Abstract
The heavy application pressure under which science operates, its increased dependency on technical apparatus for experimentation, visualization, and modelling, and its technological ambitions to manage the complexities of highly developed societies have prompted claims to the effect that science as such has undergone a profound methodological and institutional transformation during the past decades. Application-oriented research is not the same as “applied science” in that it does not consist in the transfer of basic knowledge to practical challenges. Instead, application-oriented research emphasizes intervention to the point that theoretical representation may be receding into the background. Shaping the world, rather than understanding it, appears to be the chief objective of contemporary science. The contributions to the volume attempt to identify, explore and assess the changing conditions of scientific research. The three central questions asked are: Does science proceed differently, and if so, how? Does science affect society differently, and if so, how? Is science conceived differently, and if so, how?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carrier, M. 2004. Knowledge gain and practical use: Models in pure and applied research. In Laws and Models in Science, ed. D. Gillies, 1–17. London: King’s College Publications.
Carrier, M. 2008. Science in the grip of the economy: On the epistemic impact of the commercialization of research. In The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited, eds. M. Carrier, D. Howard, and J. Kourany, 217–234. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Concar, D. 2002. Corporate science v the right to know. New Scientist, March 16, 2002.
Gibbons, M., et al. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Sciences. London: Sage.
Gibson, E., F. Baylis, and S. Lewis. 2002. Dances with the pharmaceutical industry. Canadian Medical Association Journal 166:448–452.
Humphreys, P. 2004. Extending Ourselves. Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kitcher, P. 2004. On the autonomy of the sciences. Philosophy Today 48 (Supplement):51–57.
Koertge, N. 2000. Science, values, and the value of science. Philosophy of Science 67 (Proceedings):S45–S57.
Koertge, N. 2003. Feminist values and the value of science. In Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology. An Examination of Gender in Science, eds. C.L. Pinnick, N. Koertge, and R.F. Almeder, 222–233. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Lenhard, J. 2006. Surprised by a Nanowire: Simulation, control, and understanding. Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 73:S605–S616.
Lenhard, J. 2007. Computer simulation: The cooperation between experimenting and modeling. Philosophy of Science 74:176–194.
Merton, R.K. 1942 [1973]. The normative structure of science. In The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, eds. R.K. Merton, 267–278. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Nordmann, A. 2006. Collapse of distance: Epistemic strategies of science and technoscience. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 41:7–34.
Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
Polanyi, M. 1962. Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Stokes, D.E. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant. Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Winsberg, E. 2003. Simulated experiments: Methodology for a virtual world. Philosophy of Science 70:105–125.
Wray, K.B. 2002. The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science 69:150–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carrier, M., Nordmann, A. (2011). Science in the Context of Application: Methodological Change, Conceptual Transformation, Cultural Reorientation. In: Carrier, M., Nordmann, A. (eds) Science in the Context of Application. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 274. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9050-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9051-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)