Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consequentialism, Alternatives, and Actualism

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Bergström, L. (1966): The Alternatives and Consequences of Actions, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, L. (1976): ‘On the Formulation and Application of Utilitarianism’, Noûs 10, 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, L. (1977): ‘Utilitarianism and Future Mistakes’, Theoria 43, 84–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, E. (1995): Consequentialism Reconsidered, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, H-N. (1968): ‘A Problem for Utilitarianism’, Analysis 28, 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, F. (1986): Doing the Best We Can, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, H.S. (1976): ‘Dated Rightness and Moral Imperfection’, The Philosophical Review 85, 449–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, H.S. (1978): ‘Doing the Best One Can’, in A.I. Goldman and J. Kim (eds.), Values and Morals, pp. 185–214, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, P.S. (1978): ‘Oughts and Determinism: A Response to Goldman’, The Philosophical Review 87, 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humberstone, I.L. (1983): ‘The Background of Circumstances’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. and Pargetter, R. (1986): ‘Oughts, Options, and Actualism’, The Philosophical Review 95, 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.E. (1912): Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984): Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, J.H. (1976): ‘Utilitarianism and Past and Future Mistakes’, Noûs 10, 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, J.H. (1982): ‘Utilitarian Principles for Imperfect Agents’, Theoria 48, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R.H. (1981): ‘Deontic Logic and the Role of Freedom in Moral Deliberation’, in R. Hilpinen (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic, pp. 177–186, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M.J. (1996): The Concept of Moral Obligation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Drottninggatan 4, S-753 10, Uppsala, Sweden

    Erik Carlson

Authors
  1. Erik Carlson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, E. Consequentialism, Alternatives, and Actualism. Philosophical Studies 96, 253–268 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004239306956

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004239306956

Search

Navigation