Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

ON THE APPLICABILITY OF THE QUANTUM MEASUREMENT FORMALISM

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Customary discussions of quantum measurements are unrealistic, in the sense that they do not reflect what happens in most actual measurements even under ideal circumstances. Even theories of measurement which discard the projection postulate tend to retain two unrealistic assumptions of the von Neumann theory: that a measurement consists of a single physical interaction, and that the topic of every measurement is information wholly contained in the quantum state of the object of measurement. I suggest that these unrealistic assumptions originate from an overly literal interpretation of the operator formalism of quantum mechanics. I also suggest, following Park, that some issues can be clarified by distinguishing the sense of the term ''measurement'' occurring in the quantum-mechanical operator formalism, and the sense of ''measurement'' that refers to actual processes of gaining information about the physical world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Article Open access 05 August 2022

Roman Rietsche, Christian Dremel, … Jan-Marco Leimeister

REFERENCES

  • Briggs, G. H.: 1928, 'A Redetermination of the Velocities of α Particles from Radium C, Thorium C and C′', Proceedings of the Royal Society 118A, 549-557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1983a, 'How the Measurement Problem is an Artifact of the Mathematics', in R. Swinburne (ed.), Space, Time and Causality, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 125-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1983b, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.: 1995a, 'Circularity and Reliability in Measurement', Perspectives on Science 3, 153-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.: 1995b, 'The Quantum Counter-Revolution: Internal Conflicts in Scientific Change', Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26, 121-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Tannoudji, C., B. Diu, and F. Laloë: 1977, Quantum Mechanics, S. R. Hemley, N. Ostrowsky and D. Ostrowsky (trans.),John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, A. H. and `A. W. Simon: 1925, 'Measurements of β-rays Associated with Scattered X-rays', Physical Review 25, 306-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Espagnat, B.: 1976, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn., Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A.: 1969, 'On the General Quantum Theory of Measurement', Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 65, 111-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, J. and G. Hertz: 1914, 'DeÜber Zusammenstöße zwischen Elektronen und den Molekülen des Quecksilberdampfes und die Ionisierungsspannung desselben', Verhandlung der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft 16, 457-467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, H. and E. Marsden: 1913, 'The Laws of Deflection of α Particles through Large Angles', Philosophical Magazine 25, 604-623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, L. D. and E. M. Lifshitz: 1965, Quantum Mechanics (Non-Relativistic Theory), 2nd edn., J. B. Sykes and J. S. Bell (trans.), Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margenau, H.: 1937, 'Critical Points in Modern Physical Theory', Philosophy of Science 4, 337-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margenau, H.: [1950] 1977, The Nature of Physical Reality, Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge.

  • Margenau, H.: 1958, 'Philosophical Problems Concerning the Meaning of Measurement in Physics', Philosophy of Science 25, 23-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margenau, H.: 1963, 'Measurements and Quantum States', Philosophy of Science 30, 1-16, 138-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. A.: 1916, 'A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck's “h” ', Physical Review 7, 355-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, D.: 1987, Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. L.: 1968, 'Quantum Theoretical Concepts of Measurement', Philosophy of Science 35, 205-231, 389-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, W.: [1958] 1980, General Principles of Quantum Mechanics, P. Achuthsen and K. Venkatesan (trans.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

  • Redhead, M: 1987, Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism (A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics), Clarendon Press, Oxford. Teller, P.: 1981, 'R. Giere (eds.), PSA 1980, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 1983, 'The Projection Postulate as a Fortuitous Approximation', Philosophy of Science 50, 413-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Haar, D.: 1967, The Old Quantum Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J.: [1932] 1955, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, R. T. Beyer (trans.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University College London, Gower St., London, WC1E 6BT, UK

    Hasok Chang

Authors
  1. Hasok Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, H. ON THE APPLICABILITY OF THE QUANTUM MEASUREMENT FORMALISM. Erkenntnis 46, 143–163 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005314013414

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005314013414

Keywords

Search

Navigation