Skip to main content
Log in

Constructivism and the Limits of Reason: Revisiting the Kantian Problematic

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main focus of this paper ison ways in which Kantian philosophy can informproponents and opponents of constructivismalike. Kant was primarily concerned withreconciling natural and moral law. His approachto this general problematic was to limit andseparate what we can know about things(phenomena) from things as they are inthemselves (noumena), and to identify moralagency with the latter. Revisiting the Kantianproblematic helps to address and resolve longstanding epistemological concerns regardingconstructivism as an educational philosophy inrelation to issues of objectivity andsubjectivity, the limits of theoretical andpractical reason, and the relation betweenhuman experience and the world. It also servesto address ethical concerns regardingliberation from limited self-interests andcontexts conditioned by localised beliefs andinclinations. In light of revisiting theKantian problematic, both Glasersfeld's radicalview of constructivism and Jardine's socialcritique of constructivism are found wanting.Beyond constructivism, Kant's distinctionbetween phenomena and noumena and the limits ofreason that follow from it are brieflyconsidered in terms of Merleau-Ponty's noveldouble-embodied notion of flesh as anontological primitive – as a matter of beingboth in, and of, the world – with an aim tomore intimate connections between epistemologyand ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Appelbaum, D. (1995). The vision of Kant. Rockport, MA: The Spirit of Philosophy Series, Element Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviram, A. (2000). Beyond constructivism: Autonomy-oriented education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 19(5/6), 465–489 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, A. (1994). Kant and the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S.R. (1998). Preservice teachers' understanding of elementary number theory: Qualitative constructivist research situated within a Kantian framework for under-standing educational inquiry. Doctoral Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S.R. (2001). Enacting possible worlds: Making sense of (human) nature. In J.P. Matos, W. Blum, K. Houston and S.P. Carreira (Eds), Modelling and mathematics education, ICTMA 9: Applications in science and technology (pp. 3–14). London: Horwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1972) Piaget's theory of child development. Orbit, 3(4), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffa, A. and Wessels, L. (1991). The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna station. New York NY: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1966/1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius, W.V. (1983). Piaget's theory of knowledge: Its philosophical context. Human Development, 26(6), 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermacher, G. et al. (1987). Symposium on practical knowledge and teacher education. Educational Theory, 37(4), 357–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. (2000). Afterword. Educational Theory, 50(2), 275–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (1998). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. In M.R. Matthews (Ed.), Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination (pp. 11–30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K.R. and Berv, J. (2000). Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. In D.C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 19–40). Chicago IL: The National Society for the Study of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, D.W. (1992). Immanuel Kant, Jean Piaget and the rage for order: Ecological hints of the colonial spirit in pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 24(1), 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, K. (1957/1962). Kant. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1952/1790). Critique of judgement. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1953/1783). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to present itself as a science. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1964/1785). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1965/1787). Critique of pure reason. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1996/1797). The netaphysics of morals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1997/1788). Critique of practical reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessels, J.P.A.M. and Korthagen, F.A.J. (1996). The relationship between theory and practice: Back to the classics. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J. (1987). What constructivism might be in mathematics education. In J.C. Bergeron, N. Herscovics and C. Kieran (Eds), The proceedings of the eleventh international conference of the psychology of mathematics education (vol. 1, pp. 3–27). Montréal Canada: Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1990). Kant's transcendental psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. Journal of Philosophy, 70(8), 630–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kröner, S. (Ed.) (1974). Practical reason. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W.E. (1995). Mysticism. In R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of philosophy (pp. 515–516). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. (1992). Old wine in new bottles: A problem with constructivist epistemology. Philosophy of education. Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society, available on-line: www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/92_docs/Matthews.HTM

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. (2000). Appraising constructivism in science and mathematics education. In D.C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 161–192). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (2000). Kant trouble: The obscurities of the enlightened. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2000/1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. In R.F. Reed and T.W. Johnson (Eds), Philosophical documents in education (pp. 247–257). New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. (1997). Rationality and human dignity-Confucius, Kant and Scheffler on the ultimate aim of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 16(1/2), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (Ed.) (1980). Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1967). Husserl: An analysis of his phenomenology. Evanston, IL: North-western University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J.L. and Hinton, G.E. (1987). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart and P.R. Group (Eds), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (vol. 2, pp. 7–57). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellings, A. (1998). A virtue approach instead of a Kantian approach as a solution to major dilemmas in meta-ethics? A criticism of David Carr. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 17(1), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, G.J. (1985/1964). Kant. In D.J. O'Conner (Ed.), A critical history of Western philosophy. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, S.R. Constructivism and the Limits of Reason: Revisiting the Kantian Problematic. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21, 421–445 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020844323677

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020844323677

Navigation