Skip to main content
Log in

Group Cancellation and Resolution

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We establish a connection between the geometric methods developed in the combinatorial theory of small cancellation and the propositional resolution calculus. We define a precise correspondence between resolution proofs in logic and diagrams in small cancellation theory, and as a consequence, we derive that a resolution proof is a 2-dimensional process. The isoperimetric function defined on diagrams corresponds to the length of resolution proofs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Jeannine J. M. Gabriëls, Stephen M. Gagola III & Mirko Navara

References

  1. Blake, A., Canonical Expressions in Boolean Algebra, PhD thesis, University of Chicago, 1937.

  2. Buss, S. R., and G. Turan, ‘Resolution proofs of generalized pigeon-hole principles’, Theoretical Computer Science, 62: 311–317, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carbone, A., ‘Streams and strings of formal proofs’, Theoretical Computer Science. To appear.

  4. Carbone, A., and S. Semmes, A Graphic Apology for Symmetry and Implicitness. Mathematical Monographs, Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Colmerauer, A., H. KANOUI, P. Roussel, and R. Pasero, Un système de communication homme-machine en français, Groupe de Recherche en Intelligence Artiflcielle, Université d'Aix-Marseille, 1973.

  6. Davis, M., and H. Putnam, ‘A computing procedure for quantification theory’, Journal of ACM, 7: 201–215, 1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein, D.B.A, J.W.Cannon, D.F.Holt, S.V.F. Levy, M.S.Paterson, and W.P.Thurston, Word Processing in Groups. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston and London, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilmore, P.C., ‘A proof method for quantification theory’, IBM Journal Res. Develop., 4: 28–35, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guba, V., and M. Sapir, Diagram Groups, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, number 620, volume 130, 1996.

  10. Haken, A., ‘The intractability of resolution’, Theoretical Computer Science, 39: 297–308, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Herbrand, J., Logical Writings, W.D. Goldfarb (ed.), Harvard University Press, 1971.

  12. Van Kampen, E.R., ‘On some lemmas in the theory of groups’, American Journal of Mathematics, 55: 268–273, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kowalski, R.A., ‘Predicate logic as a programming language’, IFIP 74, 569–574, 1974.

  14. Krajicek, J., Bounded Arithmetic, Propositional Logic, and Complexity Theory. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 60, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krajicek, J., ‘Dehn functions and length of proofs’, Internatinal Journal of Algebra and Computation, 13: 527–542, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leitsch, A., The Resolution Calculus. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science, Springer, 1997.

  17. Lyndon, R.C., ‘On Dehn's algorithm’, Math. Annalen, 166: 208–228, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyndon, R.C., and P.E. Schupp, Combinatorial Group Theory. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und iher Grenzgebiete 89, A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, Springer- Verlag, 1977.

  19. Prawitz, D., ‘An improved proof procedure’, Theoria, 26: 102–139, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson, J.A., ‘A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle’, Journal of ACM, 1: 23–41, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strebel, R., ‘Small cancellation groups’, in Sur les groupes hyperbolique d'apres Mikhael Gromov, E. Ghys and P. de la Harpe (eds.), Progress in Mathematics, volume 83, Birkhauser, Boston, 1990.

  22. Tseitin, G.S., ‘Complexity of a derivation in the Propositional calculus’, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad Otd. Mat. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 8: 234–259, 1968. Also appeared in Studies in Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, Part II, A.O. Slissenko, (ed.,) 115–125.

  23. Urquhart, A., ‘Hard examples for resolution’, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 34(1):209–219, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weinbaum, C.M., ‘Visualizing the word problem with an application to sixth group’, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 16: 557–578, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Carbone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carbone, A. Group Cancellation and Resolution. Stud Logica 82, 73–93 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-006-6606-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-006-6606-3

Keywords

Navigation