semantics for Substructural Logics’, pp. 259–291 inSubstructurals Logics, P. Schroeder-Heister and K. Došen, eds, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambin, G.: 1992, ‘Pretopologies and completeness proofs’,Preprint, Dip. di Matematica Pura e Appl., Univ. di Padova.

  • Sambin, G.: 1993, ‘The semantics of pretopologies’, pp. 293–307 inSubstructurals Logics, P. Schroeder-Heister and K. Došen, eds, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambin, G., Valentini, S. and Virgili, P.: 1992, ‘Constructive domain theory as a branch of intuitionistic pointfree topology’,Preprint, Dip. di Matematica Pura e Appl., Univ. di Padova.

  • Troelstra, A. S.: 1992, ‘Lectures on linear logic’,CSLI Lectures Notes 29, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bucalo, A. Modalities in linear logic weaker than the exponential “of course”: Algebraic and relational semantics. J Logic Lang Inf 3, 211–232 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053246

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053246

Key words

Navigation