Abstract
This article aims at reconstructing the logic and assessing the force of Socrates' argument against Protagoras' 'Measure Doctrine' (MD) at Theaetetus 171a–c. I examine and criticise some influential interpretations of the passage, according to which, e.g., Socrates is guilty of ignoratio elenchi by dropping the essential Protagorean qualifiers or successfully proves that md is self-refuting provided the missing qualifiers are restored by the attentive reader. Having clarified the meaning of MD, I analyse in detail the broader section 170a–171d and argue, against an extensive scholarly consensus, (1) that it contains two slightly different formulations of the same argument, and not two (or three) distinct arguments, (2) that Socrates does not highlight his own strategy at 171a–c as especially clever, and (3) that his argument successfully shows that md turns out to be untenable for Protagoras himself when submitted to scrutiny in dialectical contexts, without aiming at proving its absolute falsehood. Finally, I clarify the philosophical import of the final image of Protagoras' momentary return from the underworld.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, E. P.: 1982, 'Plato, Theaetetus 171 A', Mnemosyne 35, 335–337.
Bailey, A. R.: 1997, 'Is Man the Measure?', Philosophical Inquiry 14, 71–84.
Bemelmans, R.: 2002, 'Why Does Protagoras Rush Off? Self-Refutation and Haste in Plato, Theaetetus 169a–171d', Ancient Philosophy 22, 75–86.
Bostock, D.: 1988, Plato's Theaetetus, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Brown, L.: 1993, 'Understanding the Theaetetus', Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 11, 199–224.
Burnet, J.: 1900, Platonis Opera: Tomus I, tetralogias I-II continens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burnyeat, M. F.: 1976a, 'Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy', Philosophical Review 85, 44–69.
Burnyeat, M. F.: 1976b, 'Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Plato's Theaetetus', Philosophical Review 85, 172–195.
Burnyeat, M. F.: 1982, 'Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed', Philosophical Review 91, 3–40.
Burnyeat, M. F.: 1990, The Theaetetus of Plato, translation by M. J. Levett, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Campbell, L.: 1861, The Theaetetus of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castagnoli, L.: 2000, 'Self-bracketing Pyrrhonism', Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18, 263–328.
Chappell, T. D. J.: 1995, 'Does Protagoras Refute Himself?', Classical Quarterly 45, 333–338.
Chappell, T. D. J.: 2000, Plato: Theaetetus, Part 3, Section 8, Project Archelogos.
Cooper, J. L. III: 1998, Attic Greek Prose Syntax, after K. W. Krüger, 2 vols., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Cooper, J. M.: 1990, Plato's Theaetetus, New York-London: Garland.
Cornford, F. M.: 1935, Plato's Theory of Knowledge: The Theaetetus and the Sophist of Plato translated with a running commentary, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Day, J. M.: 1997, 'The Theory of Perception in Plato's Theaetetus 152–183', Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 15, 51–80.
Denyer, N.: 1991, Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy, London-New York: Routledge.
De Pinotti, G. M.: 1999, 'Se auto-refuta el relativista Protágoras? Ensayo de reconstrucción de Teeteto 171a–c', Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 25, 295–317.
Diès, A.: 1924, Platon: Oeuvres complète, Tome VIII – 2e Partie: Théétète, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Emilsson, E. K.: 1994, 'Plato's Self-Refutation Argument in Theaetetus 171A–C Revisited', Phronesis 39, 136–149.
Fine, G.: 1994, 'Protagorean Relativisms', Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 10, 211–243.
Fine, G.: 1996, 'Conflicting Appearances: Tht. 153d–154b', in C. Gill and M. M. McCabe (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 105–133.
Fine, G.: 1998a, 'Plato's Refutation of Protagoras in the Theaetetus', Apeiron 31, 201–234.
Fine, G.: 1998b, 'Relativism and Self-Refutation: Plato, Protagoras, and Burnyeat', in J. Gentzler (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 137–163.
Ford, A.: 1994, 'Protagoras' Head: Interpreting Philosophic Fragments in the Theaetetus', American Journal of Philology 115, 199–218.
Gottlieb, P.: 1992, 'The Principle of Non-Contradiction and Protagoras: The Strategy of Aristotle's Metaphysics IV 4', Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 8, 183–198.
Grote, G.: 1875, Plato and the other Companions of Sokrates, 3 vols., London: Murray, vol. II.
Guthrie, W. K. C.: 1978, A History of Greek Philosophy, Volume 5: The Later Plato and the Academy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haden, J.: 1984, 'Did Plato Refute Protagoras?', History of Philosophy Quarterly 1, 225–240.
Hicken, W. F.: 1995, '?EAITHTO?', in E. A. Duke, W. F. Hicken, W. S. M. Nicoll, D. B. Robinson and J. C. G. Strachan (eds.), Platonis Opera: Tomus I, tetralogias I-II continens, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–382.
Kerferd, G. B.: 1949, 'Plato's Account of the Relativism of Protagoras', Durham University Journal 42, 20–26.
Ketchum, R. J.: 1992, 'Plato's “Refutation” of Protagorean Relativism: Theaetetus 170–171', Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 10, 73–105.
Lee, E. N.: 1973, 'Hoist With his Own Petard: Ironic and Comic Elements in Plato's Critique of Protagoras (Tht. 161–171)', in E. N. Lee, A. P. D. Mourelatos and R. M. Rorty (eds.), Exegesis PROTAGORAS REFUTED 31 and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy presented to Gregory Vlastos, Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 225–261.
Lee, M.: 2000, 'The Secret Doctrine: Plato's Defence of Protagoras in the Theaetetus', Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 19, 47–86.
Long, A.: 2004, 'Refutation and Relativism in Theaetetus 161–171', Phronesis 49, forthcoming.
Matthen, M.: 1985, 'Perception, Relativism, and Truth: Reflections on Plato's Theaetetus 152–160', Dialogue 24, 33–58.
McCabe, M. M.: 2000, Plato and his Predecessors: The Dramatisation of Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDowell, J.: 1973, Plato: Theaetetus, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Narcy, M.: 1986, 'A qui la parole? Platon et Aristote face à Protagoras', in B. Cassin (ed.), Positions de la sophistique, Paris: Vrin, pp. 75–90.
Narcy, M.: 1989, 'Platon revu et corrigé', in B. Cassin and M. Narcy, La décision du sens: Le livre Gamma de la Métaphysique d'Aristote, Paris: Vrin, pp. 61–110.
Narcy, M.: 1995, Platon: Théétète, 2e édition corrigée, Paris: Flammarion.
Newman, J.: 1982, 'The Recoil Argument', Apeiron 16, 47–52.
Passmore, J. A.: 1961, Philosophical Reasoning, New York: Scribner's.
Polansky, R. M.: 1992, Philosophy and Knowledge: A Commentary on Plato's Theaetetus, Lewisburg-London: Bucknell University Press-Associated University Presses.
Rezendes, P. M.: 2001, 'A Footnote to Plato: An Introduction to Plato's Theaetetus', The Examined Life (On-line Philosophy Journal) 2.
Runciman, W. G.: 1962, Plato's Later Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sayre, K. M.: 1969, Plato's Analytic Method, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tigner, S. S.: 1971, 'The “Exquisite” Argument at Tht. 171 A', Mnemosyne 24, 366–369.
Vailati, G.: 1904, 'A proposito di un passo del Teeteto e di una dimostrazione di Euclide', Rivista di Filosofia e Scienze Affini 6, 5–15.
Vlastos, G. (ed.): 1956, Plato: Protagoras, with B. Jowett's translation extensively revised by M. Ostwald, Indianapolis-New York: Liberal Arts Press.
Waterfield, R. A. H.: 1987, Plato: Theaetetus, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Waterlow, S.: 1977, 'Protagoras and Inconsistency: Theaetetus 171a6–c7', Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 59, 19–36.
White, F. C.: 1989, 'Self-Refuting Propositions and Relativism', Metaphilosophy 20, 84–92.
Wohlrab, M.: 1891, Platonis Theaetetus, Leipzig: Teubner.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castagnoli, L. Protagoras Refuted: How Clever is Socrates' "Most Clever" Argument at Theaetetus 171a–c?'. Topoi 23, 3–32 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TOPO.0000021381.34686.0d
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TOPO.0000021381.34686.0d