Abstract
We attempt a conclusive resolution of the debate over whether the principle of natural selection (PNS), especially conceived as the `principle' of the `survival of the fittest', is a tautology. This debate has been largely ignored for the past 15 years but not, we think, because it has actually been settled. We begin by describing the tautology objection, and situating the problem in the philosophical and biology literature. We then demonstrate the inadequacy of six prima facie plausible reasons for believing that the tautology debate has been satisfactorily resolved (the PNS is strictly a methodological principle; scientific theories can contain tautologies; the scope of the PNS has been reduced; theories should be understood as models and not exceptionless laws; the widespread acceptance of the propensity interpretation of fitness; and the abandonment of operationalism and verificationism). We proceed to a detailed discussion of Brandon's law (D) describing the PNS, and show that law (D) seriously misrepresents the structure of evolution by natural selection. In the final sections, we provide and defend a novel reinterpretation of the structure of the principle (or, we prefer, model) of evolution by natural selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Antonovics A.D. Bradshaw R.C. Turner (1971) ArticleTitleHeavy metal tolerance in plants Adv. Ecol. Res. 7 1–85
W.J. Bock G. Wahlert Particlevon (1965) ArticleTitleAdaptation and the form-function complex Evolution 19 269–299
R.N. Brandon (1978) ArticleTitleAdaptation and evolutionary theory Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 9 181–206
Brandon R.N. 1980. (1996) A Structural Description of Evolutionary Theory. PSA 1980, vol. II (1981), pp. 427–439. As reprinted in Brandon R.N. 1996. Concepts and Methods in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 46–57.
R.B. Brandon (1990) Adaptation and Environment Princeton University Press Princeton
A.J. Cain P.M. Sheppard (1950) ArticleTitleSelection in the polymorphic land Snail Cepaea nemoralis Heredity 4 275–294
A.J. Cain P.M. Sheppard (1954) ArticleTitleNatural selection in Cepaea Genetics 39 89–116
C. Darwin (1859/1968) The origin of Species Penguin Classics New York, NY
R. Dawkins (1983) Universal Darwinism D.S. Bendall (Eds) Evolution from Molecules to Man Cambridge University Press Cambridge 403–425
R. Dawkins (1986) The Blind Watchmaker Norton New York
R. Dawkins (1996) Climbing Mount Improbable Norton New York
K.T. Gallagher (1989) ArticleTitle‘Natural Selection’: a Tautology? Int. Philos. Quart. 29 17–31
S.J. Gould (1977) Ever Since Darwin W.W. Norton New York
S.J. Gould R.C. Lewontin (1979) ArticleTitleThe spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme P. Roy. So. Lond. B 205 581–589
P.R. Grant (1986) Ecology and Evolution of Darwin’s Finches Princeton University Press Princeton
J. Hooper (2002) Of Moths and Men: IntrigueTragedy, and the Peppered Moth Fourth Estate London
D.L. Hull (1999) ArticleTitleThe use and abuse of Sir Karl Popper Biol. Philos. 14 481–504 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006554919188
P. Johnson (1991) Darwin on Trial Regnery Washington, DC
P. Kitcher (1982) Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism MIT Press Cambridge MA
C.B. Krimbas (2004) ArticleTitleOn fitness Bio. Philos. 19 185–203
E.A. Lloyd (1988) The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory Greenwood Press Westport CT
M. Majerus (1998) Melanism: Evolution in Action Oxford University Press New York
M. Matthen A. Ariew (2002) ArticleTitleTwo ways of thinking about fitness and natural selection J. Philos. 99 55–83
K.R. Popper (1963) Conjectures and Refutations Harper New York
K.R. Popper (1972) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach Clarendon Press Oxford
K.R. Popper (1974) Darwinism as a metaphysical research programme P.A. Schilpp (Eds) The Philosophy of Sir Karl Popper Open Court Lasalle IL 133–143
K.R. Popper (1977) Natural selection and its scientific status M. David (Eds) Popper Selections Princeton University Press, 1985 Princeton 239–246
R.A. Raff (2001) ArticleTitleThe Creationist Abuse of Evo-Devo Evol. Dev. 3 373–374 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1525-142X.2001.01044.x
A. Rosenberg (1983) ArticleTitleFitness J. Philos. 80 457–473
M. Ruse (1982) Darwinism Defended Addison-Wesley London
E. Sober (1984) The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus Bradford/MIT Press Cambridge
E. Sober (1993) Philosophy of Biology Westview Press Boulder
E. Sober (1998) Six sayings about adaptationism H. David R. Michael (Eds) The Philosophy of Biology Oxford University Press New York 72–86
D. Stove (1996) Darwinian Fairytales Avebury/Ashgate Burlington, VT
C.K. Waters (1986) ArticleTitleNatural selection without survival of the fittest Biol. Philos. 1 207–225
J. Wells (2000) Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution is Wrong Regnery Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, R., Robert, J. The Structure of Evolution by Natural Selection. Biol Philos 20, 673–696 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-004-2439-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-004-2439-5