Abstract
This paper examines the philosophical basis for the argument that there is a connection between ethical behavior and profitability. Both sides of this argument – that good ethics is good business and that bad ethics is bad business – are explored. The possibility of a moral floor above which ethical behavior is not rewarded is considered, and an economic experiment testing such a proposition is discussed. Johnson & Johnson suffers a potentially devastating blow when some cyanide-laced Tylenol capsules cause several deaths. Johnson & Johnson voluntarily pulls Tylenol off the shelf, to universal acclaim. When Tylenol is returned to the marketplace, its share of the over-the-counter painkiller market becomes greater than it was before the tragedy. Arthur Andersen, the venerable accounting firm, is caught in the web surrounding the downfall of Enron, Inc. As Enron’s various sins are discovered, it is found that Arthur Andersen auditors had signed off on flawed audits and had shredded documents to cover themselves. Andersen is prosecuted for, and convicted of, obstructing justice (although the conviction is later overturned). Today the firm barely exists and has no resemblance to the Big Five accounting giant of 1999. These stories seem to indicate that ethical (or unethical) behavior leads to positive (or negative) financial results. But the philosophical arguments underpinning such statements are seldom subjected to proper analysis. They are perhaps wishful thinking, or perhaps based on examples such as the above without considering other examples that may reinforce a contrary position. This paper will explore the philosophical arguments and empirical evidence regarding these statements and state some research questions for exploration in this area. In particular we will propose the possibility that a moral floor exists above which firms that engage in ethical activities will not reap rewards, but below which firms that engage in unethical activities will be punished by actors in the economic marketplace. We will discuss an economic experiment to determine if such actors indeed form a moral floor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D. 2005. Neuroeconomics: Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 9–64.
Carroll A.B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4: 497–505.
DeGeorge, R.T. 1995. Business ethics (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Donaldson, T., and Preston, L.E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91.
Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A., and Barnett, M.L. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105 (1): 85–106.
Fombrun, C., and Shanley, M. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233–258.
Frooman, J. 1997. Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business & Society, 36: 221–249.
Fryxell, G., and Wang, J. 1994. The Fortune corporate reputation index: Reputation for what? Journal of Management, 20: 1–14.
Griffin, J.J., and Mahon, J.F. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36: 5–31.
Harris, C.E. Jr. 1997. Applying moral theories (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Hillman, A.J., and Keim, G.D. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125–139.
Hutton, R.B., D’Antonio, L., and Johnsen, T. 1998. Socially responsible investing: Growing issues and new opportunities. Business & Society, 37: 281–305.
Kahneman, D. 2003. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93: 1449–75.
Koys, D.J. 2001. The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54: 101–114.
Lakoff, G. 1996. Moral politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Margolis, J.D., and Walsh, J.P. 2001. People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum.
Mattingly, J. E. 2004. Stakeholder salience, structural development, and firm performance: Structural and performance correlates of sociopolitical stakeholder management strategies. Business and Society, 43, 1: 97–114.
McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 603–609.
Orlitzky, M. 1998. A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa
Orlitzky, M. 2002. People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance [review]. International journal of organizational analysis, 10: 191–194.
Orlitzsky, M., Schmidt, F.L., and Rynes, S.L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24: 403–441.
Payne, L.S. 2003. Value shift: Why companies must merge social and financial imperatives to achieve superior performance. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Petrick, J.A., Scherer, R.F., Brodzinski, J.D., Quinn, J.F., and Ainina, M.F. 1999. Global leadership skills and reputational capital: Intangible resources for sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 13 (1): 58–69.
Preston, L.E., and O’Bannon, D.P. 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36: 419–429.
Roman, R.M., Hayibor, S., and Agle, B.R. 1999. The relationship between social and financial performance: Repainting a portrait. Business & Society, 38: 109–125.
Rowley, T.J., and Berman, S. 2000. A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39: 397–418.
Ruf, B.M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R.M., Janney, J.J., and Paul, K. 2001. An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32: 143–156.
Surroca, J. and J. A. Tribo: 2005. ‹The Corporate Social and Financial Performance Relationship: What’s the Ultimate Determinant’? Academy of Management Proceedings, E1–E6
Waddock, S.A., and Graves, S.B. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 303–319.
Waddock, S., and Graves, S.B. 2000. Performance characteristics of social and traditional investments. Journal of Investing, 9: 27–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burton, B.K., Goldsby, M.G. The Moral Floor: A Philosophical Examination of the Connection Between Ethics and Business. J Bus Ethics 91, 145–154 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0074-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0074-4