Skip to main content
Log in

Measures of Deprivation and their Meaning in Terms of Social Satisfaction

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes relative and absolute measures of deprivation using social satisfaction functions. The relative (absolute) measure gives us the amount by which social satisfaction can be increased in proportional (absolute) terms by redistributing incomes equally. We also demonstrate the existence of a relationship between summary indices of deprivation (including the Gini coefficient, the maximin index, the coefficient of variation and their absolute counterparts) and social satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Amiel, Y. and Cowell F.A. (1994) Inequality changes and income growth, in W. Eichhorn (ed.) Models and Measurements of Welfare and Inequality, Springer Verlag, Berlin/New York, 3-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. (1970) On the measurement of inequality, Journal of Economic Theory 2(3): 244-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrebi, Z.M. and Silber J. (1985) Income inequality indices and deprivation: a generalization, Quarterly Journal of Economics 100(3): 807-810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R. (1990) Ethical Social Index Numbers, Springer Verlag, Berlin/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R. (1997) Relative deprivation and satisfaction orderings, Keio Economic Studies 34(2): 17-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R. and Chakraborty A.B. (1984) On indices of relative depriva-tion, Economics Letters 14(3): 283-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R. and Chattopadhyay N. (1994) An ethical index of relative deprivation, Research on Economic Inequality 5: 231-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R., Chattopadhyay N. and Majumder, A. (1995) Income inequal-ity and relative deprivation, Keio Economic Studies 32(1): 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J.D. and Lambert P.J. (1980) Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient: Comment, Quarterly Journal of Economics 95(3): 567-573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N.C. (1984) The relative deprivation curve and its applications, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2(3): 384-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.C.: (1976) Unequal inequalities I', Journal of Economic Theory 12(3): 416-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. (1991) An index of relative deprivation, Economics Letters 36(3): 337-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W.G. (1966) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O. and Yitzhaki S. (1988) Labour migration as a response to relative deprivation, Journal of Population Economics 1(1): 57-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, N. (1979) Poverty, income inequality and their measures: Professor Sen's axiomatic approach reconsidered, Econometrica 47(3): 747-759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, L. (1986) Inequality, Philosophy and Public Affairs 15(1): 99-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S. (1979) Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient, Quarterly Journal of Economics 93(2): 321-324.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chakravarty, S.R., Mukherjee, D. Measures of Deprivation and their Meaning in Terms of Social Satisfaction. Theory and Decision 47, 89–100 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005086804195

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005086804195

Navigation