Skip to main content
Log in

Etiological Theories of Function: A Geographical Survey

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Formulations of the essential commitment of the etiological theory of functions have varied significantly, with some individual authors' formulations even varying from one place to another. The logical geography of these various formulations is different from what is standardly assumed; for they are not stylistic variants of the same essential commitment, but stylistic variants of two non-equivalent versions of the etiological theory. I distinguish these “strong” and “weak” versions of the etiological theory (which differ with respect to the role of selection in their definitions of function), draw out their respective implications, and argue that the weak version is to be preferred to the strong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, C. and Bekoff, M.: 1995, 'Biological Function, Adaptation, and Natural Design', Philosophy of Science 62, 609–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson, R. and Lauder, G.V.: 1994, 'Function Without Purpose: The Uses of Causal Role Function in Evolutionary Biology', Biology and Philosophy 9, 443–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.R. and Bellis, M.A.: 1995, Human Sperm Competition: Copulation, Masturbation, and Infidelity, Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.N.: 1990, Adaptation and Environment, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D.J.: 1997, 'Individualism and Evolutionary Psychology (or: In Defense of “Narrow” Functions)', Philosophy of Science 64, 74–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J.F.: 1979, 'Genes that Violate Mendel's Rules', Scientific American 240(2), 134–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1975, 'Functional Analysis', Journal of Philosophy 72, 741–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A.: 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P.: 1993, 'Functions: Consensus Without Unity', Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74, 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P.: 1994, 'A Modern History Theory of Functions', Noûs 28, 344–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C.: 1979, 'The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme', Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205, 581–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P.E.: 1993, 'Functional Analysis and Proper Function', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44, 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1993, 'Function and Design', Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18, 379–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyttle, T.W.: 1993, 'Cheaters Sometimes Prosper: Distortion of Mendelian Segregation by Meiotic Drive', Trends in Genetics 9, 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1993, The Theory of Evolution (Canto ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1988, 'An Analysis of the Concept of Natural Selection', in Toward a New Philosophy of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G.: 1984, Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G.: 1989a, 'An Ambiguity in the Notion “Function”', Biology and Philosophy 4, 172–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G.: 1989b, 'In Defense of Proper Functions', Philosophy of Science 56, 288–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G.: 1993, 'Propensities, Exaptations, and the Brain', in White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S.D.: 1995, 'Function, Fitness and Disposition', Biology and Philosophy 10, 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K.: 1991a, 'Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense', Philosophy of Science 58, 168–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K.: 1991b, 'The Teleological Notion of “Function”', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69, 454–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K.: 1995, 'Pruning the Tree of Life', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivinski, J.: 1984, 'Sperm in Competition', in R.L. Smith (ed.), Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, Academic Press, New York, pp. 85–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1995, 'Natural Selection and Distributive Explanation: A Reply to Neander', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 384–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D.M. and Ariew, A.: 1996, 'A Taxonomy of Functions', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26, 493–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buller, D.J. Etiological Theories of Function: A Geographical Survey. Biology & Philosophy 13, 505–527 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006559512367

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006559512367

Navigation