Skip to main content
Log in

The ‘Platforms’ for Comparing Incommensurable Taxonomies: A Cognitive-Historical Analysis

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines taxonomy comparison from a cognitive perspective. Arguments are developed by drawing on the results of cognitive psychology, which reveal the cognitive mechanisms behind the practice of taxonomy comparison. The taxonomic change in 19th-century ornithology is also used to uncover the historical practice that ornithologists employed in the revision of the classification of birds. On the basis of cognitive and historical analyses, I argue that incommensurable taxonomies can be compared rationally. Using a frame model to represent taxonomy, I show how rational comparisons were achieved in the historical case through compatible contrast sets and attribute lists. Through analyzing the cognitive processes of classification and concept representation, I further explain how rival taxonomies in the historical case could be rationally compared on ‘platforms’ rooted in such cognitive mechanisms as relational assumptions and preferences for body parts in conceptual processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Andersen, H., Barker, P. and Chen, X.: 1996, 'Kuhn's Mature Philosophy of Science and Cognitive Psychology', Philosophical Psychology 9, 347-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, S.: 1858, Birds. Reports of Explorations and Surveys, to Ascertain the Most Practicable and Economic Route for a Railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, Vol. 9, Part 2, B. Tucker, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.: 1992, 'Frames, Concepts, and Conceptual Fields', in A. Lehrer and E. Kittay (eds), Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantical and Lexical Organization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 21-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.: 1999a, 'Perceptual Symbol Systems', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 577-609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.: 1999b, 'Perceptions of Perceptual Symbols', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 637-660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. and Hale, C.: 1993, 'Components of Conceptual Representation: From Featurelists to Recursive Frames', in I. Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski and P. Theuns (eds), Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis, Academic Press, New York, pp. 97-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L., Solomon, K. and Wu, L.: 1999, 'Perceptual Simulation in Conceptual Tasks', in M. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox (eds), Cultural, Typological, and Psychological Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics: the Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the International Cognitive Linguistics Association, Vol. 3, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 209-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.: 1976, 'General Principles of Human Anatomical Partonomy and Speculations on the Growth of Partonomic Nomenclature', American Ethnologist 3, 400-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.: 1994, 'Why Do Scientists Have Disagreements about Experiment?: Incommensurability in the Use of Goalderived Categories', Perspectives on Science 2, 275-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.: 1997, 'Thomas Kuhn's Latest Notion of Incommensurability', Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28, 257-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Andersen, H. and Barker, P.: 1998, 'Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Revolutions and Cognitive Psychology', Philosophical Psychology 11, 528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. and Barker, P.: 2000, 'Continuity Through Revolutions: A Framebased Account of Conceptual Change During Scientific Revolutions', Philosophy of Science 67, 208-223. 22 XIANG CHEN

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, P.: 1997, The Emergence of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline: 1760-1850, D. Reidel, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadow, H.: 1892, 'On the Classification of Birds', Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1892, 229-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandy, R.: 1992, 'Semantic Fields, Prototypes, and the Lexicon', in A. Lehrer and E. Kittay (eds), Frames, Fields, and Contrast: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 103-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1988, Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, P.: 1971, 'Taxonomy and Semantic Contrast', Language 47, 866-887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1989, 'Possible Worlds in History of Science', in S. Allen (ed.), Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences, Walter de Gruyter, New York, pp. 9-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1990, 'An Historian's Theory of Meaning', Talk to cognitive science colloquium, UCLA. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1991, 'The Road since Structure', in A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds), PSA 1990, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1993, 'Afterwords', in P. Horwich (ed.), World Changes, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 311-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, A.: 1893, A Dictionary of Birds, Adam and Charles Black, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, W. K.: 1863, 'On the Systematic Position of the Crested Screamers (Palamedea Chavaria)', Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 4, 511-518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, 'The Meaning of 'Meaning'', in K. Gunderson (ed.),Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 215-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J.: 1678, The Ornithology of Francis Willughby, John Martyn, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D. and Boyes-Braem, P.: 1976,'Basic Objects in Natural Categories', Cognitive Psychology 8, 382-439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. and Ahlquist, J.: 1990, Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stresemann, E.: 1975, Ornithology: From Aristotle to the Present, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundevall, C.: 1889, Sundevall's Tentamen, Porter, London.

  • Tversky, B. and Hemenway, K.: 1984, Objects, Parts, and Categories, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113, 169-193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, M., Chaffin, R. and Herrmann, D.: 1987, 'A Taxonomy of Partwhole Relations', Cognitive Science 11, 417-444. Department of Philosophy California Lutheran University 60 West Olsen Road Thousand Oaks, CA 91360–2787 USA

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X. The ‘Platforms’ for Comparing Incommensurable Taxonomies: A Cognitive-Historical Analysis. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33, 1–22 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020711522937

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020711522937

Navigation