Event Abstract

Oscillatory responses to conscious and unconscious figure perception

  • 1 University of Utrecht, Netherlands
  • 2 University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

For the conscious visual perception of figures, different neuronal connection types (feedforward, feedback) are needed. Feedback processing is necessary to segregate a figure from its background and consciously perceive the figure (Lamme, 2000). Recent studies have shown that the feedforward sweep is sufficient for neural object classification, without conscious awareness of the figure (Fahrenfort et al., in preparation). Here we used EEG to study event-related and oscillatory brain responses to conscious (feedforward + feedback) and unconscious (feedforward) figure processing. Eighteen subjects saw schematic pictures of faces, houses and nonsense objects. Pictures were rendered visible (conscious) or invisible (unconscious) using a dichoptic fusion paradigm. The event-related potential showed a negative peak over midline occipital electrodes for both visible and invisible figures from 80-125 ms after stimulus onset, followed by a second negativity from 125-250 ms for the visible condition only. In response to visible figure-ground segregation only, an increase in theta (4-6 Hz) and high gamma (50-80 Hz) power, and a decrease in beta-band activity (12-20 Hz) was seen over bilateral peri-occipital electrodes. Thus, the oscillatory activity in the theta and gamma band, as seen in this study, is a reflection of recurrent processing necessary for figure-ground segregation and a conscious percept.

Keywords: Awareness, Feedback

Conference: XI International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON XI), Palma, Mallorca, Spain, 25 Sep - 29 Sep, 2011.

Presentation Type: Poster Presentation

Topic: Poster Sessions: Consciousness and Awareness

Citation: Snijders TM, Fahrenfort JJ, Lamme VA and Kemner C (2011). Oscillatory responses to conscious and unconscious figure perception. Conference Abstract: XI International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON XI). doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2011.207.00053

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 15 Nov 2011; Published Online: 25 Nov 2011.

* Correspondence: Dr. Tineke M Snijders, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, t.snijders@donders.ru.nl