Skip to main content
Log in

Scientific visualisations and aesthetic grounds for trust

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The collaborative ‹Big Science’ approach prevalent in physics during the mid- and late-20th century is becoming more common in the life sciences. Often computationally mediated, these collaborations challenge researchers’ trust practices. Focusing on the visualisations that are often at the heart of this form of scientific practice, the paper proposes that the aesthetic aspects of these visualisations are themselves a way of securing trust. Kant’s account of aesthetic judgements in the Third Critique is drawn upon in order to show that the image-building capability of imagination, and the sensus communis, both of which are integral parts of aesthetic experience, play an important role in building and sustaining community in these forms of science. Kant’s theory shows that the aesthetic appeal of scientific visualisations is not isolated from two other dimensions of the visualisations: the cognitive-epistemic, aesthetic-stylistic and interpersonal dimensions, and that in virtue of these inter-relationships, visualisations contribute to building up the intersubjectively shared framework of agreement which is basic for trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araya A. The Hidden Side of Visualization. Techné, 7(2): 27–93, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Arendt. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. R. Beiner, editor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992

  • Baier A. Trust and Anti-Trust. Ethics, 96: 231–260, 1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coady C.A.J. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker E. Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony. Mind, 104: 393–411, 1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Fricker. Trusting Others in the Sciences. A Priori or Empirical Warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33:373–383, 2002

  • Goodwin C. Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3): 606–633, 1994

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hume D. An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. In L.A. Selby-Bigge, editor, Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. David Hume, p. 1777. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1902

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde D. Bodies in Technology. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis & London, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. Critique of Judgement. Trans. J.C. Meredith, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1952

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller E.F. Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors and Machines. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp M. Visualizations: The ‹Nature’ Book of Art and Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler E.A. Resolving the Nebulae: The Science and Art of Representing M51. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 38: 477–491, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusch M., Lipton P. Testimony: A primer. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33: 209–217, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B. Visualisation and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present. 6: 1–40, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefèvre W. Galileo Engineer: Art and Modern Science. Science in Context, 14: 11–27, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M., Edgerton S.Y. Jr. Aesthetics and digital image processing: Representational Craft in Contemporary Astronomy. In G. Fyfe and J. Law, editor, Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations. pp. 184–220. Routledge, London, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister J. Beauty and Revolution in Science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca & London, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Origgi G. Is Trust and Epistemological Notion? Episteme, 1: 1–12, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid T. An Inquiry into the Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. In W.H. Bart, editor, The Works of Thomas Reid. Maclachlan & Stewart, Edinburgh, 1764

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein R.S. Aesthetic Cognition. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 16(1): 61–77, 2002

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer J. Sensus Communis in Vico and Gadamer. New Vico Studies, 5: 117–130, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin S. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in 17th Century England. University of Chicago Press, Chicago London, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber A.I. editor. The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Welsh, M. Jirotka, and D. Gavaghan. Post-Genomic Science: Cross-disciplinary and Large-Scale Collaborative Research and its Organisational and Technological Challenges for the Scientific Research Process. Philosophical Transactions, Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 364(1843): 1533–1549, 2006.

  • E. Winsberg. Models of Success vs. the Success of the Models: Reliability Without Truth. Synthese, 152: 1–19, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Research for the `Visualisations' section of this article was supported by ESRC grant no RES 149-25-1022. I would like to thank two anonymous referees for commentary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annamaria Carusi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carusi, A. Scientific visualisations and aesthetic grounds for trust. Ethics Inf Technol 10, 243–254 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9159-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9159-5

Keywords

Navigation