Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Views and Influence of Ernst Von Glasersfeld: An Introduction

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research into learners' ideas about science suggests that students often have alternative conceptions about important science concepts. Because of this dissatisfaction, constructivism has been adopted as a theoretical framework by many teachers and researchers, and it has had a curricular influence in many countries. Constructivism is much more than an educational doctrine and we are aware that a ‘science war’ about the possibility of objectivity is in progress. ‘Constructivism’ cannot necessary be a package deal: it must be possible to accept educational suggestions deemed useful without buying all the epistemology or the metaphysical implications. The claim that cognitive agents understand the world by constructing mental representations of it can be a shared suggestion for changing science instruction. Many teachers are much more concerned in finding productive teaching methods than about philosophical questions as if knowledge must be considered an objective representation of the real world or not. We have to ponder if some ideas from the constructivist theory of instruction can help instructors to become better teachers. The pragmatic suggestions that come from the constructivist theory of instruction developed by von Glasersfeld, the leading proponent of radical constructivism, could be a good start in this␣search.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bodner G.M., Klobuchar M., Geelan D. (2001) The Many Forms of Constructivism. Journal of Chemical Education 78:1107

    Google Scholar 

  • Foundations of Science 6(1–3): 1–237; (4): 239–398, 2001

  • Good R. (1993) The many forms of Constructivism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (9):1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes S.J. (1996) Buffer Calculations Deceive and Obscure. The Chemical Educator 6:S1430–4171

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Niaz, F.F. Abd-El-Khalick, A. Benarroch, L. Cardellini, C.E. Laburú, N. Marín, L.A. Montes, R. Nola, Y. Orlik, L.C. Scharmann, C.-C. Tsai and G. Tsaparlis. Constructivism: Defense or a Continual Critical Appraisal. A Response to Gil-Pérez et al., Science & Education 12: 787–797, 2003

  • E. von Glasersfeld. An Introduction to Radical Constructivism. In P.␣Watzlawick (Ed.), The Invented Reality. How Do We Know What We Believe We Know? Contributions to Constructivism, pp. 17–40. New York: Norton & Co. Inc., 1984

  • von Glasersfeld E. (1987) Construction of Knowledge. Salinas, CA: Intersystems Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld E. (1989) Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 80:121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. von Glasersfeld. Environment and Communication. In L.P. Steffe and T.␣Wood (Eds.), Trasforming Children’s Mathematics Education: International Perspectives, pp. 30–38. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990. As reported in: M.R. Matthews, Science Teaching. The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, p. 148. New York: Routledge, 1994

  • von Glasersfeld E. (1992) Questions and Answers about Radical Constructivism. In Pearsall MK (Ed). Scope, Sequence and Coordination of Secondary School Science. Volume II. Relevant Research, Washington, DC: The National Science Teachers Association, pp. 169–182

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld E. (1995) A Constructivist Approach to Teaching. In Steffe L.P. Gale J. (Eds). Constructivism in Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld E. (1995) Sensory Experience, Abstraction, and Teaching. In Steffe L.P., Gale J. (Eds). Constructivism in Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 369–383

    Google Scholar 

  • E. von Glasersfeld. Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position. In F. Steier (Ed.), Research and Reflexivity (Inquiries into Social Construction), pp. 12–29. London: Sage Publications, 1991. Online at http://www.mcgill.ca/douglas/fdg/kjf/17-TAGLA.htm

  • von Glasersfeld E. (2001) The radical constructivist view of science. Foundations of Science 6:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riegler A. (2001) Toward a radical constructivist understanding of science. Foundations of Science 6:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri E.R. (2003) Philosophical Confusion in Chemical Education Research. Journal of Chemical Education 80:468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liberato Cardellini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cardellini, L. The Views and Influence of Ernst Von Glasersfeld: An Introduction. Found Chem 10, 129–134 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-006-9022-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-006-9022-x

Keywords

Navigation