Skip to main content
Log in

Stakeholder Theory and Public Policy: How Governments Matter

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Social Issues in Management Division has had a long history of research into various aspects of governmental influences on business. Recent years, however, have seen stakeholder theory sort of sweep the field, and under a stakeholder theory of capitalism, governments will matter less then they have in the past as stakeholder principles are implemented throughout the corporate world. This article will examine the nature of this claim by discussing problems with the implementation of stakeholder theory and examining the role of public policy in our society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, F.: 1951, ‘Management's Responsibilities in a Complex World’, Harvard Business Review 24(3), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Academy of Management.: 2000, 'Call for Submissions: Academy of Management Washington, D.C. 2001 Conference.

  • Buchholz, R. A.: 1977, ‘An alternative to Social Responsibility’, MSU Business Topics 25(3), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, R. A.: 1992, 'Business Environment and Public Policy (4th ed.) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1996, Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management (3rd ed.) (Southwestern, Cincinnati).

  • Chamberlain, N. W.: 1973, The Limits of Corporate Responsibility (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. et al.: 1994, ‘The Toronto Conference: Reflections on Stakeholder Theory’, Business & Society 33, 83–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E. (ed.): 1998, The Corporation and its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for Economic Development.: 1971, Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations (Committee for Economic Development, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.: 1998, ‘Foreword: Redefining the Corporation’, in M.B.E. Clarkson (ed.), The Corporation and its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings: vii–viii (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C.: 1992, ‘Social Issues in Management: Coming of Age or Prematurely Gray?’ Paper presented to the Doctoral Consortium of the Social Issues in Management Division. The Academy of Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1998, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation’, in M. B. E. Clarkson (ed.), The Corporation and its Stakeholders: Classic and contemporary Readings (University of Toronto Press, Toronto), pp. 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine 13(Sept.), 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoux, A. M.: 2000, ‘Business Ethics Gone Wrong’, Cato Policy Report 22(3), 1, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L. E. and Post, J. E.: 1975, Private Management and Public Policy (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. B. and Buchholz, R. A.: 2000, Rethinking Business Ethics: A Pragmatic Approach (Oxford, New York).

  • Rowley, T. and Berman, S.: 2000, ‘A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance’, Business and Society 39, 397–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C.: 1993, Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, D. R. and Freeman, R. H.: 1994, ‘A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 475–497.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchholz, R.A., Rosenthal, S.B. Stakeholder Theory and Public Policy: How Governments Matter. Journal of Business Ethics 51, 143–153 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033608.61005.1f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033608.61005.1f

Navigation