Abstract
Constructivism rejects the metaphysical position that “truth”, and thus knowledge in science, can represent an “objective” reality, independent of the knower. It modifies the role of knowledge from “true” representation to functional viability. In this interview, Ernst von Glasersfeld, the leading proponent of Radical Constructivism underlines the inaccessibility of reality, and proposes his view that the function of cognition is adaptive, in the biological sense: the adaptation is the result of the elimination of all that is not adapted. There is no rational way of knowing anything outside the domain of our experience and we construct our world of experiences. In addition to these philosophical claims, the interviewee provides some personal insights; he also gives some suggestions about better teaching and problem solving. These are the aspects of constructivism that have had a major impact on instruction and have modified the manner many of us teach. The process of teaching as linguistic communication, he says, needs to change in a way to involve actively the students in the construction of their knowledge. Because knowledge is not a transferable commodity, learning is mainly identified with the activity of the construction of personal meaning. This interview also provides glimpses on von Glasersfeld’s life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G.M. Bodner. Problem solving: the difference between what we do and what we tell students to do. University Chemistry Education 7: 37–45, 2003. Online at: http://www.rsc.org/uchemed/papers/2003/Bodner.htm
Lesh R., Doerr H.M. (eds) (2003). Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
Matthews M.R. (1994). Science Teaching. The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge, New York, p. 157
Osborne J.F. (1996) Beyond Constructivism. Science Education 80:53–82
Phillips D.C. (1995). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism. Educational Researcher 24:5–12, p. 5
Schwegler H. (2001). Physics Develops Unaffected by Constructivism. Foundation of Science 6:241–253, p. 247
Solomon J. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Constructivism. Studies in Science Education 23:1–19
Steffe L.P., von Glasersfeld E., Richards J., Cobb P. (1983). Children’s Counting Types: Philosophy, Theory, and Application. Praeger Scientific, New York
von Glasersfeld E. (1989) Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching. Synthese 80:121–140
von Glasersfeld E. (1991). Introduction. In: von Glasersfeld E. (eds), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education. Kluwer, Dordrecht
von Glasersfeld E. (1995a). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Falmer Press, London
von Glasersfeld E. (1995b). A Constructivist Approach to Teaching. In: Steffe L.P., Gale J. (eds), Constructivism in Education. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
von Glasersfeld E. (2001). The Radical Constructivist View of Science. Foundation of Science 6:31–43
Watzlawick P. (eds) (1984). The Invented Reality How Do We Know What We Believe We Know? Contributions to Constructivism. Norton & Co. Inc., New York, p. 7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardellini, L. The Foundations of Radical Constructivism: An Interview with Ernst von Glasersfeld. Found Chem 8, 177–187 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-006-9012-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-006-9012-z