Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Compositionality in cognitive models: The real issue

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Butler, K. (1991) “Towards a Connectionist Cognitive Architecture.”Mind and Language 6: 252–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1989)Microcognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. (1989) “Representation and Structure in Connectionist Models.” CRL Technical Report 8903. Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. (1990) “Finding Structure in Time.”Cognitive Science 14: 179–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. and McLaughlin, B. (1991) “Connectionism and the Problem of Systematicity: Why Smolensky's Solution Doesn't Work.” In: Horgan and Tiensen (1991), pp. 331–353.

  • Fodor, J. and Pylyshyn, Z. (1988) “Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis.”Cognition 28: 3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and Tiensen, J. (1991)Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D. (1987) “Putting a Price On Cognition.”The Southern Journal of Philosophy 26(supplement): 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahav, R. (1989) “Against Compositionality: The Case of Adjectives.”Philosophical Studies 57: 261–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. and Kowamoto, A. (1986) “Mechanisms of Sentence Processing: Assigning Roles of Constituents of Sentences.” In: McClelland and Rumelhart (1986), pp. 216–271.

  • McClelland, J. and Rumelhart, D. (1986)Parallel Distributed Processing: Exploration in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1975) “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104: 192–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. and McClelland, J. (1986)Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P. (1987) “The Constituent Structure of Connectionism Mental States: A Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn.”The Southern Journal of Philosophy (supplement): 137–161.

  • Smolensky, P. (1988) “On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11: 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, T. (1990) “Compositionality: A Connectionist Variation on a Classical Theme.”Cognitive Science 14: 355–384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Washington University, 63130, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Keith Butler

Authors
  1. Keith Butler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butler, K. Compositionality in cognitive models: The real issue. Philos Stud 78, 125–151 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989678

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989678

Keywords

Search

Navigation