The logic of thought experiments

25Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper I argue that (at least many) philosophical thought experiments are unreliable. But I argue that this notion of unreliability has to be understood relative to the goal of thought experiments as knowledge producing. And relative to that goal many thought experiments in science are just as unreliable. But in fact thought experiments in science play a varied role and I will suggest that knowledge production is a goal only under quite limited circumstances. I defend the view that these circumstances can (sometimes) arise in philosophy as well. © 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bunzl, M. (1996). The logic of thought experiments. Synthese, 106(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413701

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free