Skip to main content
Log in

The Planned Obsolescence of the Humanities: Is It Unethical?

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The humanities have not enjoyed preeminence in academe since the Scientific Revolution marginalized the old trivium. But they long continued to play a subordinate educational role by helping constitute the distinguishing culture of the elite. Now even this subordinate role is becoming expendable as devotees of the profit motive seek to reduce culture to technological delivery of cultural products (Noble, Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education, New York: Monthly Review Press, 2003). The result is a deliberate downsizing of the humanities as traditionally understood. Personal preferences aside, is this planned obsolescence morally defensible? Arguably not, if one appeals to traditional ethical norms. But what if its legitimacy is assessed instead according to the quite different norms of capitalism that figure so prominently in university administrators’ rationales as they embrace corporatization? The corporatization of American universities has had multiple effects, and some of these have not been entirely positive. In particular, it has had an adverse effect on the professional status and values of faculty. But how faculty respond to these changes varies according to their institutional situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data cited here is contained in “Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis In A Nutshell,” which is a part of Critical Comparisons of American Colleges and Universities, created by The Urban Universities Portfolio Project, available online at http://www.imir.iupui.edu/portfolio/campus/IUPUI-cc.htm.

References

  • Acton, H. B. (1972). The ethics of capitalism. London: Foundation for Business Responsibilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehning, C. H., & Miller, M. T. (1997). Research in the sabbatical leave: A review (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. 414 777).

  • Brand, M. (2002). ‘President Brand’s letter’ to “colleagues” of Indiana University (June 27), posted online at http://www.bursar.iupui.edu/new_fall_2003_fee_for_iupui.htm.

  • Broudy, H. S. (1958). Science “versus” the humanities in the school curriculum. Journal of Philosophy, 55(23), 987–997 (Nov. 6).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. (1985). Ethics, efficiency, and the market. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. (1990). Work, Inc.: A philosophical inquiry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. (1997). Public power, private interests: Where do we fit in? Bloomington, IN: 1stBooks Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. (2006). Leave no oil reserves behind, including Iraq’s: The geopolitics of American imperialism. In T. Smith & H. Van der Linden (Eds.), Philosophy against empire (pp. 39–54). Charlottesville. VA: Philosophy Documentation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. (2007). Assessing the arms industry’s corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, F. (2001). Symposium participants take clear-eyed look at humanities in academe, posted online at http://www.news.cornell.edu/chronicle/01/4.12.01/humanities.html.

  • Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glater, J. D. (2007). Certain degrees now cost more at universities. New York Times (July 29).

  • Gleason, P. (1995). Contending with modernity: Catholic higher education in the twentieth century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. (2006). Choosing children: Genes, disability, and design. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattwick, R. E. (2000-2001). The ethics of capitalism. Journal of Business Leadership, 11, 91–114 (Fall), posted at http://www.anbhf.org/pdf/hattwick.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. M. (Ed.) (1984). The philosophy of economics: An anthology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Held, V. (1984). Rights and goods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersey, J. (1980). The triumph of numbers. Atlantic Monthly, 246, 78–84 (Oct.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeller, K. (2006). The proper advocates for adjuncts. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52, 41, posted at http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i41/41b01101.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, P. A. (2000). A professional professoriate: Unionization, bureaucratization, and the AAUP. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1907). The social value of the college-bred. Address delivered at a meeting of American Alumnae at Radcliff College, Nov. 7.

  • Johnson, B., Kavanagh, P., & Mattsen K. (2003). Steal this university: The rise of the corporate university and the academic labor movement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, G. R. (1923). The ethics of capitalism. New York: Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, B., & Miller, M.T. (1999). An overview of the sabbatical leave in higher education: A synopsis of the literature base. ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED 430 471.

  • Koslowski, P. (1996). Ethics of capitalism and critique of sociobiology, with a comment by James M. Buchanan. New York: Springer.

  • Lively, K. (1993). Sabbaticals under fire. Chronicle of Higher Education, 40(25), A16–A17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, C. (1977). Forces which influence ethical behavior. In C. Walton (Ed.), The ethics of corporate conduct (pp. 31–78). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, J. E. (1958). Why should the humanities be taught? Journal of Philosophy, 55(23), 997–1008 (Nov. 6).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. (2003). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, T. (2005). Selling college literacy: The mass-market magazine as early 20th century literacy sponsor. American Periodicals, 15(2), 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., & Rose, H. (1973). Can science be neutral? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, pp. 605–624 (Summer).

  • Saunders, J. (1999). A human rights lawyer’s appeal to academics. Academe, Jan., posted online at http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/1999/99ja/JA99FTR3.HTM.

  • Sima, C. (2000). The role and benefits of the sabbatical leave in faculty development and satisfaction. New Directions for Institutional Research, 27(1), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sima, C., & Denton, W. E. (1995). The reasons for and products of faculty sabbatical leaves. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper; ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED 391 420.

  • Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P. (1963). The two cultures and a second look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. D. (1991). Where the law ends: The social control of corporate behavior. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press (orig. 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, R. H. (1947). Religion and the rise of capitalism. New York: Transaction Publishers (orig. 1926).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, tr. Talcott Parsons. London: Allen & Unwin; orig. 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, A. (2005). The brains business: A survey of higher education. The Economist (Sept. 10).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmund Byrne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byrne, E. The Planned Obsolescence of the Humanities: Is It Unethical?. J Acad Ethics 5, 141–152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-007-9036-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-007-9036-6

Keywords

Navigation