Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cell sociology: A way of reconsidering the current concepts of morphogenesis

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Research in the field of planarian regeneration on the one hand, and a general survey of embryology on the other, throw doubt upon the reality of supra-cellular controls, which are still at the basis of all modern concepts of morphogenesis. The necessity of referring to such controls, which have never been convincingly demonstrated, is probably due to the fact that two aspects of cell behaviour have been underestimated: 1) the capacity of cells to change their individualities for a time independently of other cells; 2) the social behaviour of cells, which is the consequence of the reciprocal exchange of information. Pattern formation and pattern remodeling in normal development results from readjustments of cell populations to local or global changes. The common responses of cell populations to disturbances are enhanced mitotic activity, cessation of specific syntheses and cell migration. In the young embryo these may promptly restore the unity of the injured primordium, leading to so-called restitution; this is based on a normal sequence of further readjustments in the primordium. In older organisms the same responses give rise to cell interactions which may be the starting point for further sequential readjustments (regeneration) — in some instances these are comparable to those that originally organized the primordium in question during development. The desirability of giving up the notion of morphogenetic field is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barth, L. G. (1941). Neural differentiation without organizer. - J. exp. Zool. 87, p. 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boterenbrood, E. C. (1962). On pattern formation in the prosencephalon. An investigation on disaggregated and reaggregated presumptive prosencephalic material of neurulae of Triturus alpestris. — Thesis, Univ. Utrecht Ned.

  • Boterenbrood, E. C. (1970). Differentiation in small grafts of the median region of the presumptive prosencephalon. - J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 23, p. 751–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boterenbrood, E. C. & P. D. Nieuwkoop (1973). The formation of the mesoderm of urodelean amphibians. V. Its regional induction by the endoderm. - Roux Arch. Entw. Mech. Organ. 173, p. 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, A. L. (1966). A model of growth and cell differentiation in Hydra. -Amer. Nat. 100, p. 165–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandebois, R. (1957). Recherches expérimentales sur la régénération de la Planaire marine Procerodes lobata. - Bull. biol. 91, p. 1–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandebois, R. (1976a). Morphogdndtique des animaux pluricellulaires. - Paris, Maloine Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandebois, R. (1976b). Histogenesis and morphogenesis in planarian regeneration. (Monogr. for developm. Biol. Vol. 11) - Bâle, Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, C. M. (1941). Patterns and problems of development. - Chicago, Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. H. C. (1971). The scale of pattern formation. - Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 25, (Control mechanism of growth and differentiation), p. 429–438. London, New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. E. & A. L. Burnett (1964). A study of growth and cell differentiation in the hepatopancreas of the cray-fish.- Develop. Biol. 10, p. 122–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defretin, R. (1949). Recherches sur la musculature des Néréidiens au cours de l'épitoquie.- Ann. Inst. ocdanogr. Monaco 24, p. 117–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettlaff, T. A. (1964). Cell divisions, duration of interkinetic states of differentiation in early stages of embryonic development. - Adv. Morphogenesis 3, p. 323–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, J. D. & M. E. Kaighn (1966). Keys to change: factors regulating differentiation. - In: M. Locke, ed., Major problems in developmental biology, p. 29–84. - New York & London, Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ede, D. E. (1971). Control of form and pattern in the vertebrate limb. - Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 25, (Control mechanisms of growth and differentiation), p. 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, L. M. & A. A. Barton (1960). The effects of testosterone on the ultra-structure of the mouse prostate in vivo and in organ culture.- Exp. Cell Res. 19, p. 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudice, G. & V. Mutolo (1970). Reaggregation of dissociated cells of sea-urchin embryos. - Adv. Morphogenesis 8, p. 115–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B. C. (1969). A phase-shift model for the spatial and temporal organization of developing systems. - J. theor. Biol. 25, p. 49–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, T. (1965). Morphogenetic significance and biochemical patterns in sea-urchin embryo. - In: R. Weber, ed., The biochemistry of animal development, I, p. 140–202. - New York, Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadorn, E. (1963). Differenzierungsleitungen wiederholt fragmentierter Teilstdcke männlicher Genitalscheiben von Drosophila melanogaster nach Kultur in vivo. - Develop. Biol. 7, p. 617–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadorn, E. (1966). Dynamics of determination. - In: M. Locke, ed., Major problems in development biology, p. 85–102. - New York, Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, E. D. (1968). Dedifferentiation and metaplasia in vertebrate and invertebrate regeneration. - In: H. Ursprung, ed., Results and problems in cell differentiation. Vol. I. The stability of the differentiated state, p. 85–105. - New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helff, O. M. (1928). Studies of amphibian metamorphosis. III. The influence of the annular tympanic cartilage in the formation of the tympanic membrane. - Physiol. Zoöl. 1, p. 463–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, A. G. (1966). Inductive processes in embryonic development. - Science 152, p. 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshland, D. E. & M. E. Kirtley (1966). Protein structure in relation to cell dynamics and differentiation. - In: M. Locke, ed., Major problems in developmental biology, p. 217–250.- New York, Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. A. (1966). Gradients in the insect segment: the orientation of hairs in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus. - J. exp. Biol. 44, p. 607–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lender, T. (1950). émonstration du rôle organisateur du cerveau dans la régénération des yeux de la planaire Polycelis nigra par la méthode des greffes. - C. R. Soc. Biol., Paris 144, p. 1407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopashov, G. V. & O. G. Stroeva (1964). Development of the eye. Experimental studies. (Transl. from Russian) - Jerusalem, Israel Program for Scientific Translations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Laren, A. (1974). Physiology and genetics of reproduction. Part B. - In: E. M. Coutinho & F. Fuchs, ed., Embryogenesis, p. 297–316. - New York, Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Loughlin, C. B. (1963). Mesenchymal influences on epithelial differentiation. - Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 17, p. 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, L. & M. Sigot (1963). Evolution d'une ébauche épithéliale au contact d'une surface ayant porté un mésenchyme inducteur. - C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris 257, p. 3475–3477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop, P. D. (1966). Induction and pattern formation as primary mechanisms in early embryonic differentiation. - In: Cell differentiation and morphogenesis, p. 120–143.- Internat. Lecture Course, Wageningen, The Netherlands. - Amsterdam, North Holland Publ. Comp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop, P. D. (1967a). Problems of embryonic induction and pattern formation in amphibians and birds. - Exp. Biol. Med. 1, p. 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop. P. D. (1967b). The organization centre. II. Field phenomena, their origin and significance. - Acts biotheor., Leiden 17, p. 151–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop, P. D. (1967c). The organization centre. III. Segregation and pattern formation in morphogenetic fields. - Acta biotheor., Leiden 17, p. 178–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop, P. D. (1969). The formation of the mesoderm in urodelean amphibians. I. The induction by the endoderm. - Roux Arch. EntwMech. Organ. 162, p. 341–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop, P. D. (1973). The ‘organization centre’ of the amphibian embryo: its. origin, spatial organization and morphogenetic action. - Adv. Morphogenesis 10, p. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, Y. K. & H. Sugino (1937). Transplantation experiments in Planaria gonocephala. - Jap. J. Zool. 7, p. 373–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, C. P. (1948). On the concepts of experimental embryology. - Folia biotheor., Leiden III, p. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyer, R. W. (1950). An experimental study of lens regeneration in Triturus viridescens viridescens. II. Lens development from the dorsal iris in the absence of the embryonic lens. - J. exp. Zool. 113, p. 317–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynaud, G. (1969). Phénomènes de régulation dans les populations de gonocytes primordiaux de Dindon injectés à des embryons de Poulet stérilisés. - C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris 268, p. 2275–2278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. M. (1974). Regeneration: Key to understanding normal and abnormal growth and development. - New York. Appleton Century Crofts; Meredith Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. W. & J. F. Fallon (1966). Cell death in morphogenesis. - In: M. Locke, ed., Major problems in developmental biology, p. 289–316. - New York, Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. W. & M. T. Gasseling (1968). Ectodermal-mesenchhmml interactions in the origin of limb asymmetry. - In: R. Fleischmajor & R. E. Bilhngham, ed., Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, p. 78–97. - Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxen, L., O. Koskimies, A. Lahtii, H. Miettinen, J. Rapola & J. Wartiovaara (1968). Differentiation of kidney mesenchyme in an experimental model system. - Adv. Morphogenesis 7, p. 251–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxen, L. & E. Saksela (1971). Transmission and spread of embryonic induction. 11. Exclusion of an assimilatory transmission mechanism in kidney tubule induction. - Exp. Cell Res. 66, p. 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarano, E., B. de Petrocellis & G. Augusti-Tocco (1964). Deoxycytidylate aminohydrolase content in disaggregated cells from sea urchin embryos. - Exp. Cell Res. 36, p. 211–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schewtschenko, N. N. (1937). Die Wechselwirkung von Teilen von verschiedener physiologischer Aktivität bei Planarien. - Biol. Zbl. 6, p. 581–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J. (1965). Genes, differentiation and animal development. Genetic control of differentiation. - New York, Brookhaven Nat. Lab. Upton, p. 116–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilern-Aspang, F. & K. Kratochwil (1965). Relation between regeneration and tumor growth. In: V. Kiortsis & H. A. L. Trampusch, ed., Regeneration in animals and related problems, V, p. 452–473. - Amsterdam, North-Holland Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, M. S. (1964). The problem of adhesive selectivity in cellular interactions. - In: M. Locke, ed., Cellular membranes in development, p. 321–366. - New York, Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, H. (1966). Zellspezifische Determination und Beziehung zwischen Proliferation und Transdetermination in Bein- und Flügelprimordien von Drosophila melanogaster. - J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 16, p. 609–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivonen, S. (1967). Mechanism of primary embryonic induction. - Exp. Biol. Med. 1, p. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townes, P. & J. Holtfreter (1955). Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells.- J. exp. Zool. 128, p. 53–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trampusch, H. A. L. & A. E. Harrebomée (1965). Dedifferentiation, a prerequisite of regeneration. - In: V. Kiortsis & H. A. L. Trampusch, ed., Regeneration in animals and related problems, V, p. 341–376. - Amsterdam, North-Holland Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, J. P. (1966). Morphogenetic cell movements. - In: M. Locke, ed., Major problems in developmental biology, p. 125–176. - New York, Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C. H. (1956). Principles of embryology.- London, G. Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C. H. (1966). Fields and gradients. - In: M. Locke, ed., Major problems in developmental biology, p. 105–124. - New York, Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessells, N. K. & F. H. Wilt (1965). Action of actinomycin D on exocrine pancreas cell differentiation. - J. mot. Biol. 13, p. 767–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J. R. (1968). Translational competition as a possible basis of modulation in retinal pigment cell cultures. - J. exp. Zool. 169, p. 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, C. E. (1961). Factors concerning the degree of cellular differentiation in organotypic and disaggregated tissue cultures. La culture organotypique. - Colloq. int. Cent. nat. Rech. sci. 101, p. 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, E. (1962). Recent researches on the regeneration of planarians. - In: D. Rudnick, ed., 20th Growth Symposium, Regeneration, p. 58–84. - New York, Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, L. (1969). Positional information and the spatial pattern of cell differentiation. - J. theor. Biol. 25, p. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, T. (1940). Beeinflussung der Differenzierungsleitungen des isolierten Mesodermsvon Molchkeimen durch zugefügtes Chorda- und Neuralmaterial. - Folia anat. jap. 19, p. 132–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, T. (1967). Cellular synthetic activities in induction of tissue transformation. - In: A. V. S. De Reuck & J. Krugel, ed., Cell differentiation (CIBA Foundation Symposium), p. 116–130. - Boston, Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwilling, E. (1968). Morphogenetic phases in development. - In: M. Locke, ed., The emergence of order in developing systems (Symp. Soc. develop. Biol.), p. 184–207. - New York, Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Provence, Marseille, France

    Rosine Chandebois

Authors
  1. Rosine Chandebois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chandebois, R. Cell sociology: A way of reconsidering the current concepts of morphogenesis. Acta Biotheor 25, 71–102 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047320

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047320

Keywords

Search

Navigation