Abstract
Claims about the potential of free software to reform the production and distribution of software are routinely countered by skepticism that the free software community fails to engage the pragmatic and economic ‘realities’ of a software industry. We argue to the contrary that contemporary business and economic trends definitively demonstrate the financial viability of an economy based on free software. But the argument for free software derives its true normative weight from social justice considerations: the evaluation of the basis for a software economy should be guided by consideration of the social and cultural states which are the ultimate goals of any economic arrangement. That is, the software economy should be evaluated in light of its ability to provide justice. We conclude with a discussion of possible avenues for reform.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We thank an anonymous referee for this point.
Eric Raymond (2003) succinctly defines the hacker ethic as “The belief that information-sharing is a powerful positive good, and that it is an ethical duty of hackers to share their expertise by writing open-source code and facilitating access to information and to computing resources wherever possible.” A fuller discussion is in (Levy 1994).
As an anonymous referee reminds us, arguments that software should be treated as property only appeared in the late 1970 s, around the time the market for “personal computers” started to expand dramatically. Stallman, in “Why Software Should Be Free” (1992), points out that many programmers are more than happy to turn over the right to claim ownership over their work to their employees, in exchange for a salary. So arguments about software as property should not be based on Locke alone.
In re Opinion of the Justices, 69 A. 627 (Me. 1908).
See http://www.apache.org/foundation/thanks.html for a list of Apache's most generous corporate sponsors.
As an anonymous referee points out, this sort of informal consortial development, in which members of a software development community are employed by many different companies, producing both a method and results that no single company could emulate, is probably unique to FOSS. (The SHARE consortium of IBM users, founded in the 1950s, demonstrated the feasibility of this model in a significantly different technological environment.).
A recent ruling against business method patents—In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 88 U.S.P.Q.2d 1385—by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is an important step in the direction of removing patent protections for algorithms.
References
Aslett, M. (2008). Open source is not a business model. October 13, 2008. 451 CAOS Theory [online]. Accessed 3 April 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/10/13/open-source-is-not-a-business-model/.
Baker, D. (2009). Yes, we can make the stimulus more stimulating. January 12, 2009. truthout.org [online]. Accessed 15 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.truthout.org/011209R.
Benkler, Y. (2006) The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bessen, J., & Hunt, R. M. (2004). An empirical look at software patents. [online]. Accessed 11 March 2010. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.researchoninnovation.org/swpat.pdf.
Bessen, J., & Meurer, M. J. (2008). Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bishop, T. (2008). Ballmer: Free software means no free soda. February 8, 2008. The Microsoft blog [online]. Accessed 2 April 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/archives/131418.asp.
Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2008). Against intellectual monopoly. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Butcher, M. (2007). Software and the information oligarchy [online]. Accessed 1 March 2009. Proceedings of the 2007 Loyola University of Chicago calling to justice conference. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.luc.edu/ministry/pdfs/conference%20docs/CallingToJusticeConferenceFeb242007Butcher.pdf.
Butcher, M. (2009). At the foundations of information justice. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(1), 57–69.
Capek, C., Frank, S., & Shields, D. (2005). A history of IBM’s open-source involvement and strategy. IBM Systems Journal, 44(2), 249–257.
Cave, D. (2001). Microsoft to schools: Give us your lunch money! Salon.com [online]. Accessed 5 April 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/07/10/microsoft_school/.
Chopra, S., & Dexter, S. (2007). Decoding liberation: The promise of free and open source software. New York: Routledge.
Clarke, A., & Kohler, P. (2005). Property law: Commentary and materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dagan, H., & Re-Imagining Takings Law (2007). Available at SSRN (23 May 2007): http://ssrn.com/abstract=990946.
Davis, R., Samuelson, P., Kapor, M., & Reichman, J. (1996). A new view of intellectual property and software. Communications of the ACM, 39(3), 21–30.
Deek, F., & McHugh, J. A. M. (2008). Open source technology and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desmond, J. P. (2008). Innovation alive and well. SoftwareMag.com [online]. Accessed 20 March 2009]. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.softwaremag.com/L.cfm?Doc=1175-10/2008.
Dixon, R. (2003). Open source software law. Norwood, MA: Artech House Publishers.
England, J., & Harris, J. M. (1998). Alternatives to gross national product: A critical survey [online]. Accessed 20 March 2009. In F. Ackerman, D. Kiron, N. Goodwin, J. Harris, & K. P. Gallagher (Eds.), Human wellbeing and economic goals. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Available from World Wide Web: http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/publications/archives/englandpaper.pdf.
Epstein, R. A. (1985). Takings: Private property and the power of eminent domain, ISBN 0674867289. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ford, S. M. (2000). Compulsory licensing provisions under the TRIPs agreement: Balancing, pills and patents, 15 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 941, 965.
Free Software Foundation (1996). The free software definition [online]. Accessed 26 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.
Free Software Foundation (2008). High priority free software projects [online]. Accessed 4 April 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/priority.html.
Free Software Foundation Europe (2003). Free software in Europe: European perspectives and work of the FSF Europe [online]. Accessed 3 March 2009]. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.fsfeurope.org/documents/eur5greve.en.html.
Friends of the Earth (2009) How ISEW terms are calculated [online]. Accessed 30 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.foe.co.uk/community/tools/isew/brief.html.
Gasperson, T. (2007). Open source software lets Genuitec forgo venture capital. Linux.com [online]. February 13. Accessed 14 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.linux.com/articles/60092.
Ghosh, R. A. (2003). License fees and GDP per capita: The case for open source in developing countries. First Monday 8(12) [online]. Accessed 29 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_12/ghosh/.
Greene, T. C. (2001). Ballmer: “Linux is a cancer” [online]. Accessed 25 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/06/02/ballmer_linux_is_a_cancer/.
Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired [online]. June. Accessed 16 December 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html.
Iansiti, M., & Richards, G. L. (2006). The business of free software: Enterprise incentives, investment, and motivation in the open source community [online]. Accessed 20 March 2009. Harvard Business School Working Paper Series, No. 07-028. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/07-028.pdf.
Kelty, C. (2002). Hau to do things with words [online]. Accessed 5 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.kelty.org/or/papers/Kelty.Hautodothings.2002.rtf.
Kelty, C. (2005). Free Science. In J. Feller, et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on free and open source software. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kincaid, J. (2008). Mozilla extends lucrative deal with google for 3 years. TechCrunch.com [online]. August 28. Accessed 16 December 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/28/mozilla-extends-lucrative-deal-with-google-for-3-years/.
Lang, M. C. (2004). What a long, strange “TRIPS” it’s been: Compulsory licensing from the adoption of TRIPS to the agreement on implementation of the Doha declaration. 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. Law 331.
Laurent, St., & Andrew, M. (2004). Understanding open source & free software licensing. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.
Leonard, A. (2006). Free software, big oil, and venezuelan politics. Salon.com [online]. January 12. Accessed 15 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2006/01/12/venezuela/index_np.html.
Levy, S. (1994). Hackers: Heroes of the computer revolution. New York: Penguin.
Locke, J. (2002). The second treatise of civil government [online]. Accessed 3 April 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtreat.htm.
Macpherson, C. B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Madrick, J. (2008). The case for big government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Meller, P. (2008) Microsoft faces two new European antitrust cases. InfoWorld [online]. January 14. Accessed 9 April 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/microsoft-faces-two-new-european-antitrust-cases-504.
Montalbano, E. (2004) Intel joins venture capital firms as investor in Jboss. CRN.com [online]. May 10. Accessed 21 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.crn.com/it-channel/18842003.
MySQL AB (2003) MySQL AB Secures $19.5 Million Investment Round Led by Benchmark Capital [online]. Accessed 20 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.mysql.com/news-and-events/generate-article.php?id=2003_18.
New York Times (2009). Software industry snapshot [online]. Accessed 2 April 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://markets.on.nytimes.com/research/markets/usmarkets/industry.asp?industry=57212.
Oliva, A., & Rezende, P. (2008). On the constitutional preference for free software. Free Software Foundation-Latin America [online]. May 5. Accessed 24 February 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.fsfla.org/svnwiki/texto/pref-const-br-swl.en.
Piratenpartei Deutschland (2008). Parteiprogramme [online]. Accessed 17 March 2010. Available from World Wide Web: http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/Parteiprogramm/englisch.
Raymond, E. S. (2002). The magic cauldron [online]. Accessed 28 March 2009. In The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media. Available from World Wide Web: http://catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/magic-cauldron/index.html.
Raymond, E. S. (2003). Jargon File 4.4.7 [online]. Accessed 17 March 2010. Available from World Wide Web: http://catb.org/jargon/html/H/hacker-ethic.html.
Redefining Progress (2009). Genuine progress indicator [online]. Accessed 20 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.rprogress.org/sustainability_indicators/genuine_progress_indicator.htm.
Samuelson, P., Davis, R., Kapor, M., & Reichman, J. (1994). A manifesto concerning the legal protection of computer programs. Columbia Law Review, 94, 2308–2431.
Schiller, H. I. (1996). Information inequality. New York: Routledge.
Sen, A. (1991). On ethics and economics. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sen, A. (2009). Capitalism beyond the crisis. The New York Review of Books, 56(5), 27–30.
Simmons, A. J. (1994). The Lockean theory of rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Singer, P. (2009). The life you can save: Acting now to end world poverty. New York: Random House.
Software Freedom Law Center (2008). Software Freedom Law Center Announces Formation of Moglen Ravicher LLC [online]. Accessed 2 April 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/mar/26/moglen-ravicher.
Stallman, R. (1992). Why software should be free. In J. Gay (Ed.), Free software, free society: Selected essays of Richard Stallman. Cambridge, MA: GNU Press.
Stallman, R. (2002). Why software should not have owners. In J. Gay (Ed.), Free software, free society: Selected essays of Richard Stallman. Cambridge, MA: GNU Press.
Sunstein, C. (1997). Free markets and social justice. NY: Oxford University Press.
Tellis, P. (2005). Why FOSS in education makes sense. The Other Side of the Moon [online]. November 13. Accessed 2 April 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://tech.bluesmoon.info/2005/11/why-foss-in-education-makes-sense.html.
The Economist (2008). Look for the silver lining. July 17.
Uchitelli, L. (2008). Hey, big number, make room for the rest of us. New York Times [online]. August 31. Accessed 25 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/31/weekinreview/31uchitelle.html.
Unger, Peter. (1996). Living high and letting die: Our illusion of innocence. New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme (2009). The human development index (HDI) [online]. Accessed 9 April 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/indices/hdi/.
Weber, S. (2004). The success of open source. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Wheeler, D. C. (2007). Why open source software/free software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, or FOSS)? Look at the numbers! [online]. Accessed 18 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html#market_share.
Wikipedia (2010). Pirate Parties International. [online]. Accessed 17 March 2010. Available from World Wide Web: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_Parties_International.
World Trade Organization (2005). Frequently asked questions about TRIPS in the WTO [online]. Accessed 30 March 2009. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/tripfq_e.htm#CompulsoryLicensing.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the anonymous referees for their engagement and constructive comments. We also thank the attendees at the CEPE 2009 conference for their helpful feedback on an earlier version of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chopra, S., Dexter, S. Free software and the economics of information justice. Ethics Inf Technol 13, 173–184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9226-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9226-6