Skip to main content

On a Theoretical Analysis of Deceiving: How to Resist a Bullshit Attack

  • Chapter
Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 314))

Abstract

This paper intends to open a discussion on how certain dangerous kinds of deceptive reasoning can be defined, in which way it is achieved in a discussion, and which would be the strategies for defense against such deceptive attacks on the light of some principles accepted as fundamental for rationality and logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Augustine: Contra Mendacium (Against Lying), 422. Ed. J-P. Migne. Patrologia Latina vol. 40. Paris (1887), English translation at, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1313.htm

  2. Bacon, F.: The New Organon or True Directions Concerning The Interpretation of Nature (1620), http://www.constitution.org/bacon/nov_org.htm , Rendition based on James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, and Douglas Denon Heath in The Works (Vol. VIII), published by Taggard and Thompson, Boston (1863)

  3. Blackburn, S.: Charity, principle of. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brandstätter, E., Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R.: The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review 113(2), 409–432 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carnielli, W.A., Coniglio, M.E., Gabbay, D., Gouveia, P., Sernadas, C.: Analysis and Synthesis of Logics – How to Cut and Paste Reasoning Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Carnielli, W.A., Coniglio, M.E.: Bridge principles and combined reasoning. In: Müller, T., Newen, A. (eds.) Logik, Begriffe, Prinzipien des Handelns (Logic, Concepts, Principles of Action), pp. 32–48. Mentis Verlag, Paderborn (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carnielli, W.A., Pizzi, C.: Modalities and Multimodalities. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson, D.: Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davidson, D.: Problems of Rationality. Clarendon Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. da Fonseca, E.G.: Lies We Live by: The Art of Self-Deception. Bloomsbury (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Epstein, R.L.: Five Ways of Saying “Therefore”: Arguments, Proofs, Conditionals, Cause and Effect, Explanations. Wadsworth Pub. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Floridi, L.: Logical fallacies as informational shortcuts. Synthese 167(2), 317–325 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Frankfurt, H.G.: On Bullshit. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J.: Fallacies as cognitive virtues. In: Majer, O., Pietarinen, A.-V., Tulenheimo, T. (eds.) Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Series Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol. 15, pp. 56–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Grice, P.: Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Harvard (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hamblin, C.L.: Fallacies. Methuen (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harford, T.: The Logic of Life: The Rational Economics of an Irrational World. Random House, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., Stone, A.: Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science 312(5782), 1908–1910 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahon, J.E.: The Definition of Lying and Deception First. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.science.uva.nl/seop/entries/lying-definition/ (Published February 21, 2008)

  20. Malpas, J.: Donald Davidson. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/davidson/DonaldDavidson (Published May 23, 2005)

  21. Otto, M.: Bounded variable logics and counting. In: A study in finite models. Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 9. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pears, D.: Self-deceptive belief-formation. Synthese 89, 393–405 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scriven, M.: Reasoning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Extension versus intuititve reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review 90, 293–315 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carnielli, W. (2010). On a Theoretical Analysis of Deceiving: How to Resist a Bullshit Attack. In: Magnani, L., Carnielli, W., Pizzi, C. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 314. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15222-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15223-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics