Skip to main content
Log in

The logic of thought experiments

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I argue that (at least many) philosophical thought experiments are unreliable. But I argue that this notion of unreliability has to be understood relative to the goal of thought experiments as knowledge producing. And relative to that goal many thought experiments in science are just as unreliable. But in fact thought experiments in science play a varied role and I will suggest that knowledge production is a goal only under quite limited circumstances. I defend the view that these circumstances can (sometimes) arise in philosophy as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, J.: 1991, The Laboratory of the Mind, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1979, ‘Individualism and the Mental’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 4, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 73–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1921, Relativity, Henry Holt and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1949, ‘Autobiographical Notes’, in A. Schlipp (ed.), Albert Einstein Philosopher-Scientist, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. and L. Infeld: 1938, The Evolution of Physics, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo, G.: 1974, Two New Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madsion Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettier, E.: 1963, ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis 23, 121–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M.: 1987, ‘Human Beings’, Journal of Philosophy 84, 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E: 1942, The Science of Mechanics, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E.: 1976, Knowledge and Error, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I.: 1934, Mathematical Principles, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.: 1991, ‘Thought Experiments in Einstein's Work’, in T. Horowitz and G. Massey (eds.), Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, Maryland, pp. 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of Meaning’, Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1991, ‘Thought Experimentation in Presocratic Philosophy’, in T. Horowitz and G. Massey (eds.), Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, Maryland, pp. 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, R.: 1992, Thought Experiments, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.: 1971, ‘A Defense of Abortion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, K.: 1988, Real People, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bunzl, M. The logic of thought experiments. Synthese 106, 227–240 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413701

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413701

Keywords

Navigation