Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimating the incidence of wrongdoing and whistle-blowing: Results of a study using randomized response technique

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Student cheating and reporting of that cheating represents one form of organizational wrong-doing and subsequent whistle-blowing, in the context of an academic organization. Previous research has been hampered by a lack of information concerning the validity of survey responses estimating the incidence of organizational wrongdoing and whistle-blowing. An innovative method, the Randomized Response Technique (RRT), was used here to assess the validity of reported incidences of wrongdoing and whistle-blowing. Surprisingly, our findings show that estimates of these incidences did not vary significantly when RRT questionnaire results were compared to those obtained from standard surveys. In fact, a large number of business undergraduates admitted cheating while only a small percentage reported peers' cheating when they observed it. These results should be sobering for managers and their implications are considered in some detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy, J. R., B. G. Greenberg and D. G. Horvitz: 1970, ‘Estimates of Induced Abortion in Urban North Carolina’,Demography 7(1), 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abul-Ela, A. A., B. G. Greenberg and D. G. Horvitz: 1967, ‘A Multi-Proportions Randomized Response Model’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, 990–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, D. C. and J. C. Dalton: 1981, ‘Why College Students Cheat’,Journal of College Student Personnel, Nov., 545–551.

  • Baucus, M. S. and J. P. Near: 1991, ‘Can Illegal Corporate Behavior be Predicted?’,Social Psychology 40, 290–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. E., G. B. Harwood and J. L. Katz: 1987, ‘Performance of Auditing Procedures by Governmental Auditors: Some Preliminary Evidence’,The Accounting Review 63(1), 14–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, M. S.: 1988,Employee Dissent: The Choice of Voice Versus Silence (unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, P. D.: 1982, ‘Randomized Response Multivariate Designs for Categorical Data’,Communications in Statistics-Theory Methods 11, 2889–2901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunning, J. L. and B. L. Kintz: 1977,Computational Handbook of Statistics 2nd ed. (Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchman, T. A. and J. A. Tracy: 1982, ‘Obtaining Responses to Sensitive Questions: Conventional Questionnaire versus Randomized Response Technique’,Journal of Accounting Research 20, 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchman, T. A.: 1983, ‘The Reliability of Internal Auditors' Working Papers’,Auditing 3(1), 92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. W., L. A. Marascuilo and P. Busk: 1982, ‘Optimal Randomized Response Models and Methods for Hypothesis Testing’,Journal of Educational Statistics 7(4), 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Columbus Dispatch, April, 8, 1987. Therapists' Sexual Misconduct Covered Up, 2B.

  • Corcoran, K. J. and J. B. Rotter, 1987, ‘Morality-Conscience Guilt Scale as a Predictor of Ethical Behavior in a Cheating Situation’,Journal of General Psychology 114, 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covey, M. K., Saladin, S. and P. J. Killen: 1989, ‘Self-Monitoring, Surveillance, and Incentive Effects on Cheating’,Journal of Social Psychology 129(5), 673–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. R: 1976, ‘Restraint of Trade, Recidivism, and Delinquent Neighborhoods’. In J. F. Short (ed.)Delinquency, Crime and Society (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P. and D. Marlowe: 1960, ‘A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathology’,Journal of Consulting Psychology 24, 349–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R. and M. B. Metzger: 1992, ‘Towards Candor, Cooperation, and Privacy in Applied Business Ethics Research: The Randomized Response Technique’,Business Ethics Quarterly 2, 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J. C. and J. J. Waterton: 1984, ‘Randomized Response Models for Estimating the Distribution Function of a Quantitative Character’,International Statistical Review 52(2), 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, A. M. I. and M. J. Lichtenstein: 1983, ‘Response Bias in Self-Report Surveys: Evaluating Randomized Response’. In G. P. Waldo (ed.)Measurement Issues in Criminal Justice (Sage, Beverly Hills, Cal.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgell, S. E., S. Himmelfarb and K. L. Duchan: 1982, ‘Validity of Forced Responses in a Randomized Response Model’,Sociological Methods and Research 11, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgell, S. E., S. Himmelfarb and D. J. Cira: 1986, ‘Statistical Efficiency of Using Two Quantitative Randomized Response Techniques to Estimate Correlation’,Psychological Bulletin 100(2), 251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn, B. H. and L. S. Hayre: 1983, ‘Scrambled Randomized Response Methods for Obtaining Sensitive Quantitative Data’,Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 7, 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folsom, R. E., B. G. Greenberg, D. G. Horvitz and J. R. Abernathy: 1973, ‘The Two Alternate Questions Randomized Response Model for Human Surveys’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 68, 525–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, M. D., R. R. Andrus and J. Reinmuth: 1976, ‘Researching Shoplifting and Other Deviant Customer Behavior, Using the Randomized Response Research Design’,Journal of Retailing 51(4), 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, M. P. and P. M. Glazer: 1987, ‘Pathways to Resistance: An Ethical Odyssey in Government and Industry’, in M. Lewis and J. L. Miller (eds.)Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 4 (JAI Press, Greenwich), pp. 193–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, M. P. and P. M. Glazer: 1989,The Whistle-Blowers: Exposing Corruption in Government and Industry (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstadt, M. S. & V. Gruson: 1975, ‘The Randomized Response Technique: A Test on Drug Use.Journal of the American Statistical Association 70, 814–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstadt, M. S., G. Cook and V. Gruson: 1978, ‘The Validity of Reported Drug Use: The Randomized Response Technique’,International Journal of the Addictions 13, 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B. G., A. A. Abul-Ela, W. R. Simmons and D. G. Horvitz: 1969, ‘The Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model: Theoretical Framework’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 64, 520–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B. G., R. R. Kuebler, Jr., J. R. Abernathy and D. G. Horvitz: 1971, ‘Application of the Randomized Response Technique in Obtaining Quantitative Data’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., G. M. Diekhoff, E. E. LaBeff and R. E. Clark: 1986, ‘College Cheating: Immaturity, Lack of Commitment, and the Neutralizing Attitude’,Research in Higher Education 25(4), 342–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, D. G., B. G. Greenberg and J. R. Abernathy: 1976, ‘Randomized Response: A Data Gathering Device for Sensitive Questions’,International Statistical Review 44(2), 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, D. G., B. G. Greenberg and J. R. Abernathy: 1990, ‘Recent Developments in Randomized Response Design’, In J. N. Srivastava (ed.),A Survey of Statistical Design and Linear Models (Elsevier Publishing, New York), pp. 271–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • I-cheng, C., L. P. Chow and R. V. Rider: 1972, ‘The Randomized Response Technique as Used in the Taiwan Pregnancy Study’,Studies in Family Planning 2, 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P.: 1988a, ‘Communication Climate, Whistle-blowing, and the First-Level Manager: A Preliminary Study’,Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings 40, 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P.: 1988b, ‘Communication Climate, Whistle-blowing, and the First-Level Manager: A Preliminary Study’ (Working paper, School of Business-Management Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P.: 1990, ‘First-Level Managers and Whistleblowing: An Exploratory Study of Individual and Organizational Influences’ (Working paper, School of Business-Management Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibler, W. L.: 1992, ‘Cheating: Institutions Need a Comprehensive Plan for Promoting Academic Integrity’,Chronicle of Higher Education, Nov. 11, B1–B2.

  • Martin, G. L. and I. M. Newman: 1982, ‘Randomized Response: A Technique For Improving the Validity of Self-Reported Health Behaviors’,Journal of School Health April, 222–226.

  • Mathews, M. C.: 1987, ‘Codes of Ethics: Organizational Behavior and Mishebavior’, in W. C. Frederick (ed.),Research in Corporate and Social Performance and Policy 9 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) pp. 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB): 1981, ‘Whistle-Blowing and the Federal Employee’ (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB): 1984, ‘Blowing the Whistle in the Federal Government: A Comparative Analysis of 1980 and 1983 Survey Findings’ (U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., J. B. Dozier and J. P. Near: 1991, ‘Blowing the Whistle on Data-Fudging: A Controlled Field Experiment’,Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21, 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1988, Individual and situational correlates of whistle-blowing’,Personnel Psychology 41, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1989, ‘The incidence of wrongdoing, whistle-blowing, and retaliation: Results of a natural occurring field experiment’,Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 2, 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1992,Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational & Legal Implications for Companies and Employees (Lexington Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., and C. R. Schwenk: 1992, ‘Who blows the whistle and why: Perceptions of victims, perpetrators, and role related variables’,Industrial Labor Relations Review 45, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J. W. and T. D. Miethe: 1989, ‘Applying Theories of Deviance to Academic Cheating’,Social Science Quarterly 70, 870–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H. and P. M. Podsakoff: 1992, ‘A Meta-Analytic Review and Empirical Test of the Potential Confounding Effects of Social Desirability Response Sets in Organizational Behaviour Research’,Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 65, 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moors, J. J. A.: 1971, ‘Optimization of the Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 627–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., M. S. Baucus and M. P. Miceli: 1993, ‘The Relationship Between Values and Practice: Organizational Climates for Wrongdoing’,Administration and Society 25, 204–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., T. M. Dworkin and M. P. Miceli: 1993, ‘Explaining the Whistle-blowing Process: Suggestions from Power Theory and Justice Theory’,Organization Science 4, 411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli: 1985, ‘Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistle-blowing’,Journal of Business Ethics 4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli: 1987, ‘Whistle-Blowers in Organizations: Dissidents or Reformers?’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior 9 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) pp. 321–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli: 1988,The Internal Auditor's Ultimate Responsibility: The Reporting of Sensitive Issues (The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, Altamonte Springs, FL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J.: 1984, ‘Methods of Coping with Social Desirability Bias: A Review’,European Journal of Social Psychology 15, 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. and N. Schaefer: 1986, ‘Cheating among College Students Estimated with the Randomized-Response Technique’,College Student Journal 20, 321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse, R. C.: 1982, ‘Alienation and Cheating Behavior in the School Environment’,Psychology in the Schools 19, 234–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuss, E. M.: 1984, ‘Academic Integrity: Comparing Faculty and Student Attitudes’,Improving College and University Teaching 32(3), 140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwin, R. G. and R. F. Boruch: 1982, ‘RRT Meets RDD: Statistical Strategies for Assuring Response in Telephone Surveys’,Public Opinion Quarterly 46, 560–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, H. H. and Y. Bek: 1976, ‘A Comparison of Three Randomized Response Models for Quantitative Data’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 71, 884–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, W. K.: 1974, ‘Estimation of the Distribution Function of a Continuous Type Random Variable Through Randomized Response’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 69, 1002–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheers, N. J. and C. M. Dayton: 1987, ‘Improved Estimation of Academic Cheating Behavior Using the Randomized Response Technique’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 26(1), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, I. M. and G. S. Bonham: 1978, ‘Randomized Response Technique in a National Survey’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 73, 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierles, F. S., B. D. Kushner and P. B. Krause: 1988, ‘A Controlled Experiment With a Medical Student Honor System’,Journal of Medical Education 63, 705–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeken, K. L.: 1987, ‘Randomized Response Methodology in Health Research’,Evaluation and Health Professions 10(1), 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeken, K. L. and S. P. Damrosch: 1986, ‘Randomized Response Technique: Applications to Research on Rape’,Psychology of Women Quarterly 10, 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeken, K. L. and G. B. Macready: 1986, ‘Application of Setwise Randomized Response Procedures for Surveying Multiple Sensitive Attributes’,Psychological Bulletin 99(2): 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeken, K. L. and D. R. Soeken: 1987, ‘A survey of whistleblowers: Their stressors and coping strategies’,Proceedings of the hearing on H.R. 25 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC), pp. 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamhane, A. C.: 1981, ‘Randomized Response Techniques for Multiple Sensitive Attributes’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 76, 916–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P.: 1987, ‘Fraud Will Out — or Will It?’,New Scientist 115, 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom, G and N. Borin: 1988, ‘Cheating in Academe’,Journal of Education for Business, Jan., 153–157.

  • Tracy, R. E. and J. A. Fox: 1981, ‘The Validity of Randomized Response for Sensitive Measurement’,American Sociological Review 46 (April): 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. L.: 1965, ‘Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 60, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. L.: 1971, ‘The Linear Randomized Response Model’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 884–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zdep, S. M. and I. N. Rhodes: 1976, ‘Making the Randomized Response Technique Work’,Public Opinion Quarterly 40, 531–537.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Graduate School of Business, Indiana University, 47405-1701, Bloomington, IN, U.S.A.

    Brian K. Burton & Janet P. Near

Authors
  1. Brian K. Burton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Janet P. Near
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Brian K. Burton is a doctoral student in strategic management as well as managing editor ofBusiness Horizons, the interdisciplinary business journal published by Indiana University. His research interests include business ethics, stakeholder analysis, corporate political activity, and nontraditional approaches to management.

Janet P. Near is Professor and Chairperson, Management Dept., and Adjunct Professor, Sociology Dept., Indiana University. Her research interests include: (a) whistle-blowing in organizations and (b) the relationship between work and non-work domains of life, focusing especially on the correlation between job satisfaction and life satisfaction. She has published several articles on these topics and, with Marcia Miceli, a book on whistle-blowing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burton, B.K., Near, J.P. Estimating the incidence of wrongdoing and whistle-blowing: Results of a study using randomized response technique. J Bus Ethics 14, 17–30 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873732

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873732

Keywords

Search

Navigation