Skip to main content
Log in

Aesthetics of Surrender: Levinas and the Disruption of Agency in Moral Education

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Education has long been charged with the taskof forming and shaping subjectivity andidentity. However, the prevailing view ofeducation as a project of producing rationalautonomous subjects has been challenged bypostmodern and poststructuralist critiques ofsubstantial subjectivity. In a similar vein,Emmanuel Levinas inverts the traditionalconception of subjectivity, claiming that weare constituted as subjects only in respondingto the other. In other words, subjectivity isderivative of an existentially priorresponsibility to and for the other. Hisconception of ethical responsibility is thusalso a radical departure from the prevailingview of what it means to be a responsible moralagent. In this paper, I use jazz improvisationas a metaphor to focus on three interrelatedaspects of ethical responsibility on Levinas'saccount: passivity, heteronomy, andinescapability. I then point toward some waysin which reframing responsibility andsubjectivity along this line might offer newpossibilities for conceiving subjectivity andmoral agency in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barrett, F.J. (2000). Cultivating an aesthetic of unfolding: Jazz improvisation as a self-organizing system. In S. Linstead & H. Höpfl (Eds), The Aesthetics of organization (pp. 228–245). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (1995). The act itself. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The Infinite art of improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchot, M. (1995). The writing of the disaster (A. Smock, trans). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1970). I and thou (W. Kaufmann, trans). New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. (1999). The ethics of deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. (1996). Levinas: An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2001). “A certain 'madness' must watch over thinking”: Refusing to build a philosophical system, derrida privileges experience and writes out of 'compulsion'. A Dialogue Around Traces and Deconstructions, (Jacques Derrida's interview with François Ewald), in G.J.J. Biesta & D. Egéa-Kuehne (Eds), Derrida & Education (pp. 55–76). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, P. (1996). Ricoeur between Heidegger and Levinas: Original affirmation between ontological contestation and ethical injunction. In R. Kearney (Ed), Paul Ricoeur: The hermeneutics of action (pp. 41–61). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity (A. Lingis, trans). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, trans). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1985). Ethics and infinity (R. Cohen, trans). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1993). Outside the subject (M.B. Smith, trans). London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1996a). Is ontology fundamental? In A.T. Peperzak, S. Critchley, & R. Bernasconi (Eds), Emmanuel Levinas: Basic philosophical writings (pp. 1–10). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1996b). Transcendence and height. In A.T. Peperzak, S. Critchley & R. Bernasconi (Eds), Emmanuel Levinas: Basic philosophical writings (pp. 11–31). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. & Kearney, R. (1986). Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. In R.A. Cohen (Ed), Face to face with Levinas (pp. 13–33). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. (1995). Reply to Bernard Waldenfels. In A.T. Peperzak (Ed), Ethics as first philosophy: The significance of Emmanuel Levinas for philosophy, literature and religion (pp. 53–58). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1992). The Challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. (1990). Love's knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peperzak, A. (1997). Beyond: The philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, R. & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. (1995). Response and responsibility in Levinas. In A.T. Peperzak (Ed), Ethics as first philosophy: The significance of Emmanuel Levinas for philosophy, literature and religion (pp. 39–52). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chinnery, A. Aesthetics of Surrender: Levinas and the Disruption of Agency in Moral Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 22, 5–17 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021129309618

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021129309618

Navigation