Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing institutions to encourage the use of animal wastes as production inputs

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animal feeding operations have come under increased scrutiny as sources of water pollution. Due to the concentration of animals at individual locations and in certain regions, the local environment may not be able to use all of the nutrients contained in the manure. Particularly, problematic are waters being impaired by nitrogen and phosphorus from animal manure. Since federal and state regulations have not been totally successful in precluding water contamination from manure nutrients, scientists and policymakers might seek ways to encourage the use of manure as a resource for crop production. By analyzing diverse state regulations, this paper identifies several strategies that would treat animal waste as a recyclable production input rather than a production byproduct. Citizens and regulators can encourage more sustainable livestock production by proffering regulations that mandate selected production requirements or practices. Agronomic rate regulations, limitations on manure application and timing, lagoon safety requirements, closure mandates, and alternative uses of manure constitute possibilities to remedy some pollution problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araji, A. A., Z. O. Abdo, and P. Joyce (2001). ''Efficient use of animal manure on cropland: Economic analysis.'' Bioresource Technology 79: 179-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkansas Acts (2003). No. 1061 (to be codified at Arkansas Code Annotated §§ 15-20-1101 through 15-20-1114, effective January 1, 2004).

  • Beegle, D. B., O. T. Carton, and J. S. Baily (2000). ''Nutrient management planning: justification, theory, practice.'' Journal of Environmental Quality 29: 72-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, D. J. and K. B. Napit (1992). ''Economics of transporting poultry litter to achieve more effective use as fertilizer.'' Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47: 342-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centner, T. J. (2000). ''Animal feeding operations: encouraging sustainable nutrient usage rather than restraining and proscribing activities.'' Land Use Policy 17: 233-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centner, T. J. (2003). Governmental Oversight of Animal Feeding Operations. Fayetteville, Arkansas: National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information, University of Arkansas School of Law (http://www. nationalaglawcenter. org/publications/index.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, I. J. M., P. L. Van der Togt, M. Grossman, and R. P. Kwakkel (2000). ''Nutrient flows for poultry production in The Netherlands.'' Poultry Science 79: 172-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A. and A. Xepapadeas (1998). ''Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture.'' Journal of Environmental Management 54: 273-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drohan, J. and C. W. Abdalla (1999). Alternative Funding for Agricultural Best Management Practices in Pennsylvania. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, College of Agricultural Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzikiewicz, M. (2000). ''Activities in nonpoint pollution control in rural areas of Poland.'' Ecological Engineering 14: 429-434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. R., T. C. Daniel, H. D. Scott, J. F. Murdoch, M. J. Habiger, and H. M. Burks (1996). ''Stream quality impacts of best management practices in a northwestern Arkansas basin.'' Water Resources Bulletin 32(3): 499-509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (1998). Compliance Assurance Implementation Plan for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2000a). Draft Guidance Manual and Example NPDES Permit for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, Final Internal Draft. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Wastewater Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2000b). National Water Quality Inventory: 1998 Report to Congress. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2001a). ''National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations: proposed regulation.'' Federal Register 66: 2960-3145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2001b). State Compendium: Programs and Regulatory Activities Related to Animal Feeding Operations. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Wastewater Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2001c). ''Notice of data availability. National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations.'' Federal Register 66: 58555-58607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2001d). Managing Manure Nutrients at Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Water, EPA-821-R-01-017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2003). ''National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations.'' Federal Register 68: 7176-7274 (to be codified at 40 Code of Federal Regulations, parts 122 and 412 (effective April 14, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (1991). ''Council Directive of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources.'' Official Journal L 375: 0001-0008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faucette, B. (2001). ''Georgia builds poultry litter composting infrastructure.'' Biocycle 42: 23-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, R. A. and J. D. Long (2002). ''Animal waste management: Measuring the cost of restricting access to cropland for manure nutrient management.'' Agronomy Journal 94: 57-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, R. A., B. A. Babcock, and E.Wang (1998). ''Resource or wasté The economics of swine manure storage and management.'' Review of Agricultural Economics 20: 96-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, J. (2000). ''Forget windmills, here comes turkey power.'' Business Week, October 2.

  • Gburek, W. J., A. N. Sharpley, L. Heathwaite, and G. J. Folmar (2000). ''Phosphorus management at the watershed scale: A modification of the phosphorus index.'' Journal of Environmental Quality 29: 130-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgia Compiled Rules and Regulations (2001). Rules 391-3-6-.20 & 391-3-6-.21.

  • Gollehon, N., M. Caswell, M. Ribaudo, R. Kellogg, C. Lander, and D. Letson (2001) Confined Animal Production and Manure Nutrients. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, C. (2001). ''Delmarva hen waste heads west.'' The Baltimore Sun, July 10, p. 1A.

  • Heathwaite, L., A. Sharpley, and W. Gburek (2000). ''A conceptual approach for integrating phosphorus and nitrogen management at watershed scales.'' Journal of Environmental Quality 29: 158-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlder, V. (2001). ''Chicken power fuels Scotland.'' Financial Times, May 31, p. 2.

  • Illinois Administrative Code (2001). Title 35, subtitle E, part 506.

  • Illinois Compiled Statutes Annotated (2001). Chapter 510, Sections 77/15, 77/17; 77/20.

  • Indiana Administrative Code (2002). Title 327, article 16.

  • Innes, R. (2000). ''The economics of livestock waste and its regulation.'' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 97-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iowa Administrative Code (1999). Section 567-65.19.

  • Iowa Code (1999). Section 455J.2.

  • Jackson, L. L., D. R. Keeney, and E. M. Gilbert (2000). ''Swine manure management plans in north-central Iowa: nutrient loading and policy implications.'' Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55: 205-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, A. W., N. P. Lenis, and Z. Mroz (1997). ''Impact of nutrition on reduction of environmental pollution by pigs: an overview of recent research.'' The Veterinary Quarterly 19: 130-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koelsch, R. and G. Lesoing (1999). ''Nutrient balance on Nebraska livestock confinement systems.'' Journal of Animal Science 77(Suppl.): 63-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronvang, B., G. R. Larsen, S. E. Svendsen, and L. M. Andersen (1995). ''Non-point-source nutrient losses to the aquatic environment in Denmark: impact of agriculture.'' Marine and Freshwater Research 46: 167-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, A., F. Mandersloot, and R. L. G. Zom (1999). ''An approach to nutrient management on dairy farms.'' Journal of Animal Science 77(Suppl. 2): 84-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J. D. and G. Grimes (2001). ''Production and Marketing Characteristics of US Pork Producers, 2000.'' Staff Paper No. 343, Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. J. and R. E. Howitt (1996). ''Modeling regional agricultural production and salinity control alternatives for water quality policy analysis.'' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 41-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letson, D., N. Gollehon, V. Breneman, C. Kascak, and C. Mose (1998). ''Confined animal production and groundwater protection.'' Review of Agricultural Economics 20: 348-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maryland Agriculture Code Annotated (2001). Sections 8-704.1, 8-702, 8-803.3.

  • Matthiessen, P., R. J. Allchin, R. J. Williams, S. C. Bird, D. Brooke, and P. J. Glendinning (1992). ''The translocation of some herbicides between soil and water in a small catchment.'' Journal of the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management 6: 496-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, W. D. and N. Key (2003). Economic and Structural Relationships in US Hog Production. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Report No. 818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, M. (2000). ''State legislation regulating animal manure management.'' Review of Agricultural Economics 22: 519-532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. and D. D. Mullinax (1999). ''Livestock nutrient management concerns: regulatory and legislative overview.'' Journal of Animal Science 77 (Suppl.): 51-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota Rules (2000). Chapter 7020.

  • Moore, P. A., T. C. Daniel, and D. R., Edwards (2000). ''Reducing phosphorus runoff and inhibiting ammonia loss from poultry manure with aluminum sulfate.'' Journal of Environmental Quality 29: 37-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeteson, J. J. (2000). ''Nitrogen and phosphorus management on Dutch dairy farms: Legislation and strategies employed to meet the regulations.'' Biology and Fertility of Soils 30: 566-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • North Carolina General Statutes (2000). Section 90A-47.3.

  • Oenema, O., P. C. M. Boers, M. M. van Eerdt, B. Fraters, H. G. van der Meer, C. W. J. Roest, J. J. Schrder, and W. J. Willems (1998). ''Leaching of nitrate from agriculture to groundwater: the effect of policies and measures in The Netherlands.'' Environmental Pollution 102: 471-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Food Industry Programs (2000). ''Georgia takes a strategic look at poultry litter and manure management alternatives.'' Poultry Technology 12(2): 1; Atlanta, Georgia: Agricultural Technology Research Program. Georgia Tech Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oklahoma Administrative Code (2000). Title 35, chapter 17, subchapter 3.

  • Oklahoma Statutes (2000). Title 2, § 9-209.1.

  • Parker, D. (2000). ''Controlling agricultural nonpoint water pollution: Costs of implementing the Maryland Water Quality Improvement Act of 1998.'' Agricultural Economics 24: 23-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, R. (1998). ''Agricultural phosphorus and water quality: A US Environmental Protection Agency perspective.'' Journal of Environmental Quality 27: 258-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejesus, R. M. and R. H. Hornbaker (1999). ''Economic and environmental evaluation of alternative pollution-reducing nitrogen management practices in central Illinois.'' Agricultural, Ecosystems and Environment 75: 41-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, V. J. (1995). ''The industrialization of hog production.'' Review of Agricultural Economics 17: 107-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo, M. (1989). Water Quality Benefits from the Conservation Reserve Program. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economics Report No. 606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. W. (2000). ''Lessons from the flood: will Floyd change livestock farming.'' Environmental Health Perspectives 180(2): A74-A77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schou, J. S., E. Skop, and J. D. Jensen (2000). ''Integrated agri-environmental modelling: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two nitrogen tax instruments in the Vejle Fjord watershed, Denmark.'' Journal of Environmental Management 58: 199-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, A. (1999). ''Agricultural phosphorus, water quality, and poultry production: are they compatible.'' Journal of Poultry Science 78: 660-673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, A. N. (1996). ''Availability of residual phosphorus in manured soils.'' Soil Science Society of America Journal 60: 1459-1466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, A., B. Foy, and P. Withers (2000). ''Practical and innovative measures for the control of agricultural phosphorus losses to water: an overview.'' Journal of Environmental Quality 29: 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, J. (2000). Evaluation of Comprehensive Approaches Needed to Improve the Handling of Farm Animal Manure and Benefit the Environment and the Farming Industry. Knoxville, Tennessee: Joint Institute for Energy and Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, J. T, A. C. Edwards, O. F. Schoumans, and R. R. Simard (2000). ''Integrating soil phosphorus testing into environmentally based agricultural management practices.'' Journal of Environmental Quality 29: 60-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, J. A., K. A. Lewis, K. S. Bardon, P. Tucker, J. A. Catt, and B. J. Chambers. (1997). ''An overview of the environmental impact of agriculture in the UK.'' Journal of Environmental Management 50: 111-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. A. and J. P. Frost (2000). ''Nitrogen excretion by farm livestock with respect to land spreading requirements and controlling nitrogen losses to ground and surface waters. Part 1. Cattle and sheep.'' Bioresource Technology 71: 173-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. A., D. R. Charles, and D. Moorhouse (2000). ''Nitrogen excretion by farm livestock with respect to land spreading requirements and controlling nitrogen losses to ground and surface waters. Part 2. Pigs and poultry.'' Bioresource Technology 71: 183-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. (1997). ''Nutrients.'' In Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 1996-1997. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook No. 712.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Code Annotated (2001). Title 33.

  • US Code of Federal Regulations (2001). Title 40, parts 122 & 412.

  • US Department of Agriculture (1963). Agricultural Statistics 1963. Washington, DC.

  • US Department of Agriculture (1990). Field Office Technical Guide, National Handbook of Conservation Practices. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture (1998). Agricultural Statistics 1998. Washington, DC.

  • US Department of Agriculture (2000). Comprehensive Nutrient Management Planning Technical Guidance. Washington, DC.

  • US Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency (1999). Unified National Strategy for Animal Feeding Operations. Washington, DC.

  • US General Accounting Office (1995). Animal Agriculture: Information on Waste Management and Water Quality Issues. Washington, DC: GAO/RCED-95-200BR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valk, H., J. A. Metcalf, and P. J. A. Withers (2000). ''Prospects for minimizing phosphorus excretion in ruminants by dietary manipulation.'' Journal of Environmental Quality 29: 28-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers, P. J. A. and S. C. Jarvis (1998). ''Mitigation options for diffuse phosphorus loss to water.'' Soil Use and Management 14: 186-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zebarth B. J., J. W. Paul, and R. Van Kleeck (1999). ''The effect of nitrogen management in agricultural production on water and air quality: Evaluation on a regional scale.'' Agricultural, Ecosystems and Environment 72: 35-52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The University of Georgia, 301 Conner Hall, Georgia, USA)

    Terence J. centner

Authors
  1. Terence J. centner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

centner, T.J. Developing institutions to encourage the use of animal wastes as production inputs. Agriculture and Human Values 21, 367–375 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-003-1223-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-003-1223-5

Search

Navigation