Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Issue Characteristics on the Recognition of Moral Issues

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The construct of moral intensity, proposed by Jones (1991), was used to predict the extent to which individuals were able to recognize moral issues. We tested for the effects of the six dimensions of moral intensity: social consensus, proximity, concentration of effect, probability of effect, temporal immediacy and magnitude of consequences. A scenario-based study, conducted among business individuals in Singapore, revealed that social consensus and magnitude of consequences influenced the recognition of moral issues. The study provided evidence for the effects of temporal immediacy. There was marginal support for the impact of proximity and probability of effect but no evidence that concentration of effect influenced recognition of moral issues. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of these results for researchers and organisational practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, C. S. and H. J. Becker: 1978, ‘The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research’, Public Opinion Quarterly 42(1), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, R.: 1992, ‘Short Forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale’, Psychological Reports 72, 1155–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, V.: 1979, Moral Issues in Business(Wadsworth, Belmont, California).

  • Baumhart, R. C.: 1961, ‘How Ethical are Businessmen?’, Harvard Business Review 39 ( July–August), 6–19, 156–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. and N. E. Bowie: 1979, Ethical Theory and Business(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, F. and J. Gandz: 1991, Good Management: Business Ethics in Action(Prentice-Hall Canada, Scarborough, Ontario).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S. N. and E. A. Molander: 1977, ‘Is the Ethics of Business Changing?’, Harvard Business Review 55(1), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.: 1992, ‘A Power Primer’, Psychological Bulletin 112(1), 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P. and D. Marlowe: 1964, The Approval Motive(Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and B. Loken: 1989, ‘Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Business Research 19(2), 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J.: 1988, ‘An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision-Maker, Consequences of the Decision, Management Position, and Sex of the Respondent’, Journal of Macromarketing 8(2), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. and H. Becker: 1983, ‘Ethical Behaviour of Marketing Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 2, 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. and H. Becker: 1984, ‘Linking Management Behaviour to Ethical Philosophy: An Empirical Investigation’, Academy of Management Journal 27(1), 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hembroff, L. A.: 1987, ‘The Seriousness of Acts and Social Contexts: A Test of Black's Theory of the Behaviour of Law’, American Journal of Sociology 93(2), 322–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: 1991, The Ethics of Management, 2nd ed. (Irwin, Illinois).

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6(1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organisations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1973, ‘On the Psychology of Prediction’, Psychological Review 80, 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, J. J.: 1996, ‘The Base Rate Fallacy Reconsidered: Normative, Descriptive and Methodological Challenges’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 19(1), 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, G. R. and E. J. Inderrieden: 1987, ‘The Influence of Stated Organisational Concern upon Ethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. and Z. Shapiro: 1987, ‘Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking’, Management Science 33(11), 1404–1408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B. and P. Dewe: 1997, ‘An Investigation of the Components of Moral Intensity’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 521–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattews, M. C.: 1988, Strategic Intervention in Organisations: Resolving Ethical Dilemmas(California Sage, Newbury Park).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S.: 1974, Obedience to Authority(Harper & Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A. and R. A. McDonald: 1995, ‘The Role of Moral Intensity in Moral Judgments: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 715–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research & Theory(Praeger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. C. and E. Anderson: 1993, ‘Control System and Task Environment Effects on Ethical Judgment: An Exploratory Study of Industrial Salespeople’, Organization Science 4(4), 617–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Majorie K.: 1994 ‘Gain/Loss Asymmetry in Risky Intertemporal Choice’, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 59, 124–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., S. Vittel and K. L. Kraft: 1996, ‘Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making of Marketing Professionals’, Journal of Business Research 36, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. C. and E. L. Schumann: 1987, ‘Interpretation of Statistical Evidence in Criminal Trials: The Prosecutor's Fallacy and the Defence Attorney's Fallacy’, Law and Human Behaviour 11(3), 167–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, J. A., F. Bird and P. D. Chant: 1986, ‘Everyday Moral Issues Experienced by Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L.: 1992, ‘Naked Statistical Evidence of Liability: Is Subjective Probability Enough?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(5), 739–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, K. M.: 1989, ‘Defining Sexual Harassment in Workplaces: A Policy-Capturing Approach’, Academy of Management Journal 32, 830–850.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chia, A., Lim, S.M. The Effects of Issue Characteristics on the Recognition of Moral Issues. Journal of Business Ethics 27, 255–269 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006392608396

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006392608396

Navigation