Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding local agri-food systems through advice network analysis

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agri-food clusters have generated great interest in recent years and prompted a new wave of research dedicated to ‘Localized Agri-Food Systems’ (SYALs in French). However, the specific nature of relations between firms who belong to SYALs has rarely been studied. Our purpose is to show how the analysis of company directors’ advice networks helps to better understand the specificity and innovative dynamics of SYALs. Our research was based on a case study in the Biterrois wine growing region of southern France. We conducted a survey to collect information on advice relations between wine cooperative managers, who play a key role in the innovation process toward quality wine. Sociometric analysis of the advice relations, coupled with interviews, led to three main results: the first was that managers simultaneously cooperate on technical projects and compete for business ends. The second was a correlation between the innovations implemented by the cooperatives and the degree of centrality of the managers in the networks, revealing the relational and local conditions of innovations in SYALs. The third was that managers can modify their own network to improve the competitiveness of both their own cooperative and of the SYAL as a whole. In conclusion, we show that advice network analysis is an appropriate tool to describe the relational dimension of SYALs, to better understand their process of innovation, and to help managers improve the collective strategies they apply within the SYAL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In less strategic or knowledge-intensive contexts (i.e., personal or professional daily life), advice relations are generally considered as reciprocal interactions (Borgatti et al. 2009).

  2. One of the more isolated cooperatives opted out.

  3. This aggregation is based on an assumption of complementarity between CEO and chairman ties in each cooperative.

  4. Pajek is a free program for network analysis. For more information, see http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/. .

Abbreviations

ANT:

Actor-network theory

AOC:

Appelation d’origine contrôlée

SYAL:

Système agroalimentaire localisé (Localized agri-food system)

References

  • Antonelli, C., J.-L. Gaffard, and M. Quéré. 2002. Interactive learning and technological knowledge: The localised character of innovation processes. In Cognitive development in economics, ed. S. Rizzello, 268–280. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barham, E. 2003. Translating terroir: The global challenge of French AOC labelling. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G. 2004. Industrial districts: A new approach to industrial change. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S.P., A. Mehra, D. Brass, and G. Labianca. 2009. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916): 892–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, F. 2012. De la AIR a la SIAL. Reflexiones, retos y desafios in America Latina. Revista Agroalimentaria 18(34): 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S. 1982. The Emilian model: Production decentralization and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge?, ed. J. Law. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiffoleau, Y. 2001. Pratiques et réseaux de l’innovation en milieu coopératif. Thèse de sociologie, Paris Université Paris 5, Paris.

  • Chiffoleau, Y. 2005. Learning about innovation through networks: The development of environment-friendly viticulture. Technovation 25: 1193–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiffoleau, Y., F. Dreyfus, R. Stofer, and J.-M. Touzard. 2007. Networks, innovation and performance: Evidence from a cluster of wine co-operatives (Languedoc, South of France). In Vertical markets and cooperative hierarchies, ed. K. Karantinis, and J. Nilsson, 37–62. Copenhagen: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courlet, C., and B. Soulage. 1994. Industrie, territoire et politiques publiques. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R.L., S.P. Borgatti, and A. Parker. 2001. Beyond answers: Dimension of the advice networks. Social Networks 23(3): 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R.L., S.P. Borgatti, and A. Parker. 2002. Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review 44: 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darré, J.-P. 1996. L’invention des pratiques. Paris: Karthala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degenne, A., and M. Forsé. 1999. Introducing social networks. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draperi, J.-F., and J.-M. Touzard (eds.). 2003. Coopératives, territoires, mondialisation. Paris: l’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favereau, O., and E. Lazega (eds.). 2003. Conventions and structures in economic organization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D., and B.A. Lundvall (eds.). 1996. Employment and growth in a knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S., and J. Muchnik. 2012. El enfoque SIAL y la activacion de recursos territoriales. Agroalimentaria 18(34): 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavignaud-Fontaine, G., and H. Michel (eds.). 2003. Vignobles du sud XVI ème –XX ème siècle. Montpellier: Edition de l’Université Paul Valery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, E. 2007. The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters. Journal of Economic Geography 72: 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, E., and M. Bell. 2005. The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from the Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy 341: 549–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., and M. Gargiulo. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology 104: 1439–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoponi, L. 1990. Distretto industriale marshalliano e nuove forme di organizzazione delle imprese in agricoltura. Rivista di Economia Agraria 4: 711–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, C., B. Johansson, and R. Stough. 2005. Industrial clusters and inter-firm networks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. 1996. The self-organizing economy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., and J. Hassard (eds.). 1999. Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, E. 2001. The collegial phenomenon: The social mechanisms of cooperation among peers in a corporate law partnership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, E. 2002. Réseaux et capacité collective d’innovation: l’exemple du brainstorming et de sa discipline sociale. In Les logiques de l’innovation, ed. N. Alter, 183–207. Paris: La Découverte, Collection Recherches.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, E., and L. Mounier. 2003. Interdependent entrepreneurs and the social discipline of their cooperation. In Conventions and structures in economic organization, ed. O. Favereau, and E. Lazega, 147–199. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Velly, R. 2002. La notion d’encastrement: une sociologie des échanges marchands. Sociologie du Travail 44(1): 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, M. 2003. The emergence of local productive systems. Research Policy 32(8): 1443–1462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, E., and J. Muchnik (eds.). 1997. Petites entreprises et grands enjeux: Le développement agroalimentaire local. Paris: l’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEvily, B., and A. Marcus. 2005. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 26(11): 1033–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., and J. Murdoch (eds.). 2006. Between the local and the global: Confronting complexity in the contemporary agri-food sector. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. 1891. Principles of economics. London: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, A. 1999. Ethics in action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research 12(2): 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchnik, J., and C. de Sainte Marie (eds.). 2010. Le temps des SYALs. Versailles: QUAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchnik, J., D. Resquier-Desjardins, D. Sautier, and J.-M. Touzard. 2007. Systèmes agroalimentaires localisés. Economies et Sociétés AG 29: 1465–1484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecqueur, B., and J.-B. Zimmermann. 2004. Economie de proximités. Paris: Hermès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation: The political and economical origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1998. Clusters and the new economic of competition. Harvard Business Review 76: 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Requier-Desjardin, D., F. Boucher, and C. Cerdan. 2003. Globalization, competitive advantage and evolution of productive systems. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 15: 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, A., and A. Rallet. 2005. Proximity and localization. Regional Studies 39: 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touzard, J.-M. 2000. Coordination locale, innovation et régulation: L’exemple de la transition vin de masse - vin de qualité. Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine 3: 305–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touzard, J.-M. 2002. Recensement des caves coopératives: Diversité des stratégies et des résultats Economiques. Paris: Agreste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touzard, J.-M. 2010. Ancrage territorial et construction de règles dans une organisation. In Le temps des SYAL, ed. J. Muchnik, and C. de Sainte Marie. Versailles: QUAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touzard, J.-M., Y. Chiffoleau, and F. Dreyfus. 2008. Analyser l’innovation dans un système agroalimentaire localisé: Approche interdisciplinaire en Languedoc. Cahiers agricultures 6(17): 526–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, Bn. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations. American Sociological Review 61: 674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg, J.D., and G. van Dijk. 1995. Beyond modernization: The impact of endogenous rural development. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H.C. 2002. Markets from networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Alain Degenne for his invaluable help in analyzing relational data and Laura Amalir, Tad Mutersbaugh, Sarah Bowen, and Jim Bingen for their assistance with the translation. We also thank our referees and the editor, Harvey James, for their relevant comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INRA UMR Innovation, 2 Place Viala, 34 060, Montpellier Cedex 1, France

    Yuna Chiffoleau & Jean-Marc Touzard

Authors
  1. Yuna Chiffoleau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Marc Touzard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuna Chiffoleau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiffoleau, Y., Touzard, JM. Understanding local agri-food systems through advice network analysis. Agric Hum Values 31, 19–32 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9446-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9446-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation