Abstract
This essay attempts to specify just what one would need to show in order to draw any substantive conclusion about religion’s consequential value. It is focused on three central questions: (1) What exactly is being evaluated? (2) What benefits and harms are relevant? (3) How are the relevant benefits and harms to be assessed? Each of these questions gives rise to a range of thorny philosophical and empirical issues, and any thesis about religion’s ultimate consequential value will therefore be contingent on a range of rationally contestable assumptions and stipulations. Consequently, one should not take it as “obvious” that religion is a harmful social force, or that the world would be better off without it. Such claims require much more empirical research and philosophical reflection than they have received thus far. Thus, while we can point to a few clear cases of religiously-produced harm and benefit, we do not yet know what religion’s ultimate consequential value is, as counter-intuitive as that may seem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barro R.J., McCleary R.M. (2003) Religion and economic growth across countries. American Sociological Review 68(5): 760–781
Bowker J. (2005) The sacred neuron: Extraordinary new discoveries linking science and religion. I. B. Tauris & Co, London
Cavanaugh W. T. (2009) The myth of religious violence: Secular ideology and the roots of modern conflict. Oxford University Press, New York
Chappell T. (2001) The implications of incommensurability. Philosophy 76(295): 137–148
Corlett J. A. (2009) Dawkins’ godless delusion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65(3): 125–138
Crane, T. (2008). Should atheists be against religion? Think, 109–119.
Dawkins R. (2008) The God delusion. Houghton Mifflin, Boston and New York
Dennett D. (2006) Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. Viking Press, New York
D’Souza D. (2007) What’s so great about Christianity?. Regnery Publishing, Washington, DC
Gray, J. (2008). The atheist delusion. The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk.
Gray, J. (2010). Philosophy for the All-Too-Common Man. The National Interest Online, May/June (107), 76–82.
Grayling A. C. (2009) To set prometheus free: Essays on religion, reason and humanity. Oberon Books, London
Harris S. (2006) Letter to a Christian nation. Alfred A. Knopf, New York
Hsieh, N. (2007). Incommensurable values. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, July 2007 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/value-incommensurable/.
Kapitan T. (2009) Evaluating religion. In: Kvanvig J. L. (eds) Oxford studies in philosophy of religion. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kimball C. (2002) When religion becomes evil. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco, CA
Mochon D., Norton M. I., Ariely D. (2011) Who benefits from religion?. Social Indicators Research, 101(1): 1–15
Myers D. G. (2008) Religion and human flourishing. In: Eid M., Larsen R. J. (eds) The science of subjective well-being. The Guilford Press, New York and London
Nagel, T. (2010). Dawkins and atheism. In Secular philosophy and the religious temperament: Essays 2002–2008. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Norris P., Inglehart R. (2004) Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pargament K. I. (2002) The bitter and the sweet: An evaluation of the costs and benefits of religiousness. Psychological Inquiry 13(3): 168–181
Paul, G. S. (2005). Cross-national correlations of quantifiable societal health with popular religiosity and secularism in the prosperous democracies: A first look. Journal of Religion and Society, 77, http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html.
Plantinga, A. (2007). The Dawkins confusion. Books & Culture, March/April, 21–24.
Putnam R. D., Campbell D. E. (2010) American grace: How religion unites and divides us. Simon & Schuster, Inc, New York
Quinn P. L. (2005) Religious diversity: Familiar problems, novel opportunities. In: Wainwright W. J. (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of religion. Oxford University Press, New York
Russell, B. (1957). Has religion made useful contributions to civilization? In Why I am not a Christian and other essays on religion and related subjects. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Sen A. (2000) Consequential evaluation and practical reason. The Journal of Philosophy 97(9): 477–502
Stocker M. (1990) Plural and conflicting values. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Stump E. (2010) Wandering in darkness: Narrative and the problem of suffering. Oxford University Press, New York
Ward K. (2007) Is religion dangerous?. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI
Zuckerman P. (2008) Society without God: What the least religious nations can tell us about contentment. New York University Press, New York and London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Callaway, C.A. Keeping score: the consequential critique of religion. Int J Philos Relig 70, 231–246 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9311-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9311-8