Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing Intention: Examining the Moderating Role of Locus of Control

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing body of whistleblowing literature includes many studies that have attempted to identify the individual level antecedents of whistleblowing behavior. However, cross-cultural differences in perceptions of the ethicality of whistleblowing affect the judgment of whistleblowing intention. This study ascertains how Chinese managers/professionals decide to blow the whistle in terms of their locus of control and subjective judgment regarding the intention of whistleblowing. Hypotheses that are derived from these speculations are tested with data on Chinese managers and professionals (n = 306). Statistical analysis largely supports the hypotheses, which suggests that an individual's locus of control does moderate the relationship between ethical judgment and whistleblowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I.: 1991, ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior’, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., K. Bass and G. Brown: 1996, ‘Religiosity, Ethical Ideology, and Intentions to Report a Peer's Wrongdoing’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 1161–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., D. S. Cochran and G. S. Taylor: 1993, ‘The Internal Disclosure Policies of Private-Sector Employers: An Initial Look at their Relationship to Employee Whistleblowing’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, L.: 1995, Ethics: The Enemy in the Workplace (South Western, Cincinnati).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. R.: 2000. Ethics and the Conduct of Business (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M.: 1996, The Handbook of Chinese Psychology (Oxford, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, R. G., J. M. Goulter and P. H. Mihalek: 1998, ‘Whistleblowing: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Perception of U.S. and Japanese Accounting Students’, American Business Review 16(2), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulter, P., J. Kohls and K. Anderson: 1991, ‘The Challenge of Global Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 767–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. C. and G. R. Holt: 1994, ‘A Chinese Perspective on Face as Inter-Relational Concern’, in S. Ting-Toomey (ed.), The Challenge of Facework (State University of New York, New York), pp. 95–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M. K.: 1998, ‘Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1825–1834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T. T. Y.: 2001, ‘Ethics Control Mechanism: A Comparative Observation of Hong Kong Companies’, Journal of Business Ethics 30(4), 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, R. and F. Kosinski: 1999, ‘The Role of Affective Dispositions in job Satisfaction and Work Strain: Comparing Collectivist and Individualist Societies’, International Journal of Psychology 34(1), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, R., V. Luk and T. Tang.: 2001, ‘Hong Kong and China: The Cash Mentality Revisited’, Compensation and Benefits Review (May/June), 66–72.

  • Chua, A. C. H. and D. B. Gould: 1995, ‘Whistleblowing: Public Interest or Personal Interest? The Experience of a Hong Kong Government Pharmacist’, Hong Kong Public Administration 4(2), 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D.: 1994, ‘Whistleblowing: Theory and Practice in Hong Kong’, Hong Kong Public Administration 3, 147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and P. Cohen: 1983, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and B. Loken: 1989, ‘Analysing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Business Research 19, 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, T. M. and M. S. Baucus: 1998, ‘Internal vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowing Processes’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(12), 1281–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O., J. Fraedrich and L. Ferrell: 2002, Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases (Hougton Mifflin, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F.: 1995, Trust (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, G.: 2002, ‘Major Issues of Business Ethics in Mainland China’, in L. Hartman (ed.), Perspectives in Business Ethics (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp 757–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, M. and P. Glazer.: 1989, The Whistle Blowers (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, S.: 1999, ‘Whistleblowing: Implementing an Employee Hotline’, Management Accounting 77(2), 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review 16, 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jubb, P. B.: 1999, ‘Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation’, Journal of Business Ethics 21(1), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, J. M.: 1985, Oriental Philosophies (Charles Scribner's Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, G. R. and P. E. Murphy: 1991, ‘Fostering Ethical Marketing Decisions’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 259–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennane, J.: 1996, ‘What Happens to Whistle-Blowers and Why’, in Klaas Woldring (ed.), Business Ethics (Nelson, Melbourne).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1997, ‘Whistleblowing at Work: Ingredients for an Effective Procedure’, Human Resource Management Journal 7(4), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. M., L. M. Lindsay and V. B. Irvine: 1996, ‘Instilling Ethical Behavior in Organizations: A Survey of Canadian Companies’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(4), 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M.: 1998, ‘The Whistleblower's Dilemma’, Management Today (October), 54–61.

  • McDonald, J.: 1998, ‘Why is Whistleblowing so Difficult?’, Chartered Accountant's Journal of New Zealand 77(8), 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlin, D. B. and P. D. Sweeney: 2001: ‘Cross-Cultural Applications of Organizational Justice’, in R. Cropanzano (ed.), Justice in the Workplace (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London), pp. 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1985, ‘Characteristics of Organizational Climate and Perceived Wrongdoing Associated with Whistleblowing Decisions’, Personnel Psychology 38, 525–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1992, Blowing the Whistle (Macmillan Publishing Company, Riverside, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., J. P. Near and J. B. Dozier: 1991, ‘Blowing the Whistle on Data Finding: A Controlled Field Experiment’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21, 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., J. R. Van Scotter, J. P. Near and M. T. Rehg: 2001, ‘Responses to Perceived Organizational Wrongdoing: Do Perceiver Characteristics Matter?’, in J. Darley, D. Messick and T. Tyler (eds.), Social Influences on Ethical Behavior in Organizations (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London), pp. 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P. and T. M. Dworkin: 1998, ‘Responses to Legislative Changes: Corporate Whistleblowing Policies’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(14), 1551–1561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.: 1981, Theory Z (Wesley, Reading, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, G.: 1990, The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism (Walter de Gruyter, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: 1990, ‘Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluation of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 639–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, J. and T. D. Miethe: 1999, ‘Whislteblower Disclosures and Management Retaliation: The Battle to Control Information about Organization Corruption’, Work and Occupation 26(1), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J.B.: 1966, ‘Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement’, Psychological Monographs 80 (1, Whole No. 609).

  • Sims, R. L. and J. P. Keenan: 1998, ‘Predictors of External Whistleblowing: Organizational and Intrapersonal Variables’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(4), 411–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steidlmeier, P.: 1998, ‘Business ethics in China’, in P. H. Werhane and R. E. Freeman (eds.), Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics (Blackwell, Oxford), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. and S. A. Youngblood: 1990, ‘Bad Apples in Bad barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 378–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B., L. K. Trevino and D. L. Shapiro: 1993, ‘Whistleblowing on Unethical Behavior: The Influence of Justice Evaluations and Social Context Factors’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinten, G.: 1992, ‘Whistleblowing: Corporate Help or Hindrance?’, Management Decision 20(1), 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinten, G.: 1995, ‘Audit Committees, Internal Control, and Corporate Governance’, Managerial Auditing Journal 10(6), 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinten, G.: 1999, ‘Whistleblowing-Hong Kong Style’, Public Administration and Policy 8(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiu, R.K. Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing Intention: Examining the Moderating Role of Locus of Control. Journal of Business Ethics 43, 65–74 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022911215204

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022911215204

Navigation