Abstract
In Unifying Biology, Smocovitis offers a series of claimsregarding the relationship between key actors in the synthesisperiod of evolutionary studies and “positivism,” especially claimsentailing Joseph Henry Woodger and the Unity of Science Movement.This commentary examines Woodger's possible relevance to key synthesis actors and challenges Smocovitis' arguments for theexplanatory relevance of logical positivism, and positivism moregenerally, to synthesis history. Under scrutiny, these arguments areshort on evidence and subject to substantial conceptual confusion.Though plausible, Smocovitis' minimal interpretation – that somegeneralised form of Comtean positivism had a role in synthesishistory – requires more of an evidential basis and must engageexisting scholarship on epistemic reforms in the biological sciencesprior to the synthesis period. Smocovitis is right to investigateepistemology in the synthesis period of evolutionary studies and tolook for links to wider changes in science and philosophy. However,in its present form, Unifying Biology fails to support herbasic interpretation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Abir-Am, P.: 1987a, ‘The Bio-Theoretical Gathering, Transdisciplinary Authority and the Incipient Legitimation of Molecular Biology in the 1930s: New Perspectives on the Historical Sociology of Science’, History of Science 25, 1–70.
Abir-Am, P.: 1987b, ‘Synergy or Clash: Disciplinary and Marital Strategies in the Career of Mathematical Biologist Dorothy Wrinch’, in P. Abir-Am and D. Outram (eds), Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives: Woman and Science, 1789–1979, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 239–280, 342–354.
Allen, G.: 1975, Life Sciences in the Twentieth Century, Wiley, New York.
Ayer, A.J. (ed.): 1978 [1959], Logical Positivism, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
Beckner, M.O.: 1967, ‘Biology’, in P. Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan, New York, pp. 310–318.
Bowler, P.: 1983, Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Cain, J.: 1993, ‘Common Problems and Cooperative Solutions: Organizational Activities in Evolutionary Studies, 1937–1946’, Isis 84, 1–25.
Cain, J.: 1994, ‘Ernst Mayr as Community Architect: Launching the Society for the Study of Evolution and the Journal Evolution’, Biology and Philosophy 9, 387–427.
Chetverikov, S.S.: 1961 [1926], ‘On Certain Aspects of the Evolutionary Processes from the Standpoint of Modern Genetics’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 105, 167–195, (translated by Malina Barker, editor I. Michael Lerner).
Cittadino, E.: 1990, Nature as the Laboratory: Darwinian Plant Ecology in the German Empire, 1880–1900, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Fisher, R.: 1930, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Floyd, W.F. and Harris, F.T.C.: 1964, ‘Joseph Henry Woodger, Curriculum Vitae’, in J. Gregg and F.T.C. Harris (eds), Form and Strategy in Science: Studies Dedicated to Joseph Henry Woodger on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–6.
Galison, P.: 1998, ‘The Americanization of Unity’, Daedalus 127, 45–71.
Galison, P. and Stump, D.J.: 1996, The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Giere, R. and Richardson, A. (eds): 1996, Origins of Logical Empiricism, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 16).
Gower, B. (ed.): 1987, Logical Positivism in Perspective: Essays on Language, Truth and Logic, Croom Helm, London.
Gregg, J. and Harris, F.T.C. (eds): 1964, Form and Strategy in Science: Studies Dedicated to Joseph Henry Woodger on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Gulick, J.T.: 1905, Evolution, Racial and Habitudinal, Controlled by Segregation, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.
Haldane, J.S.: 1931, The Philosophical Basis of Biology (Donnellan Lectures, University of Dublin, 1930), Hodder and Stoughton, London.
Haldane, J.B.S.: 1924, ‘A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 23, 19–41.
Hanfling, O. (ed.): 1981, Essential Readings in Logical Positivism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Harwood, J.: 1994, Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community, 1900– 1933, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hull, D.: 1969, ‘What the Philosophy of Biology is Not’, Journal of the History of Biology 2, 241–268.
Kingsland, S.: 1991, ‘The Battling Botanist: Daniel Trembly MacDougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology’, Isis 82, 479–509.
Kinsey, A.: 1937, Methods in Biology, Lippencott, Philadelphia.
Laporte, L.: 1994, ‘Simpson on Species’, Journal of the History of Biology 27, 141–159.
Lesch, J.: 1975, ‘The Role of Isolation in Evolution: George J. Romanes and John T. Gulick’, Isis 66, 483–503.
Maienschein, J.: 1991, Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Pauly, P.: 1987, Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology, Oxford University Press, New York.
Pauly, P.: 1991, ‘The Development of High School Biology: New York City, 1900–1925’, Isis 82, 662–688.
Provine, W.: 1971, The Origin of Mathematical Population Genetics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Provine, W.: 1986, Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Rainger, R., Benson, K. and Maienschein, J. (eds): 1988, The American Development of Biology, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Roll-Hansen, N.: 1984, ‘E.S. Russell and J.H. Woodger: The Failure of Two Twentieth-Century Opponents of Mechanistic Biology’, Journal of the History of Biology 17, 399–428.
Ruse, M.: 1996, Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Simpson, G. and Roe, A.: 1939, Quantitative Zoology, Macmillan, New York.
Smocovitis, V.B.: 1992, ‘Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology’, Journal of the History of Biology 25, 1–65.
Smocovitis, V.B.: 1996, Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Suppe, F. (ed.): 1977, The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd edn., University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Thomson, J.A. and Geddes, P.: 1931, Life: Outlines of General Biology, 2 vols.,Williams and Norgate, London.
Woodger, J.H.: 1929, Biological Principles: A Critical Study, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., London.
Woodger, J.H.: 1931a, ‘The Relation Between Descriptive and Experimental Embryology’, Science Progress 26, 306–324.
Woodger, J.H.: 1931b, ‘The ‘Concept of Organism’ and the Relation between Embryology and Genetics’, Quarterly Review of Biology 5, 1–22, 438–463.
Woodger, J.H.: 1932, ‘The ‘Concept of Organism’ and the Relation between Embryology and Genetics’, Quarterly Review of Biology 6, 178–207.
Woodger, J.H.: 1937, The Axiomatic Method in Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Woodger, J.H.: 1939, ‘The Technique of Theory Construction’, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 11(5).
Woodger, J.H.: 1952a, Biology and Language: An Introduction to the Methodology of the Biological Sciences Including Medicine, The Tarner Lectures for 1949–1950, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Woodger, J.H.: 1952b, ‘From Biology to Mathematics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2, 193–216.
Wright, S.: 1931, ‘Evolution in Mendelian Populations’, Genetics 16, 97–159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cain, J. Woodger, Positivism, and the Evolutionary Synthesis. Biology & Philosophy 15, 535–551 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006713702749
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006713702749